Skip to main content

Intercultural Information Ethics: A Pragmatic Consideration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Cultures in the Digital Age

Abstract

Discussions in intercultural information ethics often focus on the problem of the universality of values, an understandable focus since cultures, when face to face with one another as a result of globalization, are bound to conflict over differing values. As information technology greatly facilitates the movement of thoughts and ideas, these clashes happen at an exponentially increasing rate. Such discussions usually occur between those who believe in a set of universal values and those who oppose the idea. Such discussions and debates thus often find themselves in a stalemate; they show every characteristic of an arcane philosophical dispute that does not seem to go anywhere. The following chapter argues for the rejection of the sterile and politicized debates that define the above stalemate. Instead of looking towards which set of values are universal and how are they are going to be justified, or how a set of values can be defended against others values claiming to be universal, the following paper instead proposes that talk of universality and cultural distinctiveness be discarded altogether in favor of asking which set of values serve the existing goals and fit with the desires of the people for a particular period of time and place more than other values. In short, the following paper argues for an abandonment of the question of which values are true and asks instead which values are useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bielby, J. (2015). Comparative philosophies in intercultural information ethics. Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies, 2, 233-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk. D. L. (2007). Privacy and property in the global datasphere. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 94-107). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2005). Privacy: An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 37-47. http://www.capurro.de/privacy.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2006). Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 175-186. http://www.capurro.de/oxford.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2007). Information ethics for and from Africa. International Review of Information Ethics, 7, 6-17. http://www.capurro.de/africa.html

  • Capurro, R. (2008a). Intercultural information ethics: Foundations and applications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 6(2), 116-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2008b). Intercultural information ethics. In K. E. Himma and H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 639-665). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://www.capurro.de/iiebangkok.html

  • Dixon, J. L., & Smalley, M. G. (1981). Jehovah’s Witnesses: The surgical/ethical challenge. Journal of the American Medical Association, 246(21), 2471-2472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C. (2005). Lost in translation. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, W. (2012). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2011). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • History of the Internet. (n.d.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet.

  • Hongladarom, S. (2007). Analysis and justification of privacy from a Buddhist perspective. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 108-122). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongladarom, S. (2009). Privacy, the individual and genetic information: A Buddhist perspective. Bioethics, 23(7), 403-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongladarom, S. (2016). A Buddhist theory of privacy. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongladarom, S., & Britz, J. (2009). Intercultural information ethics. International Review of Information Ethics 11, 2-5. Available at http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/013/013-full.pdf

  • Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. (A. Wood, Trans.). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitiyadisai, K. (2005). Privacy rights and protection: Foreign values in modern Thai context. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü, Y.-H. (2005). Privacy and data privacy issues in contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 7-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.) South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muramoto, O. (1998). Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah’s Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents’ views? Journal of Medical Ethics, 24(4), 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakada, M., & Tamura, T. (2005). Japanese conceptions of privacy: An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 27-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasoota, P. (2000). State surveillance, privacy and social control in Thailand (1350-1998). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelenberg, R. (1990). The blood transfusion taboo of Jehovah’s Witnesses: Origin, development and function of a controversial doctrine. Social Science & Medicine, 31(4), 515–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, G. (2002). Data privacy approaches from US and EU perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 19(2), 193-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. (2010). Information ethics in a different voice, or back to the drawing board of intercultural information ethics. International Review of Information Ethics, 13, 6-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, E. (1932). Ethical relativity. London, United Kingdom: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P.-H. (2009). What should we share?: Understanding the aim of intercultural information ethics. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 50-58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soraj Hongladarom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hongladarom, S. (2016). Intercultural Information Ethics: A Pragmatic Consideration. In: Kelly, M., Bielby, J. (eds) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics