Skip to main content

The Representation for All Model: An Agent-Based Collaborative Method for More Meaningful Citizen Participation in Urban Planning

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013 (ICCSA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7973))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our Model is designed to greatly increase public participation in urban planning and make it more citizen-friendly. We use an agent technology consisting of a pair of opinion-miner recommender agents which, through mining of the opinions of citizens, make recommendations to planners on the design of the master plan. The advantages of using recommender agent technology in our DSS Model are that it accelerates acceptance of planning proposals and creates more participatory urban planning. A particularly innovative feature of our Model is that public participation occurs both before and during the development of the master plan, and in a citizen-friendly way. With our Model, planners come up with citizen-sensitive proposals and are able to more accurately predict the reaction of citizens to them. The case of the redesign of the Diagonal Avenue in Barcelona is provided as a concluding example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gordon, E., Schirra, S., Hollander, J.: Immersive planning: a conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 38, 505–519 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., Painho, M.: An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities 27(3), 172–181 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brabham, D.: Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory 8(3), 242–262 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dai, C., Li, T.: Research on the Application of Virtual Reality Technology in the Large-scale Public Construction Planning Dynamic Analysis, Editor(s): China Civil Eng. Soc., Chinese Acad. of Eng./DCHAE; Tongji Univ., China State Construction Eng. Co. Ltd. Proceedings of Shanghai Intl. Conf. on Tech. of Architecture and Structure, 580–586 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bogdahn, J., Coors, V., Sachdeva, V.: A 3D tool for public participation in urban planning. In: Coors, V., Rumor, M., Fendel, E., Zlatanova, S. (eds.) Urban and Regional Data Management. Procs. and Monographs in Eng., Water and Earth Sciences, pp. 231–236 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Howard, T.L.J., Gaborit, N.: Using virtual environment tech. to improve public participation in urban planning process. J. Urban Planning and Dev., ASCE 133(4), 233–241 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dzitac, I., Moisil, I.: Advanced AI Techniques for Web Mining. In: Mastorakis, N.E., Poulos, M., Mladenov, V., Bojkovic, Z., Simian, D., Kartalopoulos, S. (eds.) Mathematical Methods, Computational Techniques, Non-linear Systems, Intelligent Systems. Mathematics and Computers in Science and Engineering, pp. 343–346 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ligtenberg, A., Bregt, A., Van Lammeren, R.: Multi-actor-based land use modelling: spatial planning using agents. Landscape and Urban Planning 56, 21–33 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ligtenberg, A., Beulens, A., Kettenis, D., Bregt, A., Wachowicz, M.: Simulating knowledge sharing in spatial planning: An agent-based approach. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 36, 644–663 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kou, X., Yang, L., Cai, L.: Artificial Urban Planning: Application of MAS in Urban Planning Education. In: 2008 Intl. Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Design, vol. 2, pp. 349–353 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner, R.: On the metric, topological and functional structures of urban networks. Physical-statistical Mechanics and its Applications 387(2008), 2120–2132 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, J., Jiang, J., Yeh, A.: Designing a GIS-based CSCW system for dev. control with an event-driven approach. Photogrammetric Eng. and Remote Sensing 70, 225–233 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, X., Liu, X.P.: Embedding sustainable development strategies in agent-based models for use as a planning tool. Intl. Journal of Geographical Information Science 22, 21–45 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Batty, M.: Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. The MIT Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aschwanden, G., Haegler, S., Bosche, F., Van Gool, L., Schmitt, G.: Empiric design evaluation in urban planning. Automation in Construction 20, 299–310 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dijkstra, J., Timmermans, H.: Towards a multi-agent model for visualizing simulated user behavior to support the assessment of design performance. Automation in Construction 11, 135–145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinhöfel, J., Anders, F., Köhler, H., Kalisch, D., König, R.: Computer-Based Methods for a Socially Sustainable Urban and Regional Planning – CoMStaR. In: Taniar, D., Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Pardede, E., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6016, pp. 152–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Arentze, T.A., Borgers, A., Ma, L.D., Timmermans, H.: An agent-based heuristic method for generating land-use plans in urban planning. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 37, 463–482 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: Validation and Experimentation of a Tourism Recommender Agent based on a Graded BDI Model. In: Alsinet, T., PuyolGruart, J., Torras, C. (eds.) AI Research and Dev. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 41–50 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, H.-L., Yang, H.-F.: Recommender agent based on social network. In: Okuno, H.G., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4570, pp. 943–952. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Haubl, G., Murray, K.: Double agents. MIT SLOAN Management Review 47 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosaci, D., Sarne, G.: Dynamically Computing Reputation of Recommender Agents with Learning Capabilities. In: Badica, C., Mangioni, G., Carchiolo, V., Burdescu, D.D. (eds.) Intel. Distributed Comput., Systems & Appl. SCI, vol. 162, pp. 299–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaiane, O.: Building a recommender agent for e-learning systems. In: Kinshuk, X., Lewis, R., Akahori, K., Kemp, R., Okamoto, T., Henderson, L., Lee, C.H. (eds.) Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education (I –II), pp. 55–59 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cristian Mihǎescu, M., Burdescu, D.D., Ionascu, C.M., Logofatu, B.: Intelligent Educational System Based on Personal Agents. In: Damiani, E., Jeong, J., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) New Directions in Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services - 2. SCI, vol. 226, pp. 545–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Karoui, H., Kanawati, R., Petrucci, L.: COBRAS: Cooperative CBR system for bibliographical reference recommendation. In: Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Göker, M.H., Güvenir, H.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4106, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Garruzzo, S., Rosaci, D., Sarné, G.M.L.: MARS: An agent-based recommender system for the semantic web. In: Indulska, J., Raymond, K. (eds.) DAIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4531, pp. 181–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Takenouchi, T., Kawamura, T., Ohsuga, A.: Development of knowledge-filtering agent along with user context in ubiquitous environment. In: Enokido, T., Yan, L., Xiao, B., Kim, D.Y., Dai, Y.-S., Yang, L.T. (eds.) EUC-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3823, pp. 71–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Montaner, M., Lopez, B., de la Rosa, J.: A taxonomy of recommender agents on the Internet. Artificial Intelligence Review 19, 285–330 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, J.H., Kwon, H.J., Hong, K.S.: Location awareness-based intelligent multi-agent technology. Multimedia Systems 16, 275–292 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, C.S., Wang, M.H., Hagras, H.A.: Type-2 Fuzzy Ontology and its Application to Personal Diabetic-Diet Recommendation. IEICE Trans. on Info. and Systems 18, 374–395 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McCarey, F., O’Cinneide, M., Kushmerick, N.: A recommender agent for software libraries: An evaluation of memory-based and model-based collaborative filtering. In: Nishida, T., et al. (eds.) 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM Intl Conf. on Intelligent Agent Technology (2006), pp. 154–162 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kantardzic, M.: Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, B.: Web Data Mining. Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Lau, R.: Belief revision for adaptive recommender agents in E-commerce. In: Liu, J., Cheung, Y.-M., Yin, H. (eds.) IDEAL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2690, pp. 99–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kusumura, Y., Hijikata, Y., Nishida, S.: NTM-Agent: Text mining agent for net auction. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E87D, 1386–1396 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Blanke, T., Hedges, M., Palmer, R.: Restful services for the e-Humanities - web services that work for the e-Humanities ecosystem. In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, pp. 290–295 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chiang, J.H., Chen, Y.C.: An intelligent news recommender agent for filtering and categorizing large volumes of text corpus. Intl J. of Intelligent Systems 19, 201–216 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Aciar, S., Zhang, D., Simoff, S., Debenham, J.: Informed recommender agent: Utilizing consumer product reviews through text mining. In: Butz, C.J., et al. (eds.) IEEE/WIC/ACM Intl Conf. on Web Intelligence and Agent Technology, pp. 37–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Papagelis, M., Plexousakis, D.: Qualitative analysis of user-based and item-based prediction algorithms for recommendation agents. Eng. Applications of AI 18, 781–789 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smeureanu, I., Diosteanu, A., Delcea, C., Cotfas, L.: Business Ontology for Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility. Amfiteatru Economic 13, 28–42 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L., Riedl, J.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Reidl, J.: Item-based coll. filtering recommendation algorithms. In: 10th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, pp. 285–295. ACM Press, NY (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pazzani, M.: A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review 13, 393–408 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J., Pohl, W.: Personalized hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships. The Knowledge Eng. Review 16, 111–155 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Krulwich, B.: Lifestyle finder: intelligent user profiling using large-scale demographic data. Artificial Intelligence Magazine 18, 37–45 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, Z., Liu, A.: Toward Intelligent Web Collaborative Learning System. In: Hu, Z.B., Liu, Q.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science III, pp. 467–471 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lele, N., Wu, L., Akavipat, R., Menczer, F.: Sixearch.org 2.0 peer application for collaborative web search. In: Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive, Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia Table of Contents, pp. 333–334 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Trias, A., Mansilla, J., de la Rosa, J.L.L.: Asknext: An Agent Protocol for Social Search. Information Sciences 190, 144–161 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Smyth, B., Briggs, P., Coyle, M., O’Mahony, M.: Google Shared. A Case-Study in Social Search. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 283–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Yu, B., Singh, M.P., Sycara, K.: Developing Trust in Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems. In: First IEEE Symposium on Multi-Agent Security and Survivability, pp. 1–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kassoff, M., Petrie, C., Zen, L.M., Genesereth, M.: Semantic Email Addressing, The Semantic Web Killer App? IEEE Internet Computing, 30–37 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Scottish Transport Organization, http://www.scottishtransport.org/new_trams_for_edinburgh/edinburgh_tram_i

  53. Dublin Municipality. Railway Procurement Agency, http://www.rpa.ie/en/Pages/default.aspx

  54. London transport authority, http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/final-report.pdf

  55. Transport for Greater Manchester, http://www.tfgm.com/2009_news.cfm?news_id=9006950?submenuheader=3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marsal-Llacuna, ML., de la Rosa-Esteva, JL. (2013). The Representation for All Model: An Agent-Based Collaborative Method for More Meaningful Citizen Participation in Urban Planning. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013. ICCSA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7973. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39645-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39646-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics