Skip to main content

Implementation and Evaluation of a Backtracking Algorithm for Finding All Justifications in OWL 2 EL

  • Conference paper
Linked Data and Knowledge Graph (CSWS 2013)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 406))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1296 Accesses

Abstract

Finding justifications plays an important role in the development and maintenance of ontologies. It helps users or developers to understand the entailments by presenting the minimal subsets of the ontology which are responsible for the entailment (called justification). In our previous work, we have proposed a backtracking algorithm for finding justifications in description logic \(\mathcal{EL}^{+}\), which underpins OWL 2 EL, a profile of the latest version of Web Ontology Language (OWL). However, the algorithm is not implemented. In this paper, we implement this algorithm and conduct experiments on some real world ontologies, including Snomed-CT. We compare our algorithm with a black-box algorithm for finding all justification in OWL 2 EL. The experimental results show that in most cases, the backtracking algorithm outperforms the black-box one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) Envelope. In: IJCAI, pp. 364–369 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Pinpointing in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}^{+}\). In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4667, pp. 52–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Debugging SNOMED CT Using Axiom Pinpointing in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}^{+}\). In: KR-MED (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, X., Qi, G.: An algorithm for axiom pinpointing in \(\mathcal{EL}^{+}\) and its incremental variant. In: CIKM, pp. 2433–2436 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Horridge, M., Sirin, E.: Finding All Justifications of OWL DL Entailments. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 267–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Hendler, J.A.: Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies. J. Web Sem., 268–293 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Non-Standard Reasoning Services for the Debugging of Description Logic Terminologies. In: IJCAI, pp. 355–362 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Finding all justifications in SNOMED CT. Research Article, 79–90 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhou, Z., Qi, G. (2013). Implementation and Evaluation of a Backtracking Algorithm for Finding All Justifications in OWL 2 EL. In: Qi, G., Tang, J., Du, J., Pan, J.Z., Yu, Y. (eds) Linked Data and Knowledge Graph. CSWS 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 406. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54025-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54025-7_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54024-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54025-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics