Skip to main content

Conditional Beliefs in a Bipolar Framework

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7958))

Abstract

A framework for quantifying lower and upper bipolar belief is introduced, which incorporates aspects of stochastic and of semantic uncertainty as well as an indeterministic truth-model allowing for inherent linguistic vagueness at the propositional level. This is then extended to include lower and upper measures of conditional belief given information in the form of lower and upper truth-valuations. The properties of these measures are explored and their relationship with conditional belief in other uncertainty theories is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An Introduction to Bipolar Representations of Information and Preference. Int. Journal of Intelligent Systems 23(8), 866–877 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubois, D.: On Ignorance and Contradiction Considered as Truth-Values. Logic Journal of the IGPL 16(2), 195–216 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Goguen, J.A.: The Logic of Inexact Concepts. Synthese 19, 325–373 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kleene, S.C.: Introduction to Metamathematics. D. Van Nostrand Company Inc., Princeton (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawry, J., Tang, Y.: On Truth-gaps, Bipolar Belief and the Assertability of Vague Propositions. Artificial Intelligence 191-192, 20–41 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawry, J., Dubois, D.: A Bipolar Framework for Combining Beliefs about Vague Propositions. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 530–540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawry, J., González-Rodríguez, I.: A Bipolar Model of Assertability and Belief. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52, 76–91 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawry, J.: Imprecise Bipolar Belief Measures Based on Partial Knowledge from Agent Dialogues. In: Deshpande, A., Hunter, A. (eds.) SUM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6379, pp. 205–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawry, J.: Appropriateness Measures: An Uncertainty Model for Vague Concepts. Synthese 161(2), 255–269 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lukasiewicz, J.: O logice trojwartosciowej (On three-valued logic). Ruch Filozoficzny 5, 170–171 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parikh, R.: Vague Predicates and Language Games. Theoria XI(27), 97–107 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paris, J.B.: A Note on the Dutch Book Method. In: Proceedings of ISIPTA 2001, Ithaca, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapiro, S.: Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Deemter, K.: Utility and Language Generation: The Case of Vagueness. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38, 607–632 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Williamson, T.: Vagueness. Routledge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A.: The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning: I. Information Sciences 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lawry, J., Martin, T. (2013). Conditional Beliefs in a Bipolar Framework. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7958. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39090-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39091-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics