Skip to main content

Corruption and trust: a model design

Korruption und Vertrauen – Ein Modellentwurf

  • Chapter
(Dys-)Functionalities of Corruption

Abstract

This article focuses on the interplay between political corruption and trust, both interpersonal and institutional. A model of corruption and trust is tested based on data from Transparency International and the European Social Survey. The European states which have not been yet considered in this context vary widely in the pervasiveness and level of corruption and, thus, offer an excellent case to study this relationship. Both new and established European democracies have experienced episodes of government corruption. Using pooled data from 24 European countries multivariate regressions show that lack of interpersonal trust increases perceived political corruption. Political corruption lowers trust in political institutions. Furthermore, twenty years after the collapse of communism, differences between Western and Central and Eastern European countries still prevail.

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Artikel untersucht das Wechselverhältnis von politischer Korruption und Vertrauen, sowohl auf interpersonaler als auch auf institutioneller Ebene. Basierend auf Daten von Transparency International und dem European Social Survey wird hierfür ein Modell entworfen und getestet. Europäische Staaten, die in diesem Zusammenhang bislang von der Forschung unberücksichtigt blieben, variieren deutlich bezüglich der Verbreitung und dem Grad von Korruption und bieten sich somit für eine Analyse an. Basierend auf gepoolten Daten von 24 europäischen Ländern, zeigen multivariate Regressionsanalysen, dass das Fehlen von interpersonalem Vertrauen die wahrgenommene politische Korruption vergrößert, während Korruption wiederum Vertrauen in Institutionen verringert. Zudem wird deutlich, dass auch 20 Jahre nach dem Zusammenbruch des Kommunismus immer noch Unterschiede zwischen westeuropäischen sowie mittel- und osteuropäischen Ländern herrschen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya V. Tverdova. 2003. Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd, Henri L. F. de Groot, and Anton B. T. M. van Schaik. 2004. Trust and economic growth: A robustness analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 56 (1): 118–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billger, Sherrilyn M., and Rajeev K. Goel. 2009. Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption? Journal of Development Economics 90 (2): 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, John, and Wendy Rahn. 1997. Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catterberg, Gabriela, and Alejandro Moreno. 2005. The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (1): 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Eric C., and Yun-han Chu. 2006. Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies? Journal of Politics 68 (2): 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Michael W. 2002. Explaining corruption: An institutional choice approach. Crime, Law & Social Change 38 (1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles L., Roderic A. Camp, and Kenneth M. Coleman. 2004. The influence of party systems on citizens’ perceptions of corruption and electoral response in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 37 (6): 677–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, Jan. 2002. Korruption in den Bewerberländern zur Europäischen Union: Institutionenqualität und Korruption in vergleichender Perspektive. Arbeitspapier FS III 02–401. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, Jan, and Newton Kenneth. 2003. Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies 5 (2): 93–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, Jan, and Kenneth Newton. 2005. Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review 21 (4): 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, Jan, Kenneth Newton, and Christian Welzel. 2011. How General is Trust in ‘Most People’? A Global Study of Trust Radiuses. Under Review at American Sociological Review (revise & resubmit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Donatella. 2000. Social capital, beliefs in government, and political corruption. In Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral democracies?, ed. Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam, 202–230. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, A. Cooper, Jonathan Krieckhaus, and Michael Lusztig. 2006. Corruption, democracy, and economic growth. International Political Science Review 27 (2): 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2013. Entrenched corruption undercuts democratic development in transitional countries. http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=70&release=401. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, A., and J Teorell. 2005. Assessing alternative indices of democracy. C & M working papers 6, IPSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Russell. 2002. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, John F. 2003. How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling 20 (2): 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Leslie. 2000. Funktionen und Dysfunktionen der Korruption und ihrer Bekämpfung in Mittel- und Osteuropa. In Politische Korruption, ed. Zentrum für Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien, 117–144. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Leslie. 2006. Rotten states? Corruption, post-communism, and neoliberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Leslie. 2009. Crime, organised crime and corruption in post-communist Europe and the CIS. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 42 (2): 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchcroft, Paul D. 1997. The politics of privilege: Assessing the impact of rents, corruption, and clientelism on third world development. Political Studies 45 (3): 639–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Schleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 1997. Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review 87 (2): 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret. 1998. A state of trust. In Trust and governance, eds. Valerie Braithwait and Margaret Levi, 77–101. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, Sofie, and Marc Hooghe. 2011. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law of compliance. European Journal of Political Research 50 (2): 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, Paolo. 1995. Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, Paolo. 1997. Why worry about corruption? Economic Issues 6. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méon, Pierre-Guillaume, and Khalid Sekkat. 2005. Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice 122 (1): 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., and Ola Listhaug. 1999. Political performance and institutional trust. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance, ed. Pippa Norris, 204–216. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, William L., Åse B. Grødeland, and Tatyana Y. Koshechkina, eds. 2001. A culture of corruption? Coping with government in post-communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 2001. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 30–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, Jørgen, and Svend-Erik Skaaning. 2009. Post-communist corruption: In A league of its own? Australian Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 721–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montinola, Gabriella R., and Robert W. Jackman. 2002. Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Alejandro. 2002. Corruption and democracy: A cultural assessment. Comparative Sociology 1 (3–4): 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Stephen D., and Joseph L. Klesner. 2010. Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies 43 (10): 1258–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Kenneth. 2001. Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review 22 (2): 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 1991. Das Dilemma der Gleichzeitigkeit. Demokratisierung und Marktwirtschaft in Osteuropa. Merkur 45:279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, Martin. 2002. The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy 18 (2): 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, Martin, and Gert T. Svendsen. 2001. Missing social capital and the transition from socialism. Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition 5:21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, Susan J. 2000. Official’s misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies. In Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral democracies, eds. Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam, 173–201. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philp, Mark. 2009. Conceptualizing political corruption. In Political corruption. Concepts and contexts. 3rd ed., eds. Arnold J. Heidenheimer and Michael Johnston, 41–57. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, Sean. 2010. The impact of corruption on social trust. American Politics Research 38 (4): 676–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and its alternatives: Understanding post-communist societies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2001. Trust, honesty and corruption: Reflections on the state building process. Archives of European Sociology 42 (3): 526–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo, and Dietlind Stolle. 2002. How political institutions create and destroy social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper prepared for the 98th meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston, MA, August 29-September 2, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo, and Dietlind Stolle. 2003. Social capital, impartiality and the Welfare State: An institutional approach. In Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective, eds. Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle, 191–210. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo, and Eric M. Uslaner. 2005. All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics 58 (1): 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne, and Rein Taagepera. 2005. Corruption, Culture and Communism. International Review of Sociology 15 (1): 109–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne, and William Koetzle. 2000. Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Carsten Q. 2001. Korruption und Vertrauen in Implementationsinstitutionen: Ein Vergleich Lateinamerikas mit konsolidierten Demokratien. In Rechtsstaat und Demokratie, eds. Hans-Joachim Lauth, Michael Becker and Gert Pickel, 275–298. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, Mitchell A. 1999. Nicaraguans talk about corruption: A follow-up study of public opinion. Arlington: Casals and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, Mitchell A. 2002. The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American Countries. Journal of Politics 64 (2): 408–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaaning, Svend E. 2009. Corruption in the post-communist countries: A study of its particularity and diversity. In Totalitarismus und Transformation: Defizite der Demokratiekonsolidierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa, eds. Tutys Jaskulowski, Uwe Backes and Abel Polese, 223–238. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, Margit. 2008. Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being. Comparative Political Studies 41 (12): 1607–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (TI). 2013a. Definition of corruption. http://transparency.org/whatwedo. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • Transparency International (TI). 2013b. Rationale. http://transparency.org.au/index.php/about-us/mission-statement/. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • Treisman, Daniel. 2000. The causes of corruption. A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics 76 (2): 399–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, Daniel. 2007. What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science 10:211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulchin, Joseph S., and Ralph H. Espach. 2000. Combating corruption in Latin America. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urra, Francisco-Javier. 2007. Assessing corruption. An analytic review of corruption measurement and its problems: Perception, error and utility. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan028792.pdf. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • Uslaner, Eric M. 2002. The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, Eric M. 2004. Trust and corruption. In Corruption and the New Institutional Economics, eds. Johann Graf Lambsdorf, Markus Taube and Matthias Schramm, 76–92. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Mark E. 2006. Political corruption as duplicitous exclusion. PS. Political Science and Politics 37 (4): 803–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Shang-Jin, and Yi Wu. 2001. Negative alchemy? Corruption, composition of capital flows, and currency crises. Cid working paper no. 66. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/centers/cid/publications/faculty/wp/066.pdf. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • Welzel, Christian. 2007. Are levels of democracy influenced by mass attitudes? International Political Science Review 28 (4): 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2013. Cost and consequences of corruption. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPUBLICSECTORANDGOVERNANCE/EXTANTICORRUPTION/0,,contentMDK:20221941~menuPK:384473~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:384455,00.html. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • You, Jong-Su. 2005. Corruption and inequality as correlates of social trust: Fairness matters more than similarity. Working paper no. 29. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/hauser/PDF_XLS/workingpapers/workingpaper_29.pdf. Accessed: 18 Mar. 2013.

  • Zak, Paul. J., and Stephen Knack. 2001. Trust and growth. Economic Journal 111 (470): 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Tobias Debiel Andrea Gawrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kubbe, I. (2014). Corruption and trust: a model design. In: Debiel, T., Gawrich, A. (eds) (Dys-)Functionalities of Corruption. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04633-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics