Skip to main content

Extending a Relational DBMS Towards a Rule-Based System: An Approach Using Predicate Transition Nets

  • Chapter
Foundations of Knowledge Base Management

Abstract

We examine some problems which arise when extending a relational DBMS to support production rules. First, a rule language compatible with classical relational database languages is presented. This language may be seen as an extension of Datalog with non-clausal conditions, tuple variables, functions and updates. The essential contribution of this chapter is then the introduction of a new rule execution model to generate query answers. This highly parallel model is based on extended Petri Nets known as duplicate free Predicate Transition Nets (PrTN). It is shown that such a model is a useful tool to determine rule program consistency and convergence, and to optimize query processing. An algorithm to move up selections in the presence of recursive rules with function symbols is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aho, A.V., and J.D. Ullman, “Universality of Data Retrieval Languages”, Proc. ACM 6th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, San Antonio, Texas, January 1979, pp. 110-117.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bancilhon, F., D. Maier, Y. Sagiv, and J.D. Ullman, “Magic Sets and Other Strange Ways to Implement Logic Programs”, MCC Internal Report, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, C., “On Evaluation of Queries Containing Derived Relation in a Relational Database”, Workshop on Logic and Databases, Toulouse 1979, in [GMN81].

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Maindreville, C., and E. Simon, “...”, Internal Report, INRIA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gardarin, G., P. Bernadat, N. Temmerman, P. Valduriez, and Y. Viemont, “Design of a Multiprocessor Relational Database System”, IFIP 1983 World Computer Congress, Paris, September 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Genrich, H.J., and K. Lautenbach, “System Modelling with High-Level Petri Nets”, Theoretical Computer Science, No. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallaire, H., J. Minker, and J.-M. Nicolas, Advances in Database Theory, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gallaire, H., J. Minker, and J.-M. Nicolas, “Logic and Databases: A Deductive Approach”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 16, No. 2, June 1984, pp. 153–185.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Giordana, A., and L. Saitta, “Modelling Production Rules by Meads of Predicate Transition Networks”, Information Sciences Journal, North-Holland, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes-Roth, F., “Rule-Based Systems”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 28, September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henschen, L.J., and S.A. Naqui, “On Compiling Queries in Recursive First-Order Databases”, ACM Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, January 1984, pp. 47–85.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lozinskii, E.L., “Evaluation Queries in Deductive Databases by Generating Subqueries”, Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, August 1985, pp. 173-177.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marque-Pucheu, G., “Algebraic Structure of Answers in a Recursive Logic Database”, Rapport Ecole Normale Superieure, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merrett, T.H., Relational Information Systems, Chapter 5, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Minker, J., “Performing Interfaces over Relational Data Bases”, Proc. ACM International Workshop on the Management of Data, Description, Access and Control, New York, May 1975, pp. 79-87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Minker, J., “Search Strategy and Selection Function for an Inferential Relational System”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 1978, pp. 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Minker, J., and J.-M. Nicolas, “On Recursive Axioms in Deductive Databases”, Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1,1983, pp. 1–13.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson, J.L., Petri Net Theory and Modelling of Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Reiter, R., “Towards a Logical Reconstruction of Relational Database Theory”, in [BMS84], pp. 191-234.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ullman, J.D., “Implementation of Logical Query Languages for Databases”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems SIGMOD, Austin, Texas, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vieille, L., “On Handling Recursively Defined Virtual Relations in Deductive Databases”, Internal Report, ECRC, Munich, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardarin, G., de Maindreville, C., Simon, E. (1989). Extending a Relational DBMS Towards a Rule-Based System: An Approach Using Predicate Transition Nets. In: Schmidt, J.W., Thanos, C. (eds) Foundations of Knowledge Base Management. Topics in Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83397-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83397-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83399-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83397-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics