Skip to main content

Comparison of Varihesive E with the Conventional Tulle Gras Dressing in Skin Graft Donor Sites Treatment of Infants

  • Conference paper
Wound Healing and Skin Physiology
  • 551 Accesses

Abstract

The conventional open or nonocclusive treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites using wide-meshed, lattice tulle gras compresses impregnated with saline, paraffin or ointments requires frequent dressing changes, which are usually painful and often sanguineous. Even today, this complicates donor site treatment in children. Pediatric surgery practice therefore requires a type of wound dressing that: (a) provides a safe, immovable wound cover adhering tightly to healthy skin, even in mobile children, and (b) that can be changed without causing the patient pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Hefton JM, Eaglstein WH (1983) The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and reepithelialisation in superficial wounds. J Surg Res 35:142–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biltz H, Kiessling M, Kreysel HW (1986) Vergleich von VarihesiveR und Kochsalzgaze in der Behandlung von Donorarealen nach Spalthautentnahme. Extr Dermatol 10(1):23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donati L, Vigano M (1988) Use of the hydrocolloidal dressing DuoDERM for skin donor sites for burns. Int J Tissue React 10:267–272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doherty C, Geraldine L, Noble S (1986) Granuflex hydrocolloid as a donor site dressing. Care Crit Ill 5:11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg M (1986) The effect of occlusive dressings on reepithelialisation of wounds in children with epidermolysis bullosa. J Pediatr Surg 21:829–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldmann DL, Rogers A, Karpinski RH (1991) A prospective trial comparing Biobrane, DuoDERM and Xero-form for skin graft donor sites. Surg Gynecol Obstet 173(1): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hermans MHE, Hermans RP (1986) DuoDERM, an alternative dressing for smaller burns. Burns 12:214–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermans MHE (1990) DuoDERM E in the treatment of donor sites: a report. Ann MBC 3:166–169.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leicht P, Sum E, Dreyer M, Larsen TK (1991) DuoDERM application on scalp donor sites in children. Burns 17(3):230–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Madden MR, Finkelstein JL, Hefton JM, Yurt R (1985) Optimal healing of donor sites with hydrocolloid dressings. In: Ryan TJ (ed) An environment for healing: the role of occlusion Roy Soc Med (Lond) 136:133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Madden MR, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL, Yurt RW, Smeland J, Goodwin CW, Hefton J, Staiano-Coico L (1989) Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma 29(7):924–930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. May SR (1984) Physiology, immunology and clinical efficacy of an adherent polyurethane dressing: Opsite. In: Wise LW (ed) Burn wound coverings, vol 2. CRC Press, New York, pp 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perrot J, Carsin H, Gibaud J (1986) Utilisation du pansement DuoDERM dans 1a cicatrisation des prises de greffes chez le brule. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 31(3):279–282.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Waffle C, Simon RR, Joslin C (1988) Moisture vapour permeable film as an outpatient burn dressing. Burns 14:14–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Winter CD (1963) Effect of air drying and dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature 197:91–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Winter CD (1970) Healing of skin wounds and the influence of dressings in the repair proces. In: Harkiss KJ (ed) Surgical dressings and wound healing, Bradford University Press, Bradford, pp 46–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wagemann, W., Franke, B., Krause, H. (1995). Comparison of Varihesive E with the Conventional Tulle Gras Dressing in Skin Graft Donor Sites Treatment of Infants. In: Altmeyer, P., Hoffmann, K., el Gammal, S., Hutchinson, J. (eds) Wound Healing and Skin Physiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77882-7_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77882-7_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56124-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77882-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics