Skip to main content

Resistenz, Ablehnung und Widerstand von Organisationsmitgliedern: Darstellung anhand eines integrativen Innovationsentscheidungsmodells

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Motoren der Innovation
  • 7959 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Organisationaler Wandel ist eine Daueraufgabe. Organisationen müssen ihre Ausrichtung fortwährend den sich verändernden Anforderungen des Marktes anpassen, um erfolgreich zu bleiben. Organisationaler Wandel wird allerdings nur gelingen, wenn alle Organisationsmitglieder die dafür notwendigen Veränderungen mittragen. Die Organisationsforschung widmet sich seit geraumer Zeit Fragen zur Akzeptanz von Innovationen in Organisationen (für eine Übersicht über Technologie-Akzeptanz-Modelle siehe Legris et al., 2003; Venkatesh et al., 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Arts, J. W. C., Frambach, R. T. & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2011): Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: a meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (2): 134–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. & Lee, K.-H. (1999): Consumer resistance to, and acceptance of, innovations. In: Advances in Consumer Research, 26 (1): 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee, A. & Hikmet, N. (2007): Physicians’ resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test. In: European Journal of Information Systems, 16 (6): 725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binsack, M. (2003): Akzeptanz neuer Produkte. Vorwissen als Determinante des Innovationserfolgs. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carnall, C. A. (1986): Toward a theory for the evaluation of organizational change. In: Human Relations, 39 (8): 745–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenfetelli, R. T. (2004): Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. In: Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5 (11–12): 472–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Ployhart, R. E., Thomas, H. C., Anderson, N. & Bliese, P. D. (2011): The power of momentum: A new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. In: Academy of Management Journal, 54 (1): 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. D. & Chang, D. R. (2008): Salesperson’s innovation resistance and job satisfaction in intraorganizational diffusion of sales force automation technologies: The case of South Korea. In: Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (7): 841–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L. & French, J. R. P. (1948): Overcoming resistance to change. In: Human Relations, 1: 512–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, D. W., Chattopadhyay, A. & Gorn, G. J. (1999): The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design. In: Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2): 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, E. & Goldberg, S. (1999): Challenging “resistance to change”". In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35: 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dethloff, C. (2004): Akzeptanz und Nicht-Akzeptanz von technischen Produktinnovationen. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • EI Houssi, A. A., Morel, K. P. & Hultink, E. J. (2005): Effectively Communicating New Product Benefits to Consumers: The Use of Analogy versus Literal Similarity. In: Advances in Consumer Research, 32 (1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1993): Consumer behavior. Orlando: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragher, E. B., Cass, M. & Cooper, C. L. (2005): The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis. In: Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 62(2): 105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H. & Robertson, T. S. (1991): Innovative Decision Processes. In: Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Consumer Behavior: 316-348. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000): A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. In: Journal of Management, 26 (3): 463–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, A-K. (2002): Adoption technologiebasierter Self-Service-Innovationen, Analyse der Wirkungsmechanismen im Entscheidungsprozess der Konsumenten. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, S. & Spieth, P. (2013): Why Innovations Fail - The Case of passive and active Innovation Resistance. In: International Journal of Innovation Management, 17 (5): 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. C. (2005): To adopt or not to adopt – That is the question, 11th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Omaha, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, K. (1991): A model of users’ perspective on change: The case of information systems technology implementation. In: MIS Quarterly, 15 (2): 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-W. & Kankanhalli, A. (2009): Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. In: MIS Quarterly, 33 (3): 567–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen, M., Lee, N. & Wetzels, M. (2009): An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. In: Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (3): 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Königstorfer, J. (2008): Akzeptanz von technologischen Innovationen: Nutzungsentscheidungen von Konsumenten dargestellt am Beispiel von mobilen Internetdiensten, Dissertationsschrift. Gabler: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., Boehm, S. & Bruch, H. (2013): Age, resistance to change, and job performance. In: Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28 (7/8): 741–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labay, D. G. & Kinnear, T. C. (1981): Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems. In: Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (3): 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, L. & Rivard, S. (2005): A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. In: MIS Quarterly, 29 (3): 461–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, T., Sinkkonen, S., Kivijärvi, M. & Laukkanen, P. (2007): Innovation resistance among mature consumers. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24 (7): 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, P., Sinkkonen, S. & Laukkanen, T. (2008): Consumer resistance to internet banking: postponers, opponents and rejectors. In: International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26 (1): 440–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumer, S. & Eckhardt, A. (2012): Why Do People Reject Technologies: A Review of User Resistance Theories. In: Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. R., and Schneberger, S. L. (Hrsg.): Information Systems Theory - Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, 1. In: Integrated Series in Information Systems, 28: 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003): Why Do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Information & Management 40 (3): 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2012): The impact of forced use on customer adoption of self-service technologies. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (4): 1194–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, T. (1998): Akzeptanz innovativer Nutzungsgüter und -systeme: Konsequenzen für die Einführung von Telekommunikations- und Multimediasystemen. Gabler: Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marakas, G. M. & Hornik, S. (1996): Passive resistance misuse: Overt support and covert recalcitrance in is implementation. In: European Journal of Information Systems, 5 (3): 208–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1983): Power, politics, and mis implementation. In: Communications of the ACM, 26 (6): 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Henry, J. W. & Zmud, R. W. (1996): An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. In: Behavior & Information Technology, 15 (5): 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirow, C., Hölzle, K. & Gemünden, H. G. (2007): Systematisierung, Erklärungsbeiträge und Effekte von Innovationsbarrieren. In: Journal für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, 57: 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, C. P., Markman, A. B. & Lehmann, D. R. (2001): ’What Is It?’ Categorization Flexibility and Consumers’ Responses to Really New Products. In: Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (1): 489–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabih, M. I., Bloem, J. G. & Poiesz, T. B. C. (1997): Conceptual issues in the study of innovation adoption behavior. In: Advances in Consumer Research, 24 (1): 190–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreg, S. (2003): Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. In: The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4): 680–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piderit, S. K. (2000): Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. In: Academy of Management Review, 25 (4): 783–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, A. (1996): Leapfrogging bei technischen Innovationen: ein Erklärungsansatz auf Basis der Theorie des wahrgenommenen Risikos. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S. (1989): Successful Innovation Using Strategies to Reduce Consumer Resistance. An Empirical Test. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6 (1): 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S. & Sheth, J. N. (1989): Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6 (2): 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S. & Jung, H.-S. (1991): "Forced" Adoption of Innovations in Organizations: Consequences and Implications. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8 (2): 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003): Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, L. (2006): Sensemaking Throughout Adoption and the Innovation-Decision Process. In: European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (1): 108–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N. (1981): Innovation Resistance. The Less Developed Concept (LDC) in Diffusion Research. In: Research in Marketing, 4: 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speier, C. & Venkatesh. V. (2002): The hidden minefields in adoption of sales force automation technologies. In: Journal of Marketing, 66 (3): 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramony, M. & Holtom, B. C. (2012): The long-term influence of service employee attrition on customer outcomes and profits. In: Journal of Service Research, 15 (4): 460–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, K. & Heidenreich, S. (2014): How to overcome pro-change bias: Incorporating passive and active Innovation Resistance in Innovation Decision Models. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuse, T. & Sekine, M. (2013): Job Dissatisfaction as a Contributor to Stress-related Mental Health Problems among Japanese Civil Servants. In: Industrial Health, 51: 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003): User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. In: MIS Quarterly, 27 (3): 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanberg, C. R. & Banas, J. T. (2000): Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. In: The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (1): 132–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1971): Resistance to change. In: American Behavioral Scientist, 14 (5): 745–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G. & Wallendorf, M. (1983): Consumer behavior: basic findings and management implications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Talke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talke, K., Heidenreich, S. (2014). Resistenz, Ablehnung und Widerstand von Organisationsmitgliedern: Darstellung anhand eines integrativen Innovationsentscheidungsmodells. In: Schultz, C., Hölzle, K. (eds) Motoren der Innovation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06135-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics