Skip to main content

The Experience of the Swiss Negotiated Approach

Borders as a Challenge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance

Abstract

Within the framework of its sectoral plan procedure for deep geological repositories, Switzerland has been searching for disposal sites for its radioactive waste since 2008. Regional conferences as central elements of a regional participatory process have accompanied the national site search since 2011. The exploration and narrowing down of the number of potential geological sites has been proceeding step-by-step in 3 stages and will continue to do so over a time of two decades at the least. In the meantime, the selected site areas lie, without exception, on the border to Germany. In order to let the public participate in the selection process, site regions were defined and negotiated upon prior to the outset of the participatory process. Within these, the participation areas for the envisioned individual regional waste disposal projects were circumscribed in accordance with potential geological storage areas. The lines were drawn along township boundaries; indeed, the Swiss site search has placed the affected townships in the center of public participation. From the start, Switzerland has included those German townships lying in immediate proximity to its designated site areas in the participatory process. The small size of the site regions, the exclusion of additional affected neighbours and conflicting interests amongst the participants have proven over the years to be stumbling blocks which have again and again placed a strain on communication and cooperation across regional borders and the German-Swiss frontier as well. When trying to solve the national quandary of radioactive waste disposal, it is of decisive importance that the people affected are involved fairly, justly, and on equal footing. This is an aspiration difficult to achieve once a border to a neighbouring country is brought into the equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BFE (2013). Faktenblatt Standortregionen, Sachplan geologische Tiefenlager, Etappe 2, 31. März 2013, Bundesamt für Energie.

    Google Scholar 

  • BFE (2017). Sachplan geologische Tiefenlager. Zusammenfassender Bericht über die Auswirkungen geologischer Tiefenlager auf Mensch und Umwelt, 22. November 2017, Bundesamt für Energie.

    Google Scholar 

  • BFE (2018). Sachplan geologische Tiefenlager. Konzept regionale Partizipation in Etappe 3, 14. September 2018, Bundesamt für Energie.

    Google Scholar 

  • BfE (2018). Bundesamt für kerntechnische Entsorgungssicherheit, Informationsveranstaltung zur Endlagersuche in der Schweiz – Dokumentation, Stadthalle Tiengen, 30. Januar 2018, https://www.bfe.bund.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/BfE/DE/2018/180130-veranstaltungdoku.html, last accessed 3rd July 2018.

  • Brunnengräber, A. (2019). Ewigkeitslasten. Die „Endlagerung“ radioaktiver Abfälle als soziales, politisches und wissenschaftliches Projekt – eine Einführung, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A.; Di Nucci, M. R.; Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Mez, L. and Schreurs, M. (Eds.) (2015). Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Vol. I), Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A.; Di Nucci, M. R.; Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Mez, L. and Schreurs, M. (Eds.) (2018). Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Volume II), Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudla, W. (2016). Exemplarische Ermittlung von betroffenen Teilgebieten / Regionen in der Phase 1 bei einer Standortauswahl für ein Endlager und Auswirkungen auf die Bürgerbeteiligung. Entwurf 1, Kommission Lagerung hoch radioaktiver Abfallstoffe, K-Drs. /AG1-63 KDrs./AG3-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitfaden Abgeltungen (2017): Verhandlungsrahmen („Leitfaden“) für den Verhandlungsprozess von Abgeltungen / Kompensationen, Zürich, 22. September 2017, http://www.bfe.admin.ch/themen/00511/01432/06821/index.html?lang=de&dossier_id=06862, last accessed 26 November 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Steinebrunner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steinebrunner, M. (2019). The Experience of the Swiss Negotiated Approach. In: Brunnengräber, A., Di Nucci, M. (eds) Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance. Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27107-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics