Abstract
Discussions in intercultural information ethics often focus on the problem of the universality of values, an understandable focus since cultures, when face to face with one another as a result of globalization, are bound to conflict over differing values. As information technology greatly facilitates the movement of thoughts and ideas, these clashes happen at an exponentially increasing rate. Such discussions usually occur between those who believe in a set of universal values and those who oppose the idea. Such discussions and debates thus often find themselves in a stalemate; they show every characteristic of an arcane philosophical dispute that does not seem to go anywhere. The following chapter argues for the rejection of the sterile and politicized debates that define the above stalemate. Instead of looking towards which set of values are universal and how are they are going to be justified, or how a set of values can be defended against others values claiming to be universal, the following paper instead proposes that talk of universality and cultural distinctiveness be discarded altogether in favor of asking which set of values serve the existing goals and fit with the desires of the people for a particular period of time and place more than other values. In short, the following paper argues for an abandonment of the question of which values are true and asks instead which values are useful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bielby, J. (2015). Comparative philosophies in intercultural information ethics. Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies, 2, 233-253.
Burk. D. L. (2007). Privacy and property in the global datasphere. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 94-107). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
Capurro, R. (2005). Privacy: An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 37-47. http://www.capurro.de/privacy.html
Capurro, R. (2006). Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 175-186. http://www.capurro.de/oxford.html
Capurro, R. (2007). Information ethics for and from Africa. International Review of Information Ethics, 7, 6-17. http://www.capurro.de/africa.html
Capurro, R. (2008a). Intercultural information ethics: Foundations and applications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 6(2), 116-126.
Capurro, R. (2008b). Intercultural information ethics. In K. E. Himma and H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 639-665). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://www.capurro.de/iiebangkok.html
Dixon, J. L., & Smalley, M. G. (1981). Jehovah’s Witnesses: The surgical/ethical challenge. Journal of the American Medical Association, 246(21), 2471-2472.
Ess, C. (2005). Lost in translation. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 1-6.
Griswold, W. (2012). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harris, S. (2011). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
History of the Internet. (n.d.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet.
Hongladarom, S. (2007). Analysis and justification of privacy from a Buddhist perspective. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 108-122). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
Hongladarom, S. (2009). Privacy, the individual and genetic information: A Buddhist perspective. Bioethics, 23(7), 403-412.
Hongladarom, S. (2016). A Buddhist theory of privacy. Singapore: Springer.
Hongladarom, S., & Britz, J. (2009). Intercultural information ethics. International Review of Information Ethics 11, 2-5. Available at http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/013/013-full.pdf
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. (A. Wood, Trans.). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Kitiyadisai, K. (2005). Privacy rights and protection: Foreign values in modern Thai context. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 17-26.
Lü, Y.-H. (2005). Privacy and data privacy issues in contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 7-15.
Macintyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.) South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Muramoto, O. (1998). Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah’s Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents’ views? Journal of Medical Ethics, 24(4), 223–230.
Nakada, M., & Tamura, T. (2005). Japanese conceptions of privacy: An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 27-36.
Ramasoota, P. (2000). State surveillance, privacy and social control in Thailand (1350-1998). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Singelenberg, R. (1990). The blood transfusion taboo of Jehovah’s Witnesses: Origin, development and function of a controversial doctrine. Social Science & Medicine, 31(4), 515–523
Steinke, G. (2002). Data privacy approaches from US and EU perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 19(2), 193-200.
Weber, K. (2010). Information ethics in a different voice, or back to the drawing board of intercultural information ethics. International Review of Information Ethics, 13, 6-11.
Westermarck, E. (1932). Ethical relativity. London, United Kingdom: Kegan Paul.
Wong, P.-H. (2009). What should we share?: Understanding the aim of intercultural information ethics. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 50-58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hongladarom, S. (2016). Intercultural Information Ethics: A Pragmatic Consideration. In: Kelly, M., Bielby, J. (eds) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14679-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14681-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)