Zusammenfassung
The paper provides a multi-disciplinary overview of normative and empirical issues concerning labor markets and inequalities in contemporary capitalist democracies. It begins with a discussion of philosophical controversies in relation to issues of distributive justice. This is followed by a review of peoples’ attitudes and opinions, as revealed in surveys and experiments, concerning inequality and fairness. In regard to contributions from economics, the question is discussed whether the relationship between equality/equity and efficiency should be seen as a trade-off. Finally, the thesis is advanced that most of the inequalities (for example in relation to income, job quality, job and income security) are reflected in but not caused by labor markets; instead, the institutional framework in which the labor market is embedded (labor law, education, training, wage determination, social security etc.) is responsible for the (in)equality of outcomes, as are managerial strategies positioning jobs and their holders in firms and other organizations. In his brief conclusion, the author refrains from advocating a normative solution to the issue of distributive fairness; instead, he highlights two axes of controversy that structure the debate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution (NBER Working Paper No. 14825). Cambridge/MA.
Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the point of equality ? Ethics, 109, 287 – 337.
Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge/ MA: Harvard University Press.
Fehr, E., Naef, M., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment. AER, 96(5), 1912 – 1917.
Galbraith, J., Conceicao, P., & Ferreira, P. (1999). Inequality and unemployment in Europe: The American cure. New Left Review, 237, 28 – 51.
Halliday, S. (2008). Equality of opportunity. Roemer’s synthesis. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://simon.d.halliday.googlepages.com/EqOp.pdf
Jäntti, M., Roed, K., Naylor, R., Björklund, A., Bratsberg, B., Raaum, O., … Eriksson, T. (2006). American exceptionalism in a new light: A comparison of intergenerational earnings mobility in the nordic countries, the United Kingdom and the United States (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1938). Bonn.
Kymlicka, W. (2006). Left liberalism revisited. In The Egalitarian Conscience. Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen (pp. 9 – 35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
New Economics Foundation. (2009). A Bit Rich: Calculating the real value to society of different professions. Retrieved from http://neweconomics.org/2009/12/a-bitrich/
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Offe, C. (1976). Industry and Inequality. The Achievement Principle in Work and Social Status. London: Edward Arnold.
Pierik, R., & Robeyns, I. (2007). Resources versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory. Political Studies, 55(1), 133 – 152.
Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of What ? In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 1. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Offe, C. (2019). Inequality and the Labor Market – Theories, opinions, models, and practices of unequal distribution and how they can be justified (2010). In: Der Wohlfahrtsstaat und seine Bürger. Ausgewählte Schriften von Claus Offe, vol 2. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22259-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22259-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22258-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22259-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)