Abstract
Reliability and testability of equipment used in anesthesia, alarm technology, and the fail-safe concept can be discussed from the perspective of the investigator or as experienced by the clinician in 1994. In this presentation I will present the view of the North American clinician working with modern and well-established equipment rather than with experimental or advanced research systems. Therefore, I shall focus on current systems in terms of their reliability; I shall mention testing practices, delineate alarms, and examine how far we have come to realize fail-safety. Finally, I shall address conceptual issues surrounding the question of reliability, testability, alarm technology, and the fail-safe system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cooper JB, Newbower RS, McPeek B (1978) Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors. Anesthesiology 49: 399–406
Weinger MB, Englund CE (1990) Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology 73: 995–1021
Lee DE (1991) Pre-operative check-list revisited. ASA Newslett 55: 9
Carstensen P (1986) FDA issues pre-use checkout. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newslett 1: 13–15
Morrison JL (1994) FDA Anesthesia apparatus checkout recommendations, 1993. ASA Newslett 58: 25
Gravenstein JS, Larkin CR jr (1994) Equipment competency — we might have a problem. J Clin Monit 10: 1–3
Food and Drug Administration (1994) Write it right. J Clin Monit (in press)
van Oostrom JH, Gravenstein C, Gravenstein JS (1993) Acceptable ranges for vital signs during general anesthesia. J Clin Monit 9: 321–325
Mclntyre JWR (1985) Ergonomics: anaesthetists’ use of auditory alarms in the operating room. Int J Clin Monit Comput 2: 47–55
Keats AS (1990) Anesthesia mortality in perspective. Anesth Analg 71: 113–119
Gravenstein JS, Paulus DA, Hayes T (1994) Gas monitoring in clinical practice. Butterworth, London (in press)
Runciman WB (1993) Qualitative versus quantitative research — balancing cost, yield and feasibility. Anaesth Intensive Care 21: 502–505
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gravenstein, J.S. (1995). Reliability, Testability, Alarms, and the Fail-Safe Concept. In: Schwilden, H., Stoeckel, H. (eds) Control and Automation in Anaesthesia. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79573-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79573-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79575-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79573-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive