Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Rolle des Teamdesigns für die Teamleistung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teamkonstellation und betriebliche Innovationsprozesse

  • 7294 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der demografische Wandel in Deutschland stellt Unternehmen kurz- bis mittelfristig vor die Herausforderung, mit deutlich veränderten Altersstrukturen umzugehen. Für die Arbeit in Innovationsprojekten impliziert diese Entwicklung, dass sich Teammitglieder über ihren kross-funktionalen Hintergrund hinaus, häufig auch stärker hinsichtlich ihres Alters und ihrer Berufserfahrung unterscheiden. Es wird aufgezeigt, dass Veränderungen der Altersstruktur und des Teamdesigns einen geringen – aber nicht zu vernachlässigenden – Einfluss auf die Ergebnisse der Teamarbeit aufweisen. Die Ergebnisse basieren auf einer aktuellen Befragung von Innovationsprojekten aus 290 Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Deutschland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abernathy, W. & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00666.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., & Veen, S. (2013). Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies – large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(3), 279–295. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, R. M. M. (2012). Team roles at work. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. doi:10.1177/1059601102027001003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance eelationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. doi:10.1177/0149206310365001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K., Zanutto, E., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and composition. A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R. B. (2011). Innovation by operating practices in project alliances – when size matters. British Journal of Management, 22(4), 586–608. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8551.2010.00688.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R. B., & Koch, M. J. (2007). The role of innovation orientation: Strategic antecedents and innovation consequences of innovation orientation. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 3(3), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H., Kunze, F., & Böhm, S. (2010). Generationen erfolgreich führen: Konzepte und Praxiserfahrungen zum Management des demografischen Wandels. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., & Lawrence, S. A. (2004). Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 892–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. D., & Hills, T. (2014). Does cognition deteriorate with age or Is It enhanced by experience? Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 2–4. doi:10.1111/tops.12080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group Performance and intergroup relations in organisations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2. Aufl., Bd. 3, S. 269–314). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group Products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 162–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational behavior (S. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (S. 45–99). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1983). Group tasks, group interaction, and group performance effectiveness. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Hrsg.), Small groups and social interaction (Bd. 1, S. 331–345). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A Theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, varity, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (2011). When other people are heaven, when other people are hell: How social identity determines the nature and impact of social support. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Hrsg.), The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being (S. 157–174). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. M., & Todd Stevens, K. (1999). Using Belbin’s leadership role to improve team effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Software, 44(3), 241–250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S 0164-1212(98)10060-2.

  • Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Bezrukova, K., & Thatcher, S. (2008). Conflict, diversity, and faultlines in workgroups. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations (S. 179–210). The SIOP Frontiers Series, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.89.6.1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauring, J., & Selmer, J. (2012). Knowledge sharing in diverse organisations. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(1), 89–105. doi:10.1111/j.1748–8583.2010.00158.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, T. T., & Chen, J. C. (2010). Incremental or radical? A study of organizational innovation: An artificial world approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8193–8200. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Calculating diversity faultlines with the asw.cluster package in R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L. (2013). Composition and diversity. In J. M. Levine (Hrsg.), Group processes (S. 11–32). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. W. J. H. Davis (Hrsg.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 20). Small group processes and interpersonal relations (S. 11–35). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, V. (2006). Simulation of the categorization-elaboration model of diversity and work-group performance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, D. C. (2002). The social psychology of behaviour in small groups. New York: Psychology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, H. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 5–42. doi:10.1111/tops.12078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R. A., Jr., & Mayer, K. U. (1997). The Measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233–261. doi:10.2307/2952551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. E. (1955). Role Differentiation in Small Groups. American Sociological Review, 20(3), 300–310. doi:10.2307/2087389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Beschäftigung und Umsatz der Betriebe des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes. Fachserie 4, Reihe 4.1.1. Wiesbaden: destatis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, S. M. B. (2013). Moving beyond a categorical approach to diversity: The role of demographic faultlines. In Q. M. Roberson (Hrsg.), The oxford handbook of diversity and work (S. 52–72). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217–241. doi:10.1023/a:1023325406946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2008). The Social Identity Perspektive in Intergroup Relations: Theories, Themes, and Controversies. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Hrsg.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (S. 133–152). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., Schmidt, K. H., & Kanfer, R. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1301–1313. doi:10.1037/a0012680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., Jungmann, F., Liebermann, S., Schmidt, K. H., & Ries, B. C. (2011). Altersgemischte Teamarbeit kann erfolgreich sein. Sozialrecht + Praxis, 7, 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. (2008). When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 107(1), 41–59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Strategisches Management und Organisation, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, 95440, Bayreuth, Deutschland

    Martin Ratzmann

Authors
  1. Martin Ratzmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Ratzmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt- Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

    Manfred Bornewasser

  2. Lehrstuhl und Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    Christopher M. Schlick

  3. Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

    Ricarda B. Bouncken

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ratzmann, M. (2015). Die Rolle des Teamdesigns für die Teamleistung. In: Bornewasser, M., Schlick, C., Bouncken, R. (eds) Teamkonstellation und betriebliche Innovationsprozesse. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07386-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07386-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07385-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07386-2

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation