Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competitive authoritarianism in Africa revisited

  • Editorial
  • Chapter
Democratization and Competitive Authoritarianism in Africa

Abstract

Competitive authoritarianism has emerged as a major concept in the study of political regimes. The introduction of this special issue revisits Levitsky and Way’s seminal study Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Although Africa is the world region with the highest absolute number of competitive authoritarian regimes, political scientists working on Africa have rarely engaged with Levitsky and Way’s modern classic. In this introduction, we summarize their arguments, outline the empirical findings for Africa, and review the critiques. In doing so we provide the background for the contributions to this special issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Art, David. 2012. What do we know about Authoritarianism after ten years? Comparative Politics 44 (3): 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejarano, Anna Maria. 2011. Book review of Levitsky and Way (2010). Political Science Quaterly 126 (4): 715–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaards, Matthijs. 2009. How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization 16 (2): 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaards, Matthijs. 2010. Measures of democratization: From degree to type of war. Political Research Quaterly 63 (2): 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaards, Matthijs. 2013. Reexamining African elections. Journal of Democracy 24 (4): 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaards, Matthijs. 2014. Multiparty elections in Africa: For better or worse. In Political parties, party systems and democracy in Africa, eds. Renske Doorenspleet and Lia Nijzink, 22–44. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bours Laborin, Mario. 2011. Mock democracies: Authoritarian cover-ups. Journal of International Affairs 65 (1): 254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, Valerie. 2011. Defeating authoritarian leaders in post-communist countries . New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 2013. Review article: Promoting democracy. Government and Opposition 48 (2): 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, Thomas. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, Nic. 2010. African elections as vehicles for change. Journal of Democracy 21 (4): 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jager, Nicola, and Cara Meintjes. 2013. Winners, losers and the playing field in southern Africa's ‘Democratic Darlings’: Botswana and South Africa compared. Politikon 40 (2): 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2002. Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elischer, Sebastian. 2013. Political parties in Africa. Ethnicity and party formation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, Sofia. 2011. Book review of Levitsky and Way (2010). Comparative Political Studies 44 (7): 935–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombad, Charles. 2012. The African Union and democratization. In Routledge handbook of democratization, ed. Jeffrey Haynes, 322–336. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Edward. 2010. Politics in the periphery: An introduction to subnational authoritarianism and democratization in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2 (2): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, Bruce. 2010. Democratic triumph, scholarly pessimism. Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, Tom. 2014. Legal maneuvers and violence: Law making, protest and semi-authortarianism in Uganda. Development and Change 45 (4): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Terry Lynn. 1995. The hybrid regimes of Central America. Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneuer, Marianne, and Thomas Demmelhuber. 2015. Gravity centres of authoritarian rule: A conceptual approach. Democratization . doi: 10.1080/13510347.2015.1018898 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubik, Jan. 2011. Book review of Levitsky and Way (2010). Slavic Review 70 (3): 660–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBas, Adrienne. 2011. From protest to parties . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven and James Loxton. 2013. Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization 20 (1): 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2002. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the Cold War . New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2012. Beyond patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability. Perspectives on Politics 10 (4): 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2013. The durability of revolutionary regimes. Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2014. Structure vs. choice. Journal of Democracy 25 (4): 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott. 2012. From representative democracy to participatory competitive authoritarianism:

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo Chávez and Venezuelan politics. Perspectives on Politics 10 (4): 955–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matti, Stephanie. 2010. The democratic republic of the Congo? Corruption, patronage, and competitive authoritarianism in the DRC. Africa Today 56 (4): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melber, Henning. 2015. Post-liberation democratic authoritarianism: The case of Namibia. Politikon 42 (1): 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Yonathan. 2012. The era of electoral authoritarianism. World Politics 64 (1): 161–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Yonathan. 2014. Party matters: The institutional origins of competitive hegemony in Tanzania. Democratization 21 (4): 655–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe Schmitter. 2013. Transitions from autocratic rule. Tentative conclusions about uncertain outcomes. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, Robert. 2012. Algeria and the Arab uprisings. In The Arab Spring: Will it lead to democratic transitions?eds. Clement Henry and Ji-Hyang Jang, 56-71. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiffer, Caryn, and Pierre Englebert. 2012. Extraversion, vulnerability to donors, and political liberalization in Africa. African Affairs 111 (444): 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, Danielle. 2013. Urban poverty and party populism in African democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 1998. What is democratic consolidation? Journal of Democracy 9 (2): 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2013. The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg, Michael. 2011. Book review of Levitsky and Way (2010). Democratization 19 (1): 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg, Michael. 2014. Mapping deviant democracies. Democratization 41 (4): 634–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Dan. 2011. Book review of Levitsky and Way (2010). Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiriot, Céline. 2013. Des transitions africaines au monde arabe, 1991-2011: Vent de printemps sur les outils de la transitologie. Revue Internationale De Politique Comparée 20 (2): 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstrup, Jakob. 2013. When can external actors influence democratization? leverage, linkage, and gatekeeper elites. Democratization 20 (4): 716–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, Nicholas. 2002. Elections without democracy. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2012. Between authoritarianism and democracy. Journal of Democracy 23 (1):169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladisavljevic, Nebojsa. 2014. Competitive authoritarianism, and popular protest: evidence from Serbia under Milosevic. International Political Science Review. doi: 10.1177/0192512114535450 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpi, Frédéric. 2013. Algeria versus the Arab Spring. Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Soest, Christian, and Michael Wahman. 2015. Not all dictators are equal: Coups, fraudulent elections, and the selective targeting of democratic sanctions. Journal of Peace Research 52 (1): 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahman, Michael. 2014. Democratization and electoral turnover in Sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. Democratization 21 (2): 220–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, Lucan. 2008. The real causes of the color revolutions. Journal of Democracy 19 (3): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, Lucan. 2009. A reply to my critics. Journal of Democracy 20 (1): 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, Lucan. 2012a. The sources of authoritarian control after the Cold War: East Africa and the former Soviet Union. Post-Soviet Affairs 28 (4): 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, Lucan. 2012b. Dear in headlights: Incompetence and weak authoritarianism after the cold war. Slavic Review 71 (3): 619–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidmann, Nils. 2011. Book review of Levitsky and Way (2010). Journal of Peace Research 48 (6): 81–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, Toni. 2014. Dominant parties and the private sector in Sub-Saharan Africa: A typology of approaches. Comparative Politics and Governance 8 (3-4): 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisemann, John. 1990. Democracy in black Africa: Survival and revival . USA: Paragon House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Prof. Matthijs Bogaards

  2. Department of Political Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

    Asst. Prof. Sebastian Elischer

Authors
  1. Prof. Matthijs Bogaards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asst. Prof. Sebastian Elischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Matthijs Bogaards Sebastian Elischer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bogaards, M., Elischer, S. (2016). Competitive authoritarianism in Africa revisited. In: Bogaards, M., Elischer, S. (eds) Democratization and Competitive Authoritarianism in Africa. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft – Sonderhefte. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09216-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation