Skip to main content

Objects, Belief, and the Sociologist: The Sociology of Art as a Work-To-Be-Done

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roads to Music Sociology

Part of the book series: Musik und Gesellschaft ((MUGE))

Abstract

Creating, playing, listening are not ways of coping with an external object. Music only exists where it takes place: in the musical experience itself. In view of this, writing on music less consists in reporting on a performance than in making it exist differently, by prolongating, connecting, enhancing the experience. Reciprocally, to live such moments necessarily supports any writing on music, even indirectly—including the sociologist’s one. Drawing on authors ranging from Certeau and Marin to James and Souriau may help account for such constitutive relations between writing on music, and loving or practicing it, in modes other than ascetic distancing or poetic waxing. In hindsight, Hennion actually feels that he has less done a sociology of music than written a sociology from music. In a tentative way, here he proposes to connect closely a writing and the experience that it tries to translate, on two cases: learning to sing (a personal experience), and an interview with a jazz player. The latter’s original view of improvisation surprisingly echoes Souriau’s powerful concept of the “work-to-be-done”. The phrase does not banally recall that artworks are always born again, but that unaccomplished worlds call for our support. Far from the prevalent scientism, why would not such a demanding work also concern the sociology of art?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On his return from the United States, Certeau had no post either at a university or at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales and was welcomed for a year by the Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation (CSI). As a very new researcher at the CSI, I had to critique his article ‘Croire: une pratique de la différence’ in his presence, which I did by comparing it with the revival of baroque music.

  2. 2.

    Shortly before his premature death, we invited him to the CSI seminar series to discuss his book L’Opacité de la peinture (1989). I will return to this exceptional work below.

  3. 3.

    As commentators on Weber keep futilely reminding us, his famous warning does not demand that the sociologist stick to the facts and forswear value judgements. It maintains the opposite: since facts and values are inseparable, the sociologist’s duty is to make her values explicit and public, thus creating the possibility of choosing other values, rather than dissimulating them beneath neutral statements that claim to be factual. Thus, I. Kalinowski (2005) prefers to talk of the ‘non-imposition of values’ while J.-P. Grossein in his discussion of the French translation of Gesinnung as disposition rightly emphasizes the kinship between Weber and pragmatism.

  4. 4.

    ‘Treating art as not so very different from other kinds of work’ (Art Worlds 1982, pp. ix–x).

  5. 5.

    L’œuvre de l’art—the ‘work of the art’, and not The Work of Art as the English title (1997) says—is the elegant title of G. Genette’s book in French, by which he means the ongoing work, the putting into motion, the ‘getting something done’ that can only be grasped in an infinite series of revisits and reworkings. I will come back to this theme with Souriau.

  6. 6.

    To speak of involving objects without speaking of them, authors in the social sciences have become virtuoso preface writers in which they reveal their personal considerations before continuing, in the company of their anonymous reader, an equally anonymous work that is thus exempted from such considerations.

  7. 7.

    The word is probably fitting, provided that we take it in James’ rehabilitated meaning of belief as a necessary and primal relationship with the world, including in the scientific method: see ‘The Will to Believe’ (1897).

  8. 8.

    On the origins of sociology as a theory of belief, see Hennion (2015a, chap. 1, ‘Lasting Things’, pp. 15–38).

  9. 9.

    This is the power of the [REP] mode proposed by Latour in his inquiry into modes of existence (2013).

  10. 10.

    Callon defends the French term agencement, which he takes from Deleuze (Callon 2013, pp. 425–426), as being greatly preferable to the inert and undifferentiated assemblage used in English translations (and now used back in French!). Playing a sonata, running a 100-metre race, cooking, looking after the sick or making a park bloom is to endlessly sculpt myriad details, each of which enables the others to stand out more, and to serve in their turn as footholds—all of which is better suggested by the term agencement. Reciprocally, the precious English word ‘agency’ has no easy French translation.

  11. 11.

    English is reluctant to expressions with no subject or object: a ‘make do’ refers both to objects that make us do something, and to us making things do something (Gomart and Hennion 1999; Latour 1999).

  12. 12.

    See Hennion and Monnin (2015). I owe much to the young philosopher Alexandre Monnin in our joint rereading of a difficult author. Monnin was already the source of the interview reprinted in Hennion (2016). On Souriau, see also the perceptive texts by I. Stengers (2007) and D. Lapoujade (2011).

  13. 13.

    Apart from Eco (1981, 1989), mentioned above, see e.g. Iser (1980) and Jauss (1982).

  14. 14.

    On this subject, see the critical review of the use of the term performance in Hennion (2014).

  15. 15.

    ‘The work’s complete trajectory, from its first appearance to its achievement (which is total alienation), cannot be considered an execution or expression or gradual manifestation of an original project: to believe that would be to be unaware of and abolish the efficacy of the acts of this dialectical progress by question-and-answers’ (Souriau 1955, p. 257).

  16. 16.

    He is referencing Caravaggio’s The Calling of Saint Matthew, which represents the saint as a stenographer busy writing down an angel’s dictation.

  17. 17.

    ‘The power to create oneself and the act of doing so exist even in beings who … seem to have been created by others, such as works of art’ (Souriau 1955, pp. 279–280).

References

  • Becker, Howard S. (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, Nicolas (1998) Esthétique relationnelle. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, Yves (2004) L’art à l’état gazeux. Paris: Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateau, Dominique (2009) L’art comptant pour un. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel (2013) “Qu’est-ce qu’un agencement marchand?”, in: Callon, Michel et al. (eds.) Sociologie des agencements marchands. Paris: Presses de l’École des Mines, 425–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel (1992) The Writing of History. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto (1989) The Open Work. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto (1981) The Role of the Reader. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press and Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet, Jean-Marie / Hennion, Antoine (2000) La Grandeur de Bach. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourmentraux, Jean-Pierre (ed.) (2012) L’Ère post-média. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard (1997) The Work of Art: Immanence and Transcendence. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomart, Émilie, / Hennion, Antoine (1999) “A Sociology of attachment: Music amateurs, drug users”, in: Law, John, / Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, 220–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2004) “Pragmatics of taste”, in: Jacobs, Marc / Hanrahan, Nancy (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2007) “Those things that hold us together: taste and sociology”, in: Cultural Sociology 1/1, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2010) “La mémoire et l’instant. Improvisation sur un thème de Denis Laborde”, in: Tracés, 18, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2012) “‘As fast as one possibly can…’: Virtuosity, a truth of musical performance?”, in: Hawkins, Stan (ed.) Critical Musicological Reflections. Essays in honour of Derek B. Scott. Farnham: Ashgate, 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2014) “Playing, Performing, Listening. Making music—or making music act?”, in: Marshall, Lee, / Laing, Dave (eds.) Popular Music Matters: Essays in Honour of Simon Frith. Farnham: Ashgate, 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2015a) The Passion for Music. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2015b) Enquêter sur nos attachements. Comment hériter de William James? See http://sociologies.revues.org/4953 [22.11.2017].

  • Hennion, Antoine (2016) “From ANT to pragmatism: A Journey with Bruno Latour at the CSI”, in: New Literary History 47 (2/3), 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine (2017) “Attachments, you say…? How a concept collectively emerges in one research group”, in: Journal of Cultural Economy 10 (1), 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, Antoine / Monnin, Alexandre (2015) “Sous la dictée de l’ange. Enquêter sous le signe d’Étienne Souriau”, in: Courtois-l’Heureux, Fleur / Wiame, Aline (eds.), Étienne Souriau. Une ontologie de l’instauration. Paris: Vrin, 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfgang (1980) The Act of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William (1979 [1897]) The Will to Believe, ed. Frederick Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers and Ignas K. Skrupskelis, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William (1977 [1909a]) A Pluralistic Universe, ed. by Fredson Bowers, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William (1909b) The Meaning of Truth. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William (1976 [1912]) The Works of William James: Essays in Radical Empiricism, ed. by Burkhardt, Frederick / Bowers, Fredson. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauss, Hans R. (1982) Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, Irène (2005) “Leçons wéberiennes sur la science et la propagande”. Introduction in: Weber, Max [1919] La Science, profession et vocation. Marseille: Agone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapoujade, David (2011) “Étienne Souriau. Une philosophie des existences moindres”, in Debaise, Didier (ed.) Philosophie des possessions. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel, 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1999) “Factures/Fractures: From the Concept of Network to the Concept of Attachment”, in: RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 36 (Autumn), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Louis (1989) Opacité de la peinture, Paris: Usher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souriau, Étienne (1955) L’ombre de Dieu. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souriau, Étienne (1956) “Du mode d’existence de l’œuvre à faire”, in Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, 50 (1), 25 February 1956: 4–24 (reprinted in Souriau, Étienne (2009), Les différents modes d’existence. Paris: PUF, 195–217).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, Isabelle (2007) ‘William James: une éthique de la pensée?’, in: Debaise, Didier (ed.) Vie et expérimentation. Peirce, James, Dewey. Paris: Vrin, 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, David (1978) Ways of the Hand: the organization of improvised conduct. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teil, Geneviève / Hennion, Antoine (2004) “Discovering quality or performing taste? A sociology of the amateur”, in: Harvey, Mark / McMeekin, Andrew / Warde, Alan (eds.) Theoretical Approaches to Food Quality. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teil, Geneviève / Hennion, Antoine (2011) Le vin et l’environnement. Paris: Presses de l’École des Mines.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Hennion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hennion, A. (2019). Objects, Belief, and the Sociologist: The Sociology of Art as a Work-To-Be-Done. In: Smudits, A. (eds) Roads to Music Sociology. Musik und Gesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22279-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22279-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22278-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22279-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics