Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry ((AGRICULTURE,volume 9))

  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

Until recently, for the improvement of agricultural crops the traditional way of breeding and selection has been the only choice. However, with the development of new biotechnology methods (see Bajaj 1986), the alternative of directed genetic modification has become available. If used wisely, such manipulation techniques could become a powerful tool to solve agricultural problems. In vitro transformation is one of these techniques, and it has several advantages over traditional plant breeding. If genes for specific desirable properties of the plant can be isolated, they can be directly introduced into plant cells in one step, and whole plants possessing the new property can be regenerated, rather than having to go through the traditional tedious and time-consuming process of crossing and selection necessary so far (Cocking 1985). With the help of a suitable vector, desirable genes present in one species of plants — or even bacteria or animals — could be transferred to completely unrelated species with which natural exchange of genetic information cannot be achieved, making it possible to cross genetic borders imposed by nature (Wullems and Schilperoort 1985).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bajaj YPS (1986) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 2. Crops I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Black J (1957) Flora of South Australia. Part I V. K. M. Stevenson, Government Printer, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking EC (1985) Applications of protoplast technology. In: Pilet P (ed) The Physiological Properties of Plant Protoplasts. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 6–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Durand J, Potrykus I, Donn G (1973) Plantes issues de protoplastes de pétunia. Z Pflanzenphysiol 69:26 — 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt C, Schnebli V, King P (1981) Isolation of biochemical mutants using haploid mesophyll protoplasts of Hyoscyamus muticus. II. Auxotrophic and temperature-sensitive clones. Planta 153: 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanold D (1983) In vitro transformation of protoplast-derived Hyoscyamus muticus cells by Agro-bacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci Lett 30: 177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill A (1952) Economic botany. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia J, Potrykus I, Lazar G, Saul M (1983) Hyoscyamus-Nicotiana fusion hybrids selected via auxotroph complementation and verified by species-specific DNA hybridisation. In: Potrykus I, Harms C, Hinnen A, Hatter R, King P, Shillito RA (eds) Protoplasts 1983, Poster Proc 6th Int Protoplast Symp Basel, Birkhäuser, pp 110–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapwijk P, Scheuldermann T, Schilperoort R (1978) Coordinated regulation of octopine degradation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens: evidence for a common regulatory gene and separate operons. J Bacteriol 136:775— 785

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linsmaier E, Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirement of tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 18: 100–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lörz H, Wernicke W, Potrykus I (1979) Culture and plant regeneration of Hyoscyamus protoplasts. Planta Med 36: 21–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch E, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton L, Wullems G, Molendijk L, Schilperoort RA (1979) In vitro transformation of cultured cells from Nicotiana tabacum by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 277: 129–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley B (1970) Wild flowers of the world. Rainbird Reference Books, p 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Nester E, Kosuge T (1981) Plasmids specifying plant hyperplasias. Annu Rev Microbiol 35: 531–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otten L, Schilperoort RA (1978) A rapid microscale method for the detection of lysopine and nopaline dehydrogenase activity. Biochem Biophys Acta 527: 497–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I, Shillito R, Jia J, Lâzâr G (1982) Auxotroph complementation via protoplast fusion in Hyoscyamus muticus and Nicotiana tabacum. In: Lurquin P, Kleinhof A (eds) Genetic engineering in eucaryotes. Proc NATO Advanced Study Institute, Pullman 1982, Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern E (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98: 503–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A (1989) Hyoscyamus species: In vitro culture and the production of tropane alkaloids. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 7. Medicinal and aromatic plants II. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 286–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A, Bucher F, King P (1981) Isolation of biochemical mutants using haploid mesophyll protoplasts of Hyoscyamus muticus. I. A nitrate non-utilising clone. Planta 153: 75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernicke W, Thomas E (1980) Studies on morphogenesis from isolated plant protoplasts: shoot formation from mesophyll protoplasts of Hyoscyamus muticus and Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Sci Lett 17:401 — 407

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernicke W, Lörz H, Thomas E (1979) Plant regeneration from leaf protoplasts of haploid H. muticus L. produced via anther culture. Plant Sci Lett 15: 239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wullems G, Schilperoort RA (1985) Plant protoplast transformation by Agrobacterium in relation to plant biotechnology. In: Fowke L, Constable F (eds) Plant Protoplasts, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 205–229

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanold, D. (1989). Transformation in Hyoscyamus . In: Bajaj, Y.P.S. (eds) Plant Protoplasts and Genetic Engineering II. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74454-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74454-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74456-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74454-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics