Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Symposium A Haben therapeutische Maßnahmen die Prognose von Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinomen verbessert?

  • Conference paper
91. Kongreß

Part of the book series: Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für innere Medizin ((VDGINNERE,volume 91))

  • 17 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ashikari R, Huvos AG, Snyder R (1977) Prospektive study of non infiltrating carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 39: 435–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell DA, Hajdu StI, Urban JA, Gaston JP (1983) Role of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of mammary lesions in office practice. Cancer 51: 1182–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergholz M, Schauer A, Reck H, Gregl A (1979) Krebsrisiko bei papillären Proliferationen der Brustdrüse. Langenbecks Arch Chir 348: 157–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Betsill WL, Rosen PP, Liebermann PH, Robbins SF (1978) Intraductal carcinoma: long term follow up after treatment by biopsy alone. J Amer Assoc 239: 1863–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloom HJG, Richardson WW (1957) Histologic grading and prognosis in breast cancer. A study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Brit J Cancer 11: 359–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brehler R, Bergholz M, Voigt E, Döll S, Schauer A (1985) Vergleich and Wertung morphologischer and immunhistochemischer Parameter des Mammakarzinoms. Verh der Dt Ges f Pathologie. Gustav-Fischer-Verlag (im Druck )

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crile SJr (1961) Simplified treatment of cancer of the breast: Early results of a clinical study. Am J Surg 153: 745–761

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crile GJr (1965) Early carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg 109: 400–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Droese M (1981) Punktionszytologie der Brustdrüse. In: Siewert R, Schauer A, Nagel G, Frischkorn R, Droese M, Rauschecker H, Wander HE (Hrsg) Mammakarzinome. Chirurgie der Gegenwart, Band I II, Urban and Schwarzenberg, München Wien Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evers R, Fischediek O (1973) Die Punktionsbiopsie des Mammakarzinoms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 118: 466–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher ER, Swamidoss S, Lee CH, Rockette H, Redmond C, Fisher B (1978) Detection and significance of occult axillary node metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer. Cancer 42: 2025–2031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher B, Wolmark N, Bauer M (1981) The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152: 765–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, Poisson R, Piech Y, Redmond C, Fisher E, Wolmark N, Deutsch M, Montagùe E, Saffer E, Wickerham L, Lerner H, Glass A, Shibata H, Deckers P, Ketachm A, Oishi R, Russell I (1985) Five year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. New Engl J Med 312: 666–681

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franzen S, Zajicek EJ (1968) Aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of palpable lesions of the breast — critical review of 3479 consecutive biopsies. Vol 7, pp. 241–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene GL, Fitch FW, Jensen EV (1980a) Monoclonal antibodies to extrophilin: probes for the study of estrogen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 157–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Greene GL, Nolan C, Engler JO, Jensen EV (1980b) Monoclonal antibodies to human estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 5115–5119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Greene GL, Jensen EV (1982) Monoclonal antibodies as probes for estrogen receptor detection and characterization. J Steroid Biochem 16: 353–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Greene GL, Sobel NB, King WJ, Jensen EV (1984) Immunochemical studies of estrogen receptors. J Steroid Biochem Vol 20: 51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greene GL (1984) Application of immunochemical techniques to the analysis of estrogen receptor structure and function. In: Litwack G (ed) Biochemical Actions of Hormones, Vol 11, Academic Press, New York, pp. 207–239

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herfarth CH Zit. nach Würthner K (1985) In: Radikales Vorgehen beim kleinen Mammakarzinom noch immer die sicherste Methode. Dtsch Ärztebl 4: 3084–3085

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kline TS, Hunter SN (1976) Needle aspiration of the breast-Why bother? Acta Cytologica 20: 324–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kreuzer G, Boquoi E (1976) Aspiration biopsy cytology, mammography and clinical exploration; a modern set up in diagnosis of tumors of the breast. Acta Cytol 20: 319–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Millis RR, Thyne GSJ (1975) In situ intraduct carcinoma of the breast: a long term follow up study. Brit J of Surgery 62: 957–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosen PP (1980) Lobular carcinoma in situ: Recent clinico pathologic studies at Memorial Hospital. Path Res Pract 166: 433–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosen PP, Saigo PE, Braun DW, Beattie EJ, Kinne DW (1982) Occult axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancers with intramammary lymphatic tumor emboli. Am J Surg Pathol 6: 639–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Kinne DW, Beattie EJ (1983) Discontinous of „Skip“ metastases in breast carcinoma. Analysis of 1228 axillary dissections. Ann Surg 197: 276–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rummel HH, Bothmann G, Kubli F (1975) Die Stellung der Feinnadelbiopsie in der Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms. Arch Gynecol 219: 139–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schauer A, Bergholz M, Gregl A, Reck H (1979) Krebsrisiko bei papillären Proliferationen der Brustdrüse. Verh Dt Krebsges 2: 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schauer A (1981) Mammakarzinom: Pathologische Anatomie. In: Zenker R, Deucher F, Schink W (eds) Chirurgie der Gegenwart Band III, Urban und Schwarzenberg, München Wien Baltimore, S. 6–39

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schauer A, Brehler R, Bergholz M (1985) Tumormarker in der Mamma-Karzinomdiagnostik. Verhandl Dt Ges f Pathologie, G Fischer, Stuttgart New York (im Druck )

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schöndorf H, Naujoks H (1974) Die Aspirationszytologie bei Mammatumoren. Fortschr Med 92: 1400–1404

    Google Scholar 

  32. Veronesi U, Saccozii R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, Gallus C, Greco M, Luini A, Marubini E, Muscolino G, Rilke F, Salvadori B, Zecchini A, Zugali R (1981) Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. New Engl J Med 305: 6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wallgren A, Zajicek J (1976) Cytologic presentation of mammary carcinoma on aspiration biopsy smears. Acta Cytol 20: 469–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber K, Osborn M, Moll R, Wiklung B, Lüning B (1984) Tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) is related to the non-epidermal keratins 8, 18, and 19 typical of simple and non squamous epithelia re-evaluation of a human tumor marker. EMBO J 3: 2707–2714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zajdela A, Ghossein NA, Pilleron JP, Ennuyer A (1975) The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer: Experience at the Foundation Curie. Cancer 35: 499–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zajicek J (1978) Aspiration biopsy cytology of breast carcinoma. In: Grundmann E, Beck L (eds) Cancer Campaign, Vol. 1: Early diagnosis of breast cancer. G Fischer, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and Endresults Reporting (1978) Staging of cancer of the breast: manual for staging of cancer. Whiting Press, Chicago, p. 101

    Google Scholar 

  38. Baclesse F (1959) Roentgen therapy as the sole method of treatment of cancer of the breast. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 62: 311–319

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brinkley D, Haybittle JL (1984) Long-term survival of women with breast cancer. Lancet 11: 18

    Google Scholar 

  40. Donegan WL, Spratt JS (1979) Cancer of the Breast. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fischer B, Montague E, Redmond C et al. (1977) Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer: a first report on results from a prospective randomized clincal trial. Cancer 39: 2827–2839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fischer B, Bauer M, Margolese R et al. (1985) Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and sementa mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 312: 665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Friedl W, Henningsen B, Reichel R, Häring R (1985) Überlebens-und Rezidivraten des Mamma-Karzinoms unter Berücksichtigung der Radikalität der primär operativen Behandlung. 10-Jahresergebnisse der Südwestdeutschen Mammakarzinomstudie. Langenbecks Arch Chir: Kongreßband

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hayward J (1981) The surgeons rule in primary cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1: 27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hellman S, Harris JR, Levene MB (1980) Radiation therapy of early carcinoma of the breast without mastectomy. Cancer 46: 988–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Herfarth Ch (1982) Die Bedeutung der Radikalität für die operative Therapie des Mammakarzinoms. In: Frischbier H-J (Hrsg) Die Erkrankung der weiblichen Brustdrüse. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 180–184

    Google Scholar 

  47. Herfarth Ch (1985) Chirurgische Prophylaxe bei Präkanzerosen und nichtinvasiven Karzinomen der Mamma. Langen-becks Arch Chir: KongreBband

    Google Scholar 

  48. Keynes G (1929) The treatment of primary carcinoma of the breast with radium. Acta Radio! 10: 393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sarrazin D, Lê MH, Fontaine MF, Arriagade R (1983) Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in T1 or small T 2 breast cancer-A randomized clinical trial. In: Harris JR, Hellman S, Silen W (eds) Conservative Management of Breast Cancer. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp. 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  50. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vechio M et al. (1981) Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 305: 6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wilson RE, Donegan WL, Mettlin C (1984) The 1982 national survey of carcinoma of the breast in the United States by the American College of Surgeons. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159: 309–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Göttingen, Deutschland

    G. A. Nagel

  2. Pathologisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Deutschland

    A. Schauer, M. Bergholz & R. Brehler

  3. Abteilung 2.1.1., Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Ch. Herfarth

  4. St. Gallen, Deutschland

    H. J. Senn

  5. Basel, Deutschland

    R. Hünig

Authors
  1. G. A. Nagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Schauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Bergholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Brehler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ch. Herfarth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. J. Senn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Hünig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Humboldtstr. 14, D-6200, Wiesbaden, Deutschland

    Klaus Miehlke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 J. F. Bergmann Verlag, München

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nagel, G.A. et al. (1985). Symposium A Haben therapeutische Maßnahmen die Prognose von Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinomen verbessert?. In: Miehlke, K. (eds) 91. Kongreß. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für innere Medizin, vol 91. J.F. Bergmann-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85458-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85458-3_5

  • Publisher Name: J.F. Bergmann-Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8070-0352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85458-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation