Abstract
An agent’s preferences are sometimes formed as a result of her options or, more precisely, her beliefs about her options. It is sometimes claimed that such adaptive preferences are not autonomous, and that, therefore, actions on the basis of such preferences are not autonomous either. Through the examination of some accounts of autonomy and adaptive preferences, I show that the claim that adaptive preferences are not autonomous is highly ambiguous.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Steinberg, J.: Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary. Sci. Eng. Ethics 17, 201–212 (2011)
Bostrom, N.: Why I Want to be a Posthuman when I Grow Up. In: Gordijn, B., Chadwick, R. (eds.) Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, pp. 107–137. Springer, New York (2008)
Bovens, L.: Sour Grapes and Character Planning. J. Philos 89, 57–78 (1992)
Bruckner, D.W.: Against the Tedium of Immortality. Int. J. Philos Stud. 20, 623–644 (2012)
Bruckner, D.W.: Colburn on Covert Influences. Utilitas 23, 451–457 (2011)
Bruckner, D.W.: In Defense of Adaptive Preferences. Philos Stud. 142, 307–324 (2009)
Bublitz, J.C., Merkel, R.: Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits. Bioethics 23, 360–374 (2009)
Christman, J.: Autonomy and Personal History. Can J. Philos 21, 1–24 (1991)
Christman, J.: The Politics of Persons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Colburn, B.: Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas 23, 52–71 (2011)
Elster, J.: Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, New York (1983)
Fischer, J.M.: Why Immortality is Not So Bad. Int. J. Philos Stud. 2, 257–270 (1994)
Fuller, L.: Knowing Their Own Good: Preferences and Liberty in Global Ethics. In: Brooks, T. (ed.) New Waves in Ethics, pp. 210–230. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstroke (2011)
Harris, J.: Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)
Khader, S.: Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Nussbaum, M.: Symposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 5 Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options. Econ. Philos 17, 67–88 (2001)
Oshana, M.: Autonomy and the Question of Authenticity. Soc. Theory Pract. 33, 411–429 (2007)
Rosenberg, J.F.: Reassessing Immortality: The Makropulos Case Revisited. In: McDaniel, K., Raibley, J.R., Feldman, R., Zimmerman, M.J. (eds.) The Good, the Right, Life and Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman, Ashgate, Burlington VT, pp. 227–240 (2006)
Stoljar, N.: Autonomy or Authenticity? Commentary on Andrea Westlund’s ’Rethinking Relational Autonomy’ and Catriona Mackenzie and Jacqui Poltera’s ’Narrative Integration, Fragmented Selves and Autonomy. Symposium on Gender, Race and Philosophy (2011), http://web.mit.edu/sgrp
Temkin, L.: Is Living Longer Living Better? J. Appl. Philos 25, 193–210 (2008)
Westlund, A.C.: Selflessness and Responsibility for Self: Is Deference Compatible with Autonomy? Philos Rev. 112, 483–523 (2003)
Westlund, A.C.: Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia 24, 26–49 (2009)
Westlund, A.C.: Reply to Benson, Christman, Rocha, and Stoljar. In: Symposium on Gender, Race and Philosophy (2011), http://web.mit.edu/sgrp
Williams, B.: The Makropulos Case: Reflections on The Tedium of Immortality. In: Williams, B. (ed.) Problems of the Self, pp. 82–100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)
Zimmerman, D.: Sour Grapes, Self-Abnegation, and Character Planning. Monist 86, 220–241 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bruckner, D.W. (2013). Adaptive Preferences, Autonomy, and Extended Lives. In: Räikkä, J., Varelius, J. (eds) Adaptation and Autonomy: Adaptive Preferences in Enhancing and Ending Life. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38375-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38376-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)