Skip to main content

Orientation and Spatial Occupancy Representations in Shape Analysis

  • Conference paper
Active Perception and Robot Vision

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 83))

  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we propose representations of two-dimensional curves that capture curve orientation and spatial occupancy, and show how they can be used in isolation or jointly to address problems in dynamic shape analysis and model-based matching of occluded objects. To explicitly represent curve orientation, we generalize the notion of extended circular image to a non-convex curve, by representing it as a sequence of extended circular images of its convex and concave parts. Evaluating the similarity of two curves can then be reduced to evaluating the similarity of corresponding segments by directly correlating their extended circular images. To explicitly represent spatial occupancy in a manner that can be used in shape matching, we blur the two-dimensional binary image obtained from the curve. Two curves that are similar in both shape and size and optimally aligned with respect to each other in both position and orientation will then result in a value close to one of the correlation coefficient obtained from the respective binary images. In dynamic shape analysis we use the orientation-based representation alone, while in the model-based matching of occluded objects we use orientation for generating hypotheses and spatial occupancy for selecting the correct ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haruo Asada and Michael Brady. The curvature primal sketch. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(1): 2–14, January 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Ayache and O. Faugeras. HYPER: A new approach for the recognition and positioning of two-dimensional objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8, January 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Bhanu and O. Faugeras. Shape matching of two-dimensional objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6: 137–155, March 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bolles and R. Cain. Recognizing and locating partially visible objects: the local feature focus method. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1, Fall 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Borgefors. Hierarchical chamfer matching: a parametric edge matching algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10(6): 849–865, November 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Ettinger. Hierarchical object recognition using libraries of parameterized model subparts. Technical Report TR-963, MIT AI Laboratory, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Grimson. On the recognition of curved objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(6):632–642, June 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Horn. Robot Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. In 1st Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 259–268, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Knoll and R. Jain. Recognizing partially visible objects using feature indexed hypotheses. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2: 3–13, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Koenderick and A. Van Doorn. The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception, 11: 129–137, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Koenderink and A. van Doorn. Dynamic shape. Biological Cybernetics, 53: 383–396, 1986.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Leyton. A process grammar for shape. Artificial Intelligence, 34(2): 213–247, March 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Little. An iterative method for reconstructing convex polyhedra from external gaussian images. In Proceedings of the Americal Association for Artificial Intelligence Conference, pages 247–254, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Lowe. Organization of smooth image curves at multiple scales. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 558–567, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Mehrotra and W. Grosky. Shape matching utilizing indexed hypotheses generation and testing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5(l): 70–77, February 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Milios. Shape matching using curvature processes. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 47: 203–226, August 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Millman and G. Parker. Elements of Differential Geometry. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Moravec. Sensor fusion in certainty grids for mobile robots. AI Magazine, pages 61–74, Summer 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Richards and D. Hoffman. Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31(2): 156–177, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Richards, J. Koenderink, and D. Hoffman. Inferring 3d shapes from 2d codons. Technical Report AIM-840, MIT AI Lab, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Schwartz and M. Sharir. Identification of partially obscured objects in two dimensions by matching of noisy ‘characteristic curves’. Technical Report Robotics Research TR 46, New York University, Courant Institute, Computer Science Division, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Sha’ashua and S. Ullman. Structural saliency: the detection of globally salient structures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 321–327, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Turney, T. Mudge, and R. Volz. Recognizing partially occluded parts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 7, July 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Walters. Selection of image primitives for general-purpose visual processing. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 37(3): 261–298, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Zucker, C. David, A. Dobbins, and L. Iverson. The organization of curve detection: coarse tangent fields and fine spline coverings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 568–577, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Milios, E.E. (1992). Orientation and Spatial Occupancy Representations in Shape Analysis. In: Sood, A.K., Wechsler, H. (eds) Active Perception and Robot Vision. NATO ASI Series, vol 83. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77225-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77225-2_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77227-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77225-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics