Skip to main content

Reduction of Environmental Risk as a Public Good

  • Conference paper
Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research

Abstract

When group members share their resources equally, regardless of their contribution to the collective group outcomes, equity norms may be violated. Some individuals may use the opportunity to take a free ride and as a result others will be put in the position of suckers. The equal division rule, however, has a clear advantage that has received little theoretical and empirical attention. Sharing with others reduces the risk associated with individual outcome in an uncertain environment and thus has the effect of insurance. We report an experiment in which we examined subjects’ willingness to share with others as a function of environmental uncertainty and personal risk preferences. Specifically, each subject had to choose between an individual lottery and an equal share of a combined group lottery. We found that, when uncertain about their own outcome, risk-averse individuals prefer the less risky group option, whereas risk-seeking individuals prefer to take their own risk. Assuming that in real-life situations people are typically risk-averse, we conclude that the desire to reduce uncertainty concerning one’s outcomes indeed motivates people to pool their risks with other group members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop, Y.M.M., Feinberg, S.E., & Holland, P.W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (1985). Coping with risk: Reciprocity among the Basarwa of Northern Botswana. Man, 20, 454–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S.J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data Vol. 1. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, L. (1982). Traditional attitudes to land resources. In R. M. Berndt (Ed.) Aboriginal sites: Rites and resource development. Perth: University of Western Australia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1983). The significance of storage in hunting societies. Man, 18, 553–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenderink, T.B., Meertens, R.M., & Vlek, C.A.J. (1995). Motieven voor persoonlijke en interpersoonlijke risiokeuzes. In: N.K. de Vries, C.K.W, de Dreu, N. Ellemers, & R. Vonk (Eds.) Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie Deel 9, pp. 209–220. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In L. Wheeler and P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and Social psychology Vol. 4, pp. 11–44. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D.M., Allison, S.T., & Samuelson, C.D. (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members’ responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In: S. Maital (Ed.) Applied Behavioural Economics Vol. 2, pp. 677–700. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. (1993). Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and the pressure for generosity among foragers. American Anthropologist, 95, 860–874. Sahlin

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age economics. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R., and Ockenfels, A. (1995). An experimental solidarity game. Fourth Amsterdam Workshop on Experimental Economics, 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, R., & Rapoport, A. (1988). Environmental and social uncertainty in single-trial resource dilemmas. 11th Conference on: Subjective probability, utility and decision making. Acta Psychologica, 68, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., and Kahneman D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988). Seriousness of social dilemmas and the provision of a sanctioning system. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wilke, M., Rutte, C.G., Bornstein, G. (1996). Reduction of Environmental Risk as a Public Good. In: Liebrand, W.B.G., Messick, D.M. (eds) Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85261-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85261-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-85263-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85261-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics