Skip to main content

Humans vs. Algorithms – Who Follows Newcomb-Benford’s Law Better with Their Order Volume?

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Applications and Services in the Finance Industry (FinanceCom 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 135))

  • 1133 Accesses

Abstract

Newcomb-Benford’s Law (NBL) is a well known regularity in the distribution of first significant digits (FSD) and therefore research in this field is manifold. As of 2012 research in the domain of financial markets is quite scarce, especially in the field of algorithmic trading. We pose the question whether order submission volumes of algorithmic traders and human traders follow NBL. Results in this context might help regulators to detect suspicious market activity and market participants to quantify the amount of algorithmic trading. Our findings indicate that the submitted order volumes of both groups follow NBL more than the uniform distribution. Comparing these two groups, we give a proof that algorithmic traders match NBL better than human traders, as human traders tend to overuse the FSD five.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Newcomb, S.: Note of frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics 4(1), 39–40 (1881)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benford, F.: The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 78(4), 551–572 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hürlimann, W.: Benford’s law from (1881-2006) Working Paper, http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0607168

  4. Beebe, N.H.F.: A Bibliography of Publications about Benford’s Law, Heaps’ Law, and Zipf’s Law. Working Paper (2012), ftp://ftp.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/benfords-law.ps.gz

  5. Buck, B., Merchant, A.C., Perez, S.M.: An illustration of Benford’s first digit law using alpha decay half lives. European Journal of Physics 14(2), 59–63 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya, S., Xu, D., Kumar, K.: An ANN-based auditor decision support system using Benford’s law. Decision Support Systems 50(3), 576–584 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolton, R.J., Hand, D.J.: Statistical Fraud Detection: A Review. Statistical Science 17(3), 235–249 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durtschi, C., Hillison, W., Pacini, C.: The effective use of Benford’s law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data. Journal of Forensic Accounting 5(1), 17–34 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ley, E.: Checking Financial markets via Benford’s law. Working Paper (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corazza, M., Ellero, A., Zorzi, A.: On the Peculiar Distribution of the U.S. Stock Indexes’ Digits. In: Proceedings of the International Conference MAF 2008 – Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Acturial Sciences and Finance, Shanghai (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zdravko, K., Zgela, M.: Evaluation of Benford’s Low Application in Stock Prices and Stock Turnover. Informatologia 42(3), 158–165 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhipeng, L., Cong, L., Wang, H.: Discussion on Benford’s Law and its Application. Working Paper, http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0408057

  13. Abrantes-Metz, R.M., Villas-Boas, S.B., Judge, G.: Tracking the Libor rate. Applied Economics Letters 18(10), 893–899 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giles, D.E.: Benford’s law and naturally occurring prices in certain ebaY auctions. Applied Economics Letters 14(3), 157–161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns, B.: Sensitivity to statistical regularities: People (largely) follow Benford’s law. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott, S.K., Barnard, P.J., May, J.: Specifying executive representations and processes in number generation tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54(3), 641–664 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harris, L.: Stock price clustering and discreteness. Review of Financial Studies 4(3), 389–415 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haferkorn, M. (2013). Humans vs. Algorithms – Who Follows Newcomb-Benford’s Law Better with Their Order Volume?. In: Rabhi, F.A., Gomber, P. (eds) Enterprise Applications and Services in the Finance Industry. FinanceCom 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36219-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36219-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36218-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36219-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics