Abstract
It seems, from first principles, entirely reasonable that CM which are, generally speaking, injected into patients in high concentrations and large doses might be better tolerated if delivered at body temperature. Many radiologists use one of the commercially available thermostatically controlled heating cabinets to warm their CM to 37°C. In any case, toxicity and tolerance aside, warming the CM to body temperature significantly reduces its viscosity, making injection easier, particularly with small needles and catheters [1].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
References
Halsell RD (1987) Heating contrast media. Role in contemporary angiography. Radiology 164: 276–278
Turner E, Kentner P, Melamed JL, Rao G, Seitz MJ (1982) Frequency of anaphylactoid reactions during intravenous urography with radiographic contrast media at two different temperatures. Radiology 143: 327–329
Wilcox J, Sage MR (1984) Is viscosity important in the production of blood-brain-barrier disruption by intracarotid contrast media? Neuroradiology 26:511–513?
References
Ansell G (1987) Radiological contrast media. In: Inman WHW (ed) Monitoring for drug safety, znd ed. MTP Press, Lancashire, pp 337–348
Dawson P, Hemingway A (1987) Contrast doses in interventional radiology. J Intervent Radiol 2: 145–146
References
Bernstein EF, Palmer JD, Aaberg TA, Davis RL (1961) Studies on the toxicology of Hypaque90% following rapid venous injection. Radiology 76: 88–95
Davies P, Roberts MB, Roylance J (1975) Acute reactions to urographic contrast media. BMJ 2: 434–437
Lorenz W, Doericke A (1985) Histamino libération induite par les produits anésthesique ou leurs solvants: spécifique ou non-spécifique. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 4: 115: 123
Pfister RC, Hutter AM (1982) Alteration in heart rate and rhythm at urography with sodium diatrizoate. Acta Radiologica 23: 107–110
Shehadi WM (1975) Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media. AJR 124: 145–152
References
Dawson P et al. (1986) Contrast, coagulation and fibrinolysis. Invest Radio! 21: 248–252
Dawson P (1988) Non-ionic contrast agents and coagulation. Invest Radio! 23: 310–317
Dawson P (1988) Non-ionic contrast agents and coagulation. Invest Radio! 23: 310–317
Hawkins IF, Herbeth (1974) Contrast material used as a catheter flushing agent: a method to reduce clot formation during angiography. Radiology 110: 351–352
Miller DL (1989) Heparin in angiography: current patterns of use. Radiology 172: 1007–1011
Robertson HJF (1987) Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 162: 621–622
References
Ueda J Furukawa T, Higashino K et al. (1996) Elimination of lomeprol by hemodialysis. Eur J Radiol 23: 197–200
Furukawa T, Ueda J, Takahashi S, Sakaguchi K (1996) Elimination of low osmolality contrast-media by hemodialysis. Acta Radiol 37: 966–971
Younathan CM, Kaude JV, Cook MD, Shaw GS, Peterson JC (1994) Dialysis is not indicated immediately after administration of non ionic contrast agents in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by maintenance dialysis. Am J Roentgenol 163: 969–971
Huhn HW, Tönnis HJ, Schmidt E (1993) Elimination von Röntgenkontrasmitteln durch Haemodialyse. Nieren-u Hochdruckkrankh 22: 45–52
Jakobsen JA (1995) Renal effects of iodixanol in healthy volunteers and patients with severe renal failure. Acta radiol (Suppl. 399 ): 191–195
References
Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Leder RA, Baker ME (1990) Extravasation of nonionic radio-logic contrast media: efficacy of conservative treatment. Radiology 174: 65–67
Miles SG, Rasmussen JF, Litwiller T (1990) Safe use of an intravenous power injector for CT: experience and protocol. Radiology 176: 69–70
Pond GD, Dorr RT, McAleese KA (1992) Skin ulceration from extravasation of lowosmolality contrast medium: a complication of automation. AJR 158: 915–916
Young RA (1994) Injury due to extravasation of nonionic contrast material (letter). AJR162:1499
Memolo M, Dyer R, Zagoria RJ (1993) Extravasation injury with nonionic contrast material. AJR 160: 203
Yucha CB, Hastings-Tolsma M, Szeverenyi M (1994) Effect of elevation on intravenous extravasations. J Intraven Nurs 17: 231–234
Elam EA, Dorr RT, Lagel ICE, Pond GD (1991) Cutaneous ulceration due to contrast extravasation: experimental assessment of injury and potential antidotes. Invest Radiol 26: 13–16
Few BJ (1987) Hyaluronidase for treating intravenous extravasations. Am J Matern Child Nurs 12: 87
Loth TS, Jones DEC (1988) Extravasations of radiographic contrast material in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg [Am] 13: 395–398
Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Garner WL (1996) Extravasation of radiographic contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Radiology 200: 593–604
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dawson, P., Skalpe, I.O., Taenzer, V., Scherberich, J.E., Clauss, W. (1999). Administration of Contrast Media. In: Dawson, P., Clauss, W. (eds) Contrast Media in Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59957-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59957-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64759-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59957-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive