Skip to main content

Administration of Contrast Media

  • Chapter
Contrast Media in Practice
  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

It seems, from first principles, entirely reasonable that CM which are, generally speaking, injected into patients in high concentrations and large doses might be better tolerated if delivered at body temperature. Many radiologists use one of the commercially available thermostatically controlled heating cabinets to warm their CM to 37°C. In any case, toxicity and tolerance aside, warming the CM to body temperature significantly reduces its viscosity, making injection easier, particularly with small needles and catheters [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  1. Halsell RD (1987) Heating contrast media. Role in contemporary angiography. Radiology 164: 276–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner E, Kentner P, Melamed JL, Rao G, Seitz MJ (1982) Frequency of anaphylactoid reactions during intravenous urography with radiographic contrast media at two different temperatures. Radiology 143: 327–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilcox J, Sage MR (1984) Is viscosity important in the production of blood-brain-barrier disruption by intracarotid contrast media? Neuroradiology 26:511–513?

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Ansell G (1987) Radiological contrast media. In: Inman WHW (ed) Monitoring for drug safety, znd ed. MTP Press, Lancashire, pp 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson P, Hemingway A (1987) Contrast doses in interventional radiology. J Intervent Radiol 2: 145–146

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Bernstein EF, Palmer JD, Aaberg TA, Davis RL (1961) Studies on the toxicology of Hypaque90% following rapid venous injection. Radiology 76: 88–95

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies P, Roberts MB, Roylance J (1975) Acute reactions to urographic contrast media. BMJ 2: 434–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lorenz W, Doericke A (1985) Histamino libération induite par les produits anésthesique ou leurs solvants: spécifique ou non-spécifique. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 4: 115: 123

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pfister RC, Hutter AM (1982) Alteration in heart rate and rhythm at urography with sodium diatrizoate. Acta Radiologica 23: 107–110

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shehadi WM (1975) Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media. AJR 124: 145–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Dawson P et al. (1986) Contrast, coagulation and fibrinolysis. Invest Radio! 21: 248–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson P (1988) Non-ionic contrast agents and coagulation. Invest Radio! 23: 310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson P (1988) Non-ionic contrast agents and coagulation. Invest Radio! 23: 310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hawkins IF, Herbeth (1974) Contrast material used as a catheter flushing agent: a method to reduce clot formation during angiography. Radiology 110: 351–352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller DL (1989) Heparin in angiography: current patterns of use. Radiology 172: 1007–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson HJF (1987) Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 162: 621–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Ueda J Furukawa T, Higashino K et al. (1996) Elimination of lomeprol by hemodialysis. Eur J Radiol 23: 197–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Furukawa T, Ueda J, Takahashi S, Sakaguchi K (1996) Elimination of low osmolality contrast-media by hemodialysis. Acta Radiol 37: 966–971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Younathan CM, Kaude JV, Cook MD, Shaw GS, Peterson JC (1994) Dialysis is not indicated immediately after administration of non ionic contrast agents in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by maintenance dialysis. Am J Roentgenol 163: 969–971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huhn HW, Tönnis HJ, Schmidt E (1993) Elimination von Röntgenkontrasmitteln durch Haemodialyse. Nieren-u Hochdruckkrankh 22: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jakobsen JA (1995) Renal effects of iodixanol in healthy volunteers and patients with severe renal failure. Acta radiol (Suppl. 399 ): 191–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Leder RA, Baker ME (1990) Extravasation of nonionic radio-logic contrast media: efficacy of conservative treatment. Radiology 174: 65–67

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miles SG, Rasmussen JF, Litwiller T (1990) Safe use of an intravenous power injector for CT: experience and protocol. Radiology 176: 69–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pond GD, Dorr RT, McAleese KA (1992) Skin ulceration from extravasation of lowosmolality contrast medium: a complication of automation. AJR 158: 915–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Young RA (1994) Injury due to extravasation of nonionic contrast material (letter). AJR162:1499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Memolo M, Dyer R, Zagoria RJ (1993) Extravasation injury with nonionic contrast material. AJR 160: 203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yucha CB, Hastings-Tolsma M, Szeverenyi M (1994) Effect of elevation on intravenous extravasations. J Intraven Nurs 17: 231–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elam EA, Dorr RT, Lagel ICE, Pond GD (1991) Cutaneous ulceration due to contrast extravasation: experimental assessment of injury and potential antidotes. Invest Radiol 26: 13–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Few BJ (1987) Hyaluronidase for treating intravenous extravasations. Am J Matern Child Nurs 12: 87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loth TS, Jones DEC (1988) Extravasations of radiographic contrast material in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg [Am] 13: 395–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Garner WL (1996) Extravasation of radiographic contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Radiology 200: 593–604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dawson, P., Skalpe, I.O., Taenzer, V., Scherberich, J.E., Clauss, W. (1999). Administration of Contrast Media. In: Dawson, P., Clauss, W. (eds) Contrast Media in Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59957-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59957-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64759-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59957-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics