Skip to main content
  • 1164 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Media management is a young academic field that has yet to establish a universally accepted set of theoretical foundations (Küng 2007, Mierzejewska & Hollifield 2006). Albeit its strong growth in academic teaching and scholarly output, it remains a confused field. The field is neither clearly defined nor cohesively organized. It remains rather a loose agglomeration of work by researchers from various scientific fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Albarran, Alan B. (2006). Historical Trends and Patterns in Media Management Research (pp. 23-36). In Alan B. Albarran, Sylvia Chan-Olmsted, & Michael O. Wirth. (Eds). Handbook of Media Management and Economics (pp. 3-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarran, Alan B. (2008). Defining Media Management. The International Journal of Media Management, 10(4), 184-186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aris, Annett, & Bughin, Jacques (2012). Managing Media Companies: Harnessing Creative Value (2nd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballon, Pieter (2014). Old and New Issues in Media Economics. In Karen Donders, Caroline Pauwels, & Jan Loisen (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy (pp. 70-95). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Stuart, & Flew, Terry (2015). Reconsidering Media Economics: From Orthodoxies to Heterodoxies. Media Industries Journal, 2(1) ISSN: 2373-9037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Stuart, Flew, Terry, & Swift, Adam (2015). Media Economics. London and New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, Mark (2016). Managing Media Workers. In Gregory F. Lowe, & Charles Brown (Eds.), Managing Media Firms and Industries. What’s So Special About Media Management? (pp. 329-343). Heidelberg et al.: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Gillian (2013). Understanding Media Economics (2nd ed.). London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Peter E., & Peng, Ti-Ching (2012). Brands of economics and the trojan horse of pluralism. Review of Political Economy, 24(3), 451-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, Jonathan (2014). Critical Political Economy of the Media: An Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens, Timothy, Lotz, Amanda D., & Tinic, Serra (2009). Critical Media Industry Studies: A Research Approach. Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(2), 234-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Jennifer, & Perren, Alisa (2009). Introduction: Does the World Really Need One More Field of Study? In Jennifer Holt, & Alisa Perren (Eds.), Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method (pp. 1-17). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, David (2009). Politics, Theory, and Method in Media Industries Research. In Jennifer Holt, & Alisa Perren (Eds.), Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method (pp. 245-256). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, Matthias (2003). Medienmanagement als Stakeholder Management. In Gerrit Brösel, & Frank Keuper (Hrsg.), Medienmanagement. Aufgaben und Lösungen (S. 413-431). München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, Matthias, & Kraus, Daniela (2014). Strategies for stakeholder management and crowdsourcing. In Michal Glowacki, & Lizzie Jackson (Eds.), Public media management for the twenty-first century (pp. 59-81). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, Matthias, Diehl, Sandra, & Koinig, Isabell (2014). Medienökonomie und Medienmanagement als Integrationsdiziplinen – Vom Objektbereich zur Heuristik. In Matthias Karmasin, Matthias Rath, & Barbara Thomaß (2014). Kommunikationswissenschaft als Integrationsdisziplin (S. 75-95). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, Lucy (2007). Does media management matter? Establishing the scope, rationale, and future research agenda for the discipline. Journal of Media Business Studies, 4(1), 21-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küng, Lucy (2010). Why Media Managers are not interested in Media Management - And What We Could Do About It. The International Journal on Media Management, 12, 55-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241270903558467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, Stephen, & Bauer, Johannes M. (2006). Future Directions for Media Economics Research. In Alan B. Albarran, Sylvia Chan-Olmsted, & Michael O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 655-675). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Jordan (2009). An Industry Perspective: Calibrating the Velocity of Change. In Jennifer Holt, & Alisa Perren (Eds.), Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method (pp. 256-264). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mierzejewska, Bozena I. (2011). Media Management in Theory and Practice. In Mark Deuze (Ed.), Managing Media Work (pp. 13-31). London: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mierzejewska, Bozena I., & Hollifield, C. Ann (2006). Theoretical Approaches in Media Management Research. In Alan B. Albarran, Sylvia Chan-Olmsted, & Michael O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 37-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, Paul C. (2016). Connected television: media convergence, industry structure and corporate strategies. In Elisa L. Cohen (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 40. Published Annually for the International Communication Association, Routledge, New York (forthcoming).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioural science. American Economic Review, 49(3), 253-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvie, George, LeBlanc Wicks, Jan, Hollifield, C. Ann, Lacy, Stephen, & Broadrick Sohn, Ardyth (2008), Media Management: A Casebook Approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 486-489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winseck, Dave (2011). The Political Economies of the Media and the Transformation of the Global Median Industries. In Dave Winseck, & Dal Yong Jin (Eds.), The Political Economies of the Media: The Transformation of the Global Media Industries (pp. 3-48). London: Bloombury Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, Bernd W. (2013). Media- and Internetmanagement, 7. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A. (2004). Business models. A strategic management approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The Property Rights Paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 33, 16-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmeppen, K.-D. (2014). Der Journalismus ist kein Geschäftsmodell – und wird nie eines werden. In: F. Lobigs, & G. von Nordheim (2014). Journalismus ist kein Geschäftsmodell. Aktuelle Studien zur Ökonomie und Nicht-Ökonomie des Journalismus (S. 17-31). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmeppen, K.-D. (2011). Medienökonomisch handeln in der Mediengesellschaft. Eine Mikro-Meso-Makro-Skizze anhand der Ökonomisierung der Medien. In: T. Quandt, & B. Scheufele (Hrsg.), Ebenen der Kommunikation. Mikro-Meso-Makro-Links in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 233-258). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmeppen, K.-D. (2008). Ökonomisierung der Medienunternehmen: Gesellschaftlicher Trend und sektorspezifischer Sonderfall. In: A. Maurer, & U. Schimank (Hrsg.), Die Gesellschaft der Unternehmen - Die Unternehmen der Gesellschaft (S. 237-251). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, T., & Brem, A. (2013). Digitale Ökosysteme und deren Geschäftsmodelle: Analyse und Implikationen für klassische Buchverlage. In: F. Keuper, K. Hamaidian, E. Verwaayen, T. Kalinowski, & C. Kraijo (Hrsg.), Digitalisierung und Innovation. Planung - Entstehung - Entwicklungsperspektiven (S. 91-123). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, J. (2010). Neue Geschäftsmodelle aus der Konvergenz der Medien – Transaktions- und Werbeumsätze treiben das Zusammenwachsen der Medien- und Kommunikationsindustrie. In: A. Picot, & A. Freyberg (Hrsg.), Media Reloaded, (S. 85-95). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 156-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C., Demil, B., Lecocq, X., & MacMillan, I. (2010). Business Models. Special Issue. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 143-462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, P. (2002). Free daily newspapers - Business models and strategies. International Journal on Media Management, 4(3), 180-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage. A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieger, T., zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D., & Krys, C. (2011). Innovative Geschäftsmodelle Konzeptionelle Grundlagen, Gestaltungsfelder und unternehmerische Praxis. Heidelberg et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieger, T., Bickhoff, N., & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2002). Einleitung. In: T. Bieger, N. Bickhoff, R. Caspers, D. zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, & K. Reding (Hrsg.), Zukünftige Geschäftsmodelle: Konzept und Anwendung in der Netzökonomie (S. 1-11). Berlin et al.: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, R., Bonfadelli, H., Imhof, K., Jarren, O. (2011). Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E., & Penard, T. (2006). The economics of digital business models: A framework for analysing the economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 81-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. (2004). Erfolgsfaktoren von Spielfilmen im Kino. Eine Übersicht der empirischen betriebswirtschaftlichen Literatur. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(2), 250-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daidj, N. (2011). Media convergence and business ecosystems. Global Media Journal, 11(19), 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Zotto, C., Dichamp, E., & Sommer, C. (2012). Alte Rezepte und neue Geschäftsmodelle: Die Medienkrise aus Sicht der Verlage. In: W. Meier, H. Bonfadelli, & J. Trappel (Hrsg.), Gehen in den Leuchttürmen die Lichter aus?: was aus den Schweizer Leitmedien wird (S. 189-207). Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapp, T. F., & Heine, V. (2014). Big Data. Die ungezähmte Macht. www.dbresearch.com.

  • Detering, D. (2001). Ökonomie der Medieninhalte. Allokative Effizienz und soziale Chancengleichheit in den Neuen Medien. Münster: LIT. Zugl.: Münster, Univ., Diss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewenter, R., & Rösch, J. (2015). Einführung in die neue Ökonomie der Medienmärkte: Eine wettbewerbsökonomische Betrachtung aus Sicht der Theorie der zweiseitigen Märkte, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewenter, R. (2006). Two-sided markets. MedienWirtschaft, 3(2), 57-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogruel, L. (2013). Eine kommunikationswissenschaftliche Konzeption von Medieninnovationen, Begriffsverständnis und theoretische Zugänge. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The Practice of Management. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, M., & Senft, C. (2012). Digitale Ökosysteme. Neue Werttreiber in der Medienwirtschaft. In: C. Kolo, T. Döbler, & L. Rademacher (Hrsg.), Wertschöpfung durch Medien im Wandel (S. 103-118). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2015). The antitrust analysis of multi-sided platform businesses. In: R. Blair, & D. Sokol (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Antitrust Economics, Oxford University Press: Oxford or University of Chicago Institute for Law / Economics Olin Research Paper No. 623. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1482&context=law_and_economics. (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Furhoff, L. (1973). Some Reflections on Newspaper Concentration. The Scandinavian Economic History Review, 21, 1-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J. J., Resende, J., & Sonnac, N. (2015). Media as multi-sided platforms. In: R. G. Picard, & S.S. Wildman (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Media (pp. 3-36). Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gläser, M. (2014). Medienmanagement (3. Aufl.). München: Vahlen Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisold, A. (2001). Ökonomisierung der Medienindustrie aus wirtschaftspolitischer Perspektive. Medien Journal (Hrsg.), Themenheft „Ökonomisierung der Medienindustrie: Ursachen, Formen und Folgen“, 49(2), 237-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, V., & Schwarz, E. J. (2013). Business Modelling and Convergence. In: S. Diehl, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), Media and Convergence Management (S. 9-25). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, K. E. (1978). The Circulation Spiral and the Principle of Household Coverage. The Scandinavian Economic History Review, 26, 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacklin, F., Battistini, B., & von Krogh, G. (2013). Strategic Choices in Converging Industries. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(1), 65-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, B. (2004). Desintegration und Reintegration im Mediensektor. Wie sich Geschäftsmodelle durch Digitalisierung verändern. In: A. Zerdick, A. Picot, K. Schrape, J.-C. Burgelman, R. Silverstone, V. Feldmann, D. K. Heger, & C. Wolff (Hrsg.), E-merging media. Kommunikation und Medienwirtschaft der Zukunft (S. 33-57). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, B. (2002). Geschäftsmodelle von Medienunternehmen: Ökonomische Grundlagen und Veränderungen durch neue Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, J. (2004). Ökonomisierung aus volkswirtschaftlicher Perspektive. Medien Journal (2001). Themenheft „Ökonomisierung der Medienindustrie: Ursachen, Formen und Folgen“, 49. Jg., Heft 2 (S. 159-167). Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, J. (2001). Medienökonomie, Bd. 1: Mediensystem, Zeitung, Zeitschrift, Anzeigenblatt (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarren, O., & Vogel, M. (2009). Gesellschaftliche Selbstbeobachtung und Ko-Orientierung: Die Leitmedien der modernen Gesellschaft. In: D. Müller, L. Annemone, & P. Gendolla (Hrsg.), Leitmedien. Konzepte – Relevanz – Geschichte (S. 71-92). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, M., Diehl, S., & Koinig, I. (2014). Medienökonomie und Medienmanagement als Integrationsdiziplinen – Vom Objektbereich zur Heuristik. In: M. Karmasin, M. Rath, & B. Thomaß (2014). Kommunikationswissenschaft als Integrationsdisziplin (S. 75-95). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, M., Knoche, M., & Winter, C. (2001). Medienwirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Bd.1, Medienunternehmen und die Kommerzialisierung von Öffentlichkeit, Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuper, F., Hamaidian, K., Verwaayen, E., Kalinowski, T., & Kraijo, C. (2013), Digitalisierung und Innovation. Planung - Entstehung - Entwicklungsperspektiven. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuper, F., & Hans, R. (2006). Geschäftsmodelle – Erlösformen in der Medienbranche. In C. Scholz (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienmanagement (S. 393-417). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M. L. (2011). Die schwierige Finanzierung des Journalismus. Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59(1), 5-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M. L. (2010). Die Finanzierungssysteme von Medien. In: M. L. Kiefer (Hrsg.), Medienökonomik. Einführung in eine ökonomische Theorie der Medien (3. Aufl.) (S. 299-335). Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, H. J., Nilssen, T., & Sorgard, L. (2009). Business models for media firms. Does competition matter for how they raise revenue? Marketing Science, 28(6), 1112-1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klang, D., Wallnöfer, M., & Hacklin, F. (2014). The business model paradox: a systematic review and exploration of antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 454-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, M. (2014). Befreiung von kapitalistischen Geschäftsmodellen. Entkapitalisierung von Journalismus und Kommunikationswissenschaft aus Sicht einer Kritik der politischen Ökonomie der Medien. In: F. Lobigs, & G. von Nordheim (Hrsg.), Journalismus ist kein Geschäftsmodell. Aktuelle Studien zur Ökonomie und Nicht-Ökonomie des Journalismus. (S. 241-266). Nomos: Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, M. (2002). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Medienökonomie als Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie der Medien. In: G. Siegert (Hrsg.), Medienökonomie in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Bedeutung, Grundfragen und Entwicklungsperspektiven. Manfred Knoche zum 60. Geburtstag (S. 101-109). Münster u.a.: LIT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, M. (2001). Kapitalisierung der Medienindustrie aus politökonomischer Perspektive. In: Medien Journal (2001). Themenheft „Ökonomisierung der Medienindustrie: Ursachen, Formen und Folgen“, 49. Jg., Heft 2 (S. 177-194). Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, T. (2011). E-Business Grundlagen elektronischer Geschäftsprozesse in der Net Economy (4. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labes, S., Hahn, C., Erek, K., & Zarnekow, R. (2013). Geschäftsmodelle im Cloud Computing. In: F. Keuper, K. Hamaidian, E. Verwaayen, T. Kalinowski, & C. Kraijo (Hrsg.), Digitalisierung und Innovation. Planung – Entstehung – Entwicklungsperspektiven (S. 35-61). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S. (1992). The Financial Commitment Model of News Media Competition. Journal of Media Economics, 5, 5-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobigs, F., & Nordheim, G. von (2014). Journalismus ist kein Geschäftsmodell. Aktuelle Studien zur Ökonomie und Nicht-Ökonomie des Journalismus. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobigs, F. (2013). Finanzierung des Journalismus. In: K. Meier, & C. Neuberger (Hrsg.), Journalismusforschung. Stand und Perspektiven (S. 53-74). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. (1998). Zur Ökonomie der Medien: Zwischen Marktversagen und Querfinanzierung. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. (1996). Wie sich publizistische Hochkultur ‚rechnet‘. Ein ökonomisches Porträt der ‚Zeit‘. Publizistik, 41, 277-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, W. A., & Jarren, O. (2001). Ökonomisierung und Kommerzialisierung von Medien und Mediensystem. Einleitende Bemerkungen zu einer (notwendigen) Debatte. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 49(2), 145-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S., & Brösel, G. (2013). Herausforderungen für das Controlling in der TIME-Branche vor dem Hintergrund wachsender Konvergenz am Beispiel des Risikocontrollings. In: F. Keuper, A. Vocelka, & M. Häfner (Hrsg.), Die moderne Finanzfunktion. Strategien, Organisation und Prozesse (S. 385-415). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanich, G. W. (2006). Media finance and valuation. In: A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 601-621). Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. S. (1978). The external control of organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Plinke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2005). Money, Media and the public interest. In: G. Overholser, & K.H. Jamieson, (Eds.), The Press (pp. 337-350). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2002). The economics and financing of media companies, New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppis, M., & Künzler, M. (2011). Formen der Medienfinanzierung und Medienförderung. SwissGIS – Swiss Centre for Studies on the Global Information Society. Zürich: IPMZ – Institut für Publizistikwissenschaft und Medienforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2014). Digital News Report 2014. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/. (aufgerufen am 5.3.2015).

  • Rizzuto, R. J. (2006). Issues in financial management. In: A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M.O. Wirth (eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 145-159). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ-Mohl, S. (2014). Der Abwärtstrend gefährdet die Demokratie. http://de.ejo-online.eu/13174/medienokonomie/abwaertstrend-gefaehrdet-die-demokratie (v. 7.11.2014).

  • Schallmo, D. R. A. (2014). Kompendium Geschäftsmodell-Innovation. Grundlagen, aktuelle Ansätze und Fallbeispiele zur erfolgreichen Geschäftsmodell-Innovation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallmo, D. R. A. (2013). Grundlagen der Geschäftsmodell-Innovation. Wiesbaden: Springer-Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schierenbeck, H. (2003). Grundzüge der Betriebswirtschaftslehre (6. Aufl.). München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoder, D. (2011). Erlösmodelle für Internet-basierte Medien. Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Rundfunkökonomie an der Universität zu Köln, Heft 279, Köln. http://www.rundfunk-institut.uni-koeln.de. (aufgerufen am 15.4.2015).

  • Schulz, W., Kaserer, C., & Trappel, J. (2008). Finanzinvestoren im Medienbereich. Gutachten im Auftrag der Direktorenkonferenz der Landesmedienanstalten. Berlin: Vistas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, N., & Schwertzel, U. (2006). Finanzierung - Formen, Modelle und Perspektiven In: C. Scholz (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienmanagement (S. 859-877). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, G. (2010). Online Kommunikation und Werbung. In: W. Schweiger, & K. Beck (Hrsg.), Handbuch-Online Kommunikation (S. 434-461). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, G. (2003). Im Zentrum des Taifuns. Die Ökonomisierung als treibende Kraft des medialen Wandels? Medien Journal, 1/2003, S. 20-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, G. (2001). Ökonomisierung der Medien aus systemtheoretischer Perspektive. In: Medien Journal (2001). Themenheft „Ökonomisierung der Medienindustrie: Ursachen, Formen und Folgen“, 49. Jg., Heft 2 (S. 167-177). Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, G., Meier, W. A., & Trappel, J. (2005). Auswirkungen der Ökonomisierung auf Medien und Inhalte. In: H. Bonfadelli, O. Jarren, & G. Siegert (Hrsg.), Einführung in die Publizistikwissenschaft (S. 469-494). Bern u.a.: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Størsul, T., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2013). Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjurts, I. (2011). Erlösmodelle im Medienbereich. In: Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Lexikon Medienwirtschaft. Ökonomische, kommunikationswissenschaftliche, juristische und technische Grundbegriffe (2. Aufl.) (S. 170). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjurts, I. (2004). Vom Mono-Erlösmodell zur multiplen Erlösstruktur. Handlungsoptionen im deutschen Fernsehmarkt 2003. In: P. Radke, & S. Ottler (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Strategien von Medienunternehmen – Ergebnisse der Ravensburger Mediengespräche (S. 33-43). München: Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiera, B. (1999). „Preisdifferenzierung“. In: S. Albers, M. Clement, & K. Peters (Hrsg.), Marketing mit Interaktiven Medien-Strategien zum Markterfolg (S. 283-296). Frankfurt/Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stähler, P. (2001). Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Ökonomie. Merkmale, Strategien und Auswirkungen. Köln-Lohmar: Eul Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2014). Journalismus, wer soll das bezahlen? DerStandard.at (v. 30. Juni 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2001). Ökonomisierung aus der Sicht der Online-Medien. In: Medien JournalZeitschrift für Kommunikationskultur (Hrsg.), Themenheft „Ökonomisierung der Medienindustrie: Ursachen, Formen und Folgen“, 49. Jg., Heft 2 (S. 227-236). Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Rimscha, B. M. (2015). Business Models of Media Industries: Describing and Promoting Commodification. In: G. F. Lowe, & C. Brown (Eds.), Managing Media Firms and Industries. What’s So Special About Media Management? (pp. 207-223). Heidelberg at el.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Rimscha, B. M. (2012). Geschäftsmodelle für Social Media. In: P. Grimm, & O. Zöllner (Hrsg.), Schöne neue Kommunikationswelt oder Ende der Privatheit? (S. 297-311). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzlaff, K., Kramp, L., Novy, L., & Ballwieser, D. (2013). Journalismus in der digitalen Moderne. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W. (2015). Business Model Management: Design - Instrumente - Erfolgsfaktoren von Geschäftsmodellen (5. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W. (2013). Medien- und Internetmanagement (8. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W., & Pelz, R. (2006). Wertschöpfungsstrukturen und Zielsysteme in Medienunternehmen. In: C. Scholz (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienmanagement (S. 261-278). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W. (2001). Electronic Business. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerdick, A., Picot, A., Schrape, K., Artopé, A., Goldhammer, K., Heger, D. K. Lange, U., Vierkant, E., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Silverstone, R. (1999). Die Internet-Ökonomie. Strategien für die digitale Wirtschaft. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model. Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D., van Hettinga, E., Harren, H., & Franke, T. (2011). Das Erlösmodell als Teilkomponente des Geschäftsmodells. In: T. Bieger, D. zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, & C. Krys (Hrsg.), Innovative Geschäftsmodelle. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen, Gestaltungsfelder und unternehmerische Praxis (S. 163-184). Berlin et al.: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmeppen, K.-D. (2012). Einseitige Tauschgeschäfte: Kriterien der Beschränkung journalistischer Autonomie durch kommerziellen Druck. In: O. Jarren, M. Künzler, & M. Puppis (Hrsg.), Medienwandel oder Medienkrise? Folgen für Medienstrukturen und ihre Erforschung (S. 37-52). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • avenir suisse (2015). http://www.avenir-suisse.ch/44649/medienfoerderung-im-politischen-grabenkampf/ (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • avenir suisse (2014). Medienförderung im digitalen Zeitalter – Reformagenda für einen technologie- und wettbewerbsneutralen Service public, Diskussionspapier, http://www.avenir-suisse.ch/40297/medienfoerderung-im-digitalen-zeitalter/ (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Barnett, S. (2009). Journalism, Democracy and the Public Interest. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverband Deutscher Zeitungsverleger - BDZV (2004). Engagement für Pressevielfalt. http://www.bdzv.de/ueber-den-bdzv/aufgaben-und-ziele/50-jahre-bdzv/engagement-fuer-pressevielfalt/ (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Becker, G.S. (1983). A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brümmerhoff, D. (2011). Finanzwissenschaft (10. Aufl.). München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M., Tollison, R.D., & Tullock, G. (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Finanzen (2014). 24. Subventionsbericht der Bundesregierung. www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/publikationen (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Castendyk, O. (2008). Die deutsche Filmförderung – Eine Evaluation. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory Capture. A Review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehling, J., & Schubert, K. (2011). Ökonomische Theorien der Politik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollery, B., & Worthington, A. (1996). The Evaluation of Public Policy: Normative Economic Theories of Government Failure. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 7(1), 27-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEK - Eidgenössische Medienkommission (2014). Medienförderung: Standortbestimmung und Empfehlungen für die Zukunft. www.bakom.admin.ch (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Erlei, M., Leschke, M., & Sauerland, D. (2007). Neue Institutionenökonomik (2. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interface / evalure (2015). Evaluation der „Filmförderungskonzepte des Bundes“ (2008-2011 und 2012-2015). Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Kultur, Sektion Film, 2010 und 2015 (v. A.-C. de Perrot, M. Thévenaz, & D. Wiener). Zürich/Basel. www.bak.admin.ch/ Luzern/Zürich (aufgerufen am 6.6.2015).

  • fögForschungsinstitut Öffentlichkeit und Gesellschaft / Universität Zürich (2014). Qualität der Medien – Jahrbuch 2014. Universität Zürich, Basel: Verlag Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, S., & Sonin, K. (2014). Government Control of the Media. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 163-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersdorf, H. (1991). Staatsfreiheit des Rundfunks in der dualen Rundfunkordnung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott, T.J., & Niegel, C. (2002). Mobile business start-ups in Germany: An exploration of the start-up scene and of corporate venture capital firms’ views on business success drivers and inhibitors. International Journal on Media Management, 4(4), 235-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, M., & Trappel, J. (2008). Glücksritter, apokalyptische Plage oder kühle Rechner. Was von Finanzinvestoren im Medienbereich zu erwarten ist. Media Perspektiven, 10, 532-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, H., Kneidinger, B. & Steininger, C. (2013). Evaluierung der Presseförderung in Österreich. Status, Bewertung, internationaler Vergleich und Innovationspotenziale. Studie im Auftrag des Bundeskanzleramts Österreichs. Wien, www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=50443 (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Hantke-Domas, M. (2003). The Public Interest Theory of Regulation: Non-Existence or Misinterpretation? European Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), 165-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollstein, M. (1978). Government and the Press: The Question of Subsidies. Journal of Communication, 28(4), 46-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holoubek, M. (2010). Medienförderung. In: M. Holoubek, K. Kassai, & M. Traimer (Hrsg.), Grundzüge des Rechts der Massenmedien (S. 119-124). Wien/New York: Springer Notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (2012). Überleben mit staatlicher Unterstützung? Modelle der Presseförderung am Beispiel von Schweden, Frankreich und Österreich. In: N. Springer, J. Raabe, H. Haas, & W. Eichhorn (Hrsg.), Medien und Journalismus im 21. Jahrhundert. Herausforderungen für Kommunikationswissenschaft, Journalistenausbildung und Medienpraxis. (S. 187-200). Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (1994). Presseförderung im westeuropäischen Vergleich. In: P. A. Bruck (Ed.), Medienmanager Staat. Von den Versuchen des Staates, Medienvielfalt zu ermöglichen. Medienpolitik im internationalen Vergleich (S. 443-567). München: Reinhard Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (2006). Press subsidies in the context of the Information Society. Historical modalities, concept and justification. In: I. Fernandez Alonso, M. de Moragas, J. J. Blasco Gil, & N. Almiron (Eds.), Press Subsidies in Europe: Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Press Subsidies in Europe: Development, Pluralism and Transparency’, Barcelona, 19 and 20 June, 2006 (pp. 38-55). Maison d‘edition: Generalitat de Catalunya.

    Google Scholar 

  • IHS - Institut für Höhere Studien (2014). Ökonomische Bedeutung von Zeitungen und Zeitschriften für Österreich, internationaler Vergleich der Presseförderung und Einflüsse des Online-Anzeigenmarkts, v. A. Schnabl, H. Hochmuth, S. Kuschej, Lappöhn, A. Pohl, & B. Wögerbauer. Wien. www.ihs.ac.at (aufgerufen am 18.3.2015).

  • Jarren, O. (2014). Erfüllen die Medien heute einen demokratischen Auftrag? Wie sich der Medienwandel auf Gesellschaft und Politik auswirkt. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 24(3), 317-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, M. (2015). Ausgepresst. http://www.extradienst.at/das-heft/storys/28593, (aufgerufen am 1.3.2015).

  • Kiefer, M.L. (2011). Die schwierige Finanzierung des Journalismus. Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59(1), 5-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M.L. (2005). Medienökonomik. Einführung in eine ökonomische Theorie der Medien. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinewefers, H. (2008). Einführung in die Wohlfahrtsökonomie. Theorie – Anwendung – Kritik., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsteuber, H.J., & Nehls, S. (2011). Media Governance in Europa. Regulierung - Partizipation – Mitbestimmung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, M. (2005). Medienkonzentration als Macht- und Legitimationsproblem für Politik und Wissenschaft. Kritisch-empirische Konzentrationstheorie versus apologetisch-normative Wettbewerbstheorie. In: P. Ahrweiler, & B. Thomaß (Hrsg.), Internationale partizipatorische Kommunikationspolitik. Struktur und Visionen. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans J. Kleinsteuber (S. 117-140). Münster et al.: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramp, L., & Weichert, S. (2012). Innovationsreport Journalismus: Ökonomische, medienpolitische und handwerkliche Faktoren im Wandel (unter Mitarbeit von Roman Przibylla und Simone Jung). Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krone, J. (2013). Aspekte und Perspektiven österreichischer Medienpolitik. Medienförderung des Bundes im Medienwandel. In: M.J. Eumann, F. Gerlach, T. Rößner, & M. Stadelmaier (Hrsg.), Medien, Netz und Öffentlichkeit. Impulse für die digitale Gesellschaft (S. 409-415). Essen: Klartext Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumb, F. (2014). Filmförderung und Subventionskontrolle in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künzler, M. (2013). Mediensystem Schweiz. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089-1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (2015). Medienwandel durch Innovation, Ko-Evolution und Komplexität. Ein Aufriss. In: S. Kinnebrock, C. Schwarzenegger, & T. Birkner (Hrsg.), Theorien des Medienwandels (S. 91-118). Köln: Herbert von Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M., Just, N., Saurwein, F., & Slominski, P. (2002). Selbst- und Ko-Regulierung im Mediamatiksektor. Alternative Regulierungsformen zwischen Staat und Markt, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leif, T, & Speth, R. (2006). Die fünfte Gewalt. Lobbyismus in Deutschland, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienthal, V., Weichert, S., Reineck, D., Sehl, A., & Worm, S. (2014). Digitaler Journalismus Dynamik – Teilhabe – Technik. Herausgegeben von der Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen. Leipzig: Vistas Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löffler, M. (1981). Presseförderung und Pressefreiheit in Europa. Eine vergleichende Übersicht. In: M. Löffler (Hrsg.), Der Staat als Mäzen der Medien? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen staatlicher Hilfsmaßnahmen für die Medien (S. 51-65). München: Beck Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, F. C. (2008). Pressefreiheit und Meinungsvielfalt. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2009). Über Governance: Institutionen und Prozesse politischer Regelung. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1998). State Support for the Press: A Critical Appraisal – Austria, France, Norway and Sweden Compared. European Journal of Communication, 1(3), 291-313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C., & Karmasin, M. (2014). Austria. Press Subsidies in Search of a New Design. In: P. C. Murschetz (Ed.), State Aid for Newspapers. Theories, Cases, Actions (pp. 133-149). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C., & Trappel, J. (2014). State Aid for Newspapers. A Summary Assessment. In: P. C. Murschetz (Ed.), State Aid for Newspapers. Theories, Cases, Actions (pp. 375-393). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. K., & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public Support for the Media: A Six-Country Overview of Direct and Indirect Subsidies, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/Working_Papers/Public_support_for_Media.pdf (aufgerufen am 17.5.2015).

  • Olson, M. (2004). Die Logik des kollektiven Handelns: Kollektivgüter und die Theorie der Gruppen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österreichisches Filminstitut (2015). Filminstitut. Aufgaben und Ziele. http://www.filminstitut.at/de/aufgaben-und-ziele/ (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Österreichisches Filminstitut (2014). facts + figures. Filmwirtschaftsbericht Österreich 2014. Wien: Österreichisches Filminstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österreichischer Rechnungshof (2011). Filmförderung in Österreich. III-208 der Beilagen XXIV. GP – Bericht. http://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/berichte/ansicht/detail/filmfoerderung-in-oesterreich.html. (aufgerufen am 4.5.2015).

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2014). State Support for News: Why Subsidies? Why now? What kinds? In: P. C. Murschetz (Ed.), State Aid for Newspapers. Theories, Cases, Actions (pp. 49-57). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. E., Puppis, M., & Verhulst, S. G. (2013). Media Policy and Governance. Oxford Bibliographies Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0119.

  • Puppis, M., Studer, S., Schweizer, C., & Künzler, M. (2014). Mit Subventionen zu neuen Ufern – Presse- und Medienförderung in Europa. Die Medienwoche. http://medienwoche.ch/2014/04/22/mit-subventionen-zu-neuen-ufern/ (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Puppis, M. (2012). Öffentliche Finanzierung als Antwort auf die Medienkrise? In: W. A. Meier, H. Bonfadelli, & J. Trappel (Hrsg.), Gehen in den Leuchttürmen die Lichter aus? Was aus den Schweizer Leitmedien wird, Vol. 8 (S. 297-312). Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppis, M. (2010). Einführung in die Medienpolitik (2. Aufl.). Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTR – Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (2011). Fonds zur Förderung des nichtkommerziellen Rundfunks (NKRF). Richtlinien. http://www.rtr.at/ de/foe/RichtlinienNKRF_Fonds/NKRF_Richtlinien.pdf (aufgerufen am 12.3.2015).

  • Schulz, W., Kaserer, C., & Trappel, J. (2008). Finanzinvestoren im Medienbereich. Gutachten im Auftrag der Direktorenkonferenz der Landesmedienanstalten. Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjurts, I. (2011). Außenpluralismus. In: I. Sjurts (Hrsg.), Gabler Lexikon Medienwirtschaft (S. 44). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1977). Subsidies and the Press in Europe. Political and Economic Planning, 43(569), London: PEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staatsvertrag für Rundfunk und Telemedien (Rundfunkstaatsvertrag RStV) vom 31.08.1991, in der Fassung des fünfzehnten Staatsvertrages zur Änderung rundfunkrechtlicher Staatsverträge vom 15./21. Dezember 2010. http://www.die-medienanstalten.de/fileadmin/Download/Rechtsgrundlagen/Gesetze_aktuell/15_RStV_01-01-2013.pdf (aufgerufen am 11.9.2015).

  • Trappel, J. (2015). Media Subsidies: Editorial Independence Compromised? In: S. Barnett, & J. Townend (Eds.), Media Power and Plurality. From Hyperlocal to High-Level Policy. Basingstoke (pp. 187-200). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(June), 224-232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, P., Picard, R. G., Sükösd, M., Klimkiewicz, B., Petkovic, B., Dal Zotto, C., & Kerremans, R. (2010). The European Media Pluralism Monitor: Bridging Law, Economic and Media Studies as a First Step Towards Risk-Based Regulation in Media Markets. The Journal of Media Law, 2, 85-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, R. (o.J.). Staatliche Maßnahmen zur Erhaltung der presserechtlichen Meinungsvielfalt. http://wendt.jura.uni-saarland.de/Prof.Dr.Wendt/Aufsaetze/StaatlicheMassnahmenzurErhaltungderpresserechtlichenMeinungsvielfal.htm (aufgerufen am 11.9.2015).

  • Ahrend, R. (2002). Press Freedom, Human Capital and Corruption (February 2002). DELTA Working Paper, No. 2002-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.620102. Accessed on January 3, 2013.

  • Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for Lemons. Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W., Bell, E., & Shirky, C. (2012). Post-Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School. http://towcenter.org/research/post-industrial-journalism/. Accessed on December 2, 2012.

  • Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge. M. (Eds.) (2010). The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72, 351-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1961). What Can Economic Theory Contribute to Managerial Economics. American Economic Review, 51(2), 142-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., & Willig, R. (1981). Fixed costs, sunk costs, entry barriers and sustainability of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96, 405-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, J. L. F. (1883). Théorie Mathématique de la Richesse Sociale, Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. Journal de Savants, 67, 499-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. D., & Romano, R. E. (1993). Pricing Decisions of the Newspaper Monopolist. Southern Economic Journal, 54, 721-732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., & Tullock, G. (Eds.) (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, F. (2005). A Guide to Game Theory. Hallow, England: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1962/1933). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (8th ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2012). State Aid Scoreboard Update. Report on State aid granted by the EU Member States, Brussels: COM (2012)778 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R., Hillman, A. L., & Konrad, K. (Eds.) (2008). 40 years of rent-seeking research. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1974). The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas. American Economic Review, 64, 384-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (1988). The Theory of Market Failure. A Critical Examination. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., & Crampton, E. (2002). Market Failure or Success. The New Debate, Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., & Westphal, D. (2010). Public Policy and Funding the News. Research Series: January 2010. Center on Communication and Journalism USC Annenberg, MA. http://fundingthenews.usc.edu/docs/Funding%20the%20News_report-optimized.pdf. Accessed on December 10, 2011.

  • Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory Capture. A Review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daughety, A. F., & Reinganum, J. R. (2008). Imperfect competition and quality signaling. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(1), 163-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M., & Wildman, S. (1992). Reconciling Economic and Non-Economic Perspectives on Media Policy: Transcending the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’. Journal of Communications, 42(1), 5-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuldenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J. J., Laussel, D., & Sonnac, N. (2005). Press Industry and the Political Differentiation of Newspapers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4(3), 317-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, S., & Sonin, K. (2011). Government Control of the Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1315882. Accessed on April 3, 2013.

  • Gustafsson, K. E. (1993). Government policies to reduce newspaper entry barriers. The Journal of Media Economics, 6(1), 37-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantke-Domas, M. (2003). The Public Interest Theory of Regulation: Non-Existence or Misinterpretation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 165-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S., & Finn, A. (2004). Media Economics: Applying Economics to New and Traditional Media, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. (2003). Measuring the financial health of media firms: The bigger, the better? The International Journal of Media Management, 5(4), 237-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, J., & Quinn, S. (2010). Funding journalism in the digital age: Business models, strategies, issues and trends. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, J. (1984). Marktzutritt als Systemelement des Wettbewerbs. In G. G. Kopper, Gerd G. (Ed.). Marktzutritt bei Tageszeitungen - zur Sicherung von Meinungsvielfalt durch Wettbewerb (pp. 75-86). München: Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. E., & Maskin, E., & Roland, G. (2003). Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1095-1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. E. (1986). The Soft Budget Constraint. Kyklos, 39(1), 3-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S. (1992). The financial commitment approach to news media competition. Journal of Media Economics, 5(2), 3-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S. (1993). Understanding & serving readers: The problems of fuzzy market structure. Newspaper Research Journal, 14(2), 55-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S. (2004). Fuzzy Market Structure and Differentiation: one size does not fit all. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), Strategic Responses to Media Market Changes, Jonköping (83-95). Sweden: Media Management and Transformation Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J (1991). The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089-1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2005). Transparency and Corruption. The Conditional Significance of a Free Press. QOG Working Paper Series: 5, Göteborg University. http://www.qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350633_2005_5-lindstedt_naurin.pdf. Accessed on April 3, 2013.

  • Ludwig, J. (2000). The Essential Economic Problem of the Media: Working Between Market Failure and Cross-Financing. Journal of Media Economics, 13(3), 187-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. (2008). The Political Economy of the Media. Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. An introduction, 3rd. ed., London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (2008). Theory of Market Failure. In C. Scholz, & U. Eisenbeis (Eds.), Looking to the Future of Modern Media Management. Changes – Challenges – Opportunities (pp. 59-65), IMMAA Report 2007/2008, MediaXXI: Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A., & Peacock, A. T. (1958). Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (2008). Merit goods. In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.), London: Palgrave Macmillan (April 9, 2013). http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_M000152, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230226203.1089. Accessed on 3 January 2013.

  • Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39, 575-592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. (2000). The capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 81-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. K., & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public Support for the Media: A Six-Country Overview of Direct and Indirect Subsidies, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD – Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2010). Roundtable on Competition, State Aids and Subsidies. DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5. http://www.oecd.org. Accessed on March 10, 2011.

  • Office of Fair Trading – OFT (2006). UK guidance on how to assess the competition effects of subsidies. A report by the Office of Fair Trading, prepared by Nera Economic Consulting, London (OFT 829 by Nera Economic Consulting).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Fair Trading – OFT (2004). Public Subsidies. A report by the Office of Fair Trading, prepared by Frontier Economics, OFT London (OFT750).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanich, G. W. (2006). Media Finance and Evaluation. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics (pp. 601-621). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1971 [1927]). Manual of Political Economy. 1971 translation of 1927 edition, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1973). The Effect of Government Subsidies-in-Kind on Private Expenditures: The Case of Higher Education. Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 1-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, G., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2011). The Economics and Financing of Media Companies, 2nd ed., New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2008). Subsidies for the Media. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 4891-4894). Oxford, UK, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2004). Commercialism and Newspaper Quality. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(1), 54-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (1998). Economics of the Daily Newspaper Industry. In A. Alexander, J. Owers, & R. Carveth (Eds.), Media Economics: Theory and Practice (pp. 111-129). 2nd ed., Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (1993). Economics of the Daily Newspaper Industry. In A. Alexander, J. Owen, J., & R. Carveth (Eds.), Media Economic (pp. 181-203). Theory and Practice, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (1991). Competitive Effects of State Press Policies: An Analytical Framework for Policy Proposals, paper presented to the ‘political economy vs. media economics’ workshop of the economy and future of print media research program, University of Salzburg, October 4-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1932[1920]). The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 335-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prat, A., & Strömberg, D. (2011). The Political Economy of Mass Media, Mimeo, London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E. (2007). Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (4th ed.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. H. (1951). Competition in the Newspaper Industry. Journal of Marketing, 15, 444-456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. H. (1952). Economic forces as factor in daily newspaper competition. Journalism Quarterly, 29, 31-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddaway, W. B. (1963). The economics of newspapers. The Economic Journal, 73, 201-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, M. W. (1982). Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(1), 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, R. J. (2006). Issues in Financial Management. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics (pp. 145-161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1933). The Economics of Imperfect Competition London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, T. W. (1988). On the relative efficiency of cash transfers and subsidies, Working Paper in Economics E-88-20, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roson, R. (2005). Two-Sided Markets: A Tentative Survey. Review of Network Economics, 4(2), 142-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosse, J. N. (1967). Daily Newspapers, Monopolistic Competition, and Economies of Scale. American Economic Review, 57, 522-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, P., & von Hagen, J. (2007). The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets. Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenblik, R. P. (1990). A Subsidy Primer. http://www.globalsubsidies.org/subsidy-primer/ASubsidyPrimer.php. Accessed September 8, 2012.

  • Steenblik, R. P. (2003). Subsidy measurement and classification: developing a common framework. In: OECD (Ed.), Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Policy Issues and Challenges (pp. 101-141). Paris: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1968). Barrier to Entry, Economies of Scale, and Firm Size. In G. J. Stigler (Ed.), The Organization of Industry (pp. 67-70). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1988). Chicago Studies in Political Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). On the Economic Role of the State. In A. Heertje (Ed.), The Economic Role of the State (pp. 9-85). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömberg, D. (2004). Mass Media Competition, Political Competition, and Public Policy. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 265-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truffy, V. (2011). Aides à la presse: 1 milliard d’euros pour la presse papier, 20 millions pour Internet. http://www.mediapart.fr/journal/economie/110110/aides-la-presse-1-milliard-deuros-pour-la-presse-papier-20-millions-pour-int. Accessed on December 12, 2012.

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(June), 224-232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987). Rent seeking. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. (147-149), Volume 4, Palgrave London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 31-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, A. R. (2003). Internal Market Failure: A Framework for Diagnosing Firm Inefficiency. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 431-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. (1990). Diversity and quality of information products in a monopolistically competitive industry. Information Economics and Policy, 4, 291-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C. C. von (1980). Barriers to Entry. A Theoretical Treatment. Springer-Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction cost economics. The governance of contractual relations. Journal of law and Economics, 22, 233-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, R. O. Jr., & McCurdy, H. E. (1999). The Failure of Market Failure. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 558-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. (1999). Market competition and news quality. Paper prepared for presentation at the 1999 annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/zaller/News%20quality%20paper.PDF. Accessed on November 5, 2012.

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, W. (1995) ‘Power Plays. A Comparison Between Swedish and American Press Policies’, dissertation, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Göteborg University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, P. A. (1997) ‘Die Abrechnung des Marktes’, Der Standard 28 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, H. and P. Chapman (1996) The Future of the European Media Industry. Towards the 21st Century. London: Financial Times, Telecoms and Media Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, U. and M. Anselm (1995) Media Sverige 1995, Statistik och Analys. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. and C. Murroni (1996) New Media, New Policies. Media and Communication Strategies for the Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPBF (Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom) (1996) 21st Century Media. Shaping the Democratic Vision, Media Manifesto, pp. 1-12. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, James (1995) ‘Regulation and Deregulation of the British Media’, pp. 35-63 in K. E. Gustafsson (ed.) Media Structure and the State. Concepts Issues, Measures, proceedings from an International symposium, 9-10 May 1994, Göteborg University. Göteborg Mass Media Research Unit, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIEJ (International Federation of Newspaper Publishers) (1995) World Press Trends 1995. Paris: FIEJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geretschlager, E. and A. Leinschitz (1994) ‘Rationelle Distribution’, pp. 507-84 in P.A. Bruck (ed.) Print unter Druck, Zeitungsverlage auf Innovations kurs. Munich: Verlag Reinhard Fischer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewerkschaft Kunst, Medien und freie Berufe — KMfB (1995) ‘Medienpolitische Konzeption der Sektion Journalisten’, Positionspapier, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisold, A. (1996) ‘Press Concentration and Media Policy in Small Countries’, European Journal of Communication, 11(4): 485-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, K. E. (1991) ‘Government Policies to Reduce Newspaper Industry Entry Barriers’, summary of a presentation made at the Workshop III of the research programme ‘Ökonomie und Zukunft der Printmedien’, Salzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (1994) ‘Presseförderung im westeuopäischen Vergleich’, pp. 443-567 in P.A. Bruck (ed.) Medienmanager Staat. Von den Versuchen des Staates, Medienvielfalt zu ermöglichen. Medienpolitik im internationalen Vergleich, Munich: Verlag Reinhard Fischer

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, A. (1996) ‘French Child of the Sixties Faces up to the Modern World: Liberation has Accepted a Rescue Package which Costs it its Independence’, The Financial Times 3 February

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. (1996-7) Rapport Générale fait au nom de la Commission des Finances, du contrôle budgétaires et des comptes économiques de la Nation (1) sur le projet de loi de finances pour 1997, Session Ordinaire de 1996-7, Sénat, No. 86, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (1995) Tree Press and Government: The Ignored Economie Relationships of US Newspapers, pp. 139-55 in K.E. Gustafsson (ed.) Media Structure and the State. Concepts, Issues, Measures. Proceedings from an international symposium, 9-10 May 1994, Goteborg University. Goteborg: Mass Media Research Unit, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Goteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presstödsnämnden, Dagspressens Ekonomi (1994) ed. by Hakan Westergren and Karl Erik Gustafsson. Stockholm: Press Support Board

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on the Press (1974-7) Final Report (RCP 1977), Cmnd 6810. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santini, A. (1990) L’État et la presse. Paris: Litec

    Google Scholar 

  • SJTI (Service Juridique et Technique de l’Information et de la Communication) (1995) Chiffres-clés 1982-1995. Paris: SJTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogerbo, E. (1997) The Press Subsidy System in Norway. European Journal of Communication, 12(1): 99-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (1991) Born Losers or Flexible Adjustment? The Media Policy Dilemma of Small States. European Journal of Communication, 6(3): 355-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, P. A. (1994). Medienmanager Staat. Von den Versuchen des Staates, Medienvielfalt zu ermöglichen. Medienpolitik im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 443–567). München: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, K. (1972). Politics in Austria. A country study, Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabris, H. H. (1976). Helfen den Massenmedien neue Gesetze? Staatliche Kommunikationspolitik am Beispiel der österreichischen Mediengesetzgebung. Publizistik, 21, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, H. (2008). Österreichs Medienwelten von A bis Z. Wien: Falter Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (1994). Presseförderung im westeuropäischen Vergleich. In P. A. Bruck, (Ed.). Medienmanager Staat. Von den Versuchen des Staates, Medienvielfalt zu ermöglichen. Medienpolitik im internationalen Vergleich; Forschungsprogramm ‘Ökonomie und Zukunft der Printmedien’ (pp. 443–567). München, Verlag Reinhard Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • KommAustria (2006). Evaluierung der im Presseförderungsgesetz 2004 festgelegten Fördermaßnahmen im Jahr 2006. https://www.rtr.at/de/ppf/Evaluierung/Pressef%C3%B6rderung%20-%20Evaluierungsbericht%202006.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Media-Analyse (2011). MA 2011 Tageszeitungen Total. http://www.media-analyse.at/studienPublicPresseTageszeitungTotal.do?year=2011&title=Tageszeitungen&subtitle=Total. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1997). State Support to the Press – Theory and Practice. A Survey of Austria, France, Norway, and Sweden, European Institute for the Media. Mediafact Series, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1997). State Support to the Press – Theory and Practice. A Survey of Austria, France, Norway, and Sweden, European Institute for the Media. Mediafact Series, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1998). State Support for the Press: A Critical Appraisal – Austria, France, Norway and Sweden Compared. European Journal of Communication, 13(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (2009). Examining Financial Subsidies to Daily Newspapers in Europe – Do They Avoid Market Failure? In B. Stark, & M. Magin (Eds.), Die österreichische Medienlandschaft im Umbruch. Communication Research in Comparative Perspective (pp. 216–243). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österreichische Auflagenkontrolle – ÖAK (2011). Auflagenliste Jahresschnitt 2011. http://www.oeak.at/content/intern/Auflagenlisten/OEAK_2011_JS_KORR.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Prognos AG (1998). Weißbuch zur Presseförderung in Österreich, Bericht erarbeitet im Auftrag des Bundeskanzleramtes Wien, Basel. http://www.prognos.com. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Rechnungshof (1992). Bericht des Rechnungshofs über Wahrnehmungen betreffend die Gebarung des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales hinsichtlich arbeitsmarktpolitischer Maßnahmen gemäß § 39a des Arbeitsmarktförderungsgesetzes in den Jahren 1983 bis 1988. http://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XVIII/I/I_00797/imfname_261964.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013

  • Republik Österreich (1975a). Bundesgesetz vom 2. Juli 1975 über die Förderung der Presse, Wien. http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1975_404_0/1975_404_0.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Republik Österreich (1975b). Bundesgesetz vom 2. Juli 1975 über die Aufgaben, Finanzierung, und Wahlwerbung politischer Parteien, Wien. http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1975_404_0/1975_404_0.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Republik Österreich (1985). Presseförderungsgesetz 1985, Wien. http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1985_228_0/1985_228_0.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Republik Österreich (1992). Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Presseförderung 1985 geändert wird, 31/7/1992. https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1992_866_0/1992_866_0.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Schmolke, M., & Feldinger, N. (1995). Parteien und Parteipresse [Political parties and the party press]. Die Tageszeitungen der politischen Parteien in Österreich nach 1945, Abschlußbereicht, Salzburg: Universität Salzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österreichische Auflagenkontrolle – ÖAK (2011). Auflagenliste Jahresschnitt 2011. http://www.oeak.at/content/intern/Auflagenlisten/OEAK_2011_JS_KORR.pdf. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Seethaler, J., & Melischek, G. (2006). Die Pressekonzentration in Österreich im europäischen Vergleich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 4, 337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2010). Squeezed and Uneasy: PSM in Small States – Limited Media Governance Options in Austria and Switzerland. In P. Iosifidis (Ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond (pp. 209–221). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2005). Medienförderung: Ein Komplementärinstrument der schweizerischen Medienpolitik? Konzepte zur Vielfaltsicherung und Erfahrungen aus Österreich. In M. Künzler (Ed.), Das schweizerische Mediensystem im Wandel. Herausforderungen, Chancen, Zukunftsperspektiven (pp. 77–97). Bern u. a.: Haupt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (1991a). Medien, Macht, Markt: Medienpolitik westeuropäischer Kleinstaaten, Wien: Österreichischer Kunst- und Kulturverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (1991b). Born Losers or Flexible Adjustment? The Media Policy Dilemma of Small States. European Journal of Communication, 6, 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmaurer, T. (2002). Konzentriert und Verflochten. Österreichs Mediensystem im Überblick, Innsbruck: Studienverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmaurer, T. (2009). Das Mediensystem Österreichs. In Hans-Bredow-Institut (Ed.), Internationales Handbuch Medien (pp. 504–517). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2007). The Austrian Media Landscape. In G. Terzis (Ed.), European Media Governance. National and Regional Dimensions (pp. 63–72). Bristol: intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2010). Media Landscape: Austria. http://www.ejc.net/media_landscape/article/austria/. Accessed on February 3, 2013.

  • Trappel, J., & Zettl, V. (2013). Öffentliche Werbung: Politische Sterntaler. DerStandard.at, 5.2.2013. http://derstandard.at/1358305492833/Oeffentliche-Werbung-Politische-Sterntaler. Accessed on February 12, 2013.

  • Universität Wien (2013). Evaluierung der Presseförderung in Österreich. Status, Bewertung, internationaler Vergleich und Innovationspotenziale. Eine Studie im Auftrage des Bundeskanzleramts Österreichs, Wien. www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=50443. Accessed on February 26, 2013.

  • VÖZ – Verband Österreichischer Zeitungen (2012). Pressestatistik Tageszeitungen, July 2012. http://www.voez.at/b200m30. Accessed on February 5, 2013.

  • VÖZ – Verband Österreichischer Zeitungen (1995). Luxussteuer auf Werbung – Dokumentation zur Anzeigen- und Ankündigungsabgabe, St. Pölten: Express Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowicz, M. 2004. Copyrighted works as public goods, 1(2), May 6. ipcentral.info/review/v1n2abramowicz.pdf, accessed on 28 March 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarran, A. B. 1996. Media Economics: Understanding Markets, Industries and Concepts, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F. M. 1958. The Anatomy of Market Failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72: 351-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. 1998. Public Service Broadcasting: An Agenda for Reform. Intermedia, 26(3): 24-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. 1986. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. XII, Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. 1988. The Theory of Market Failure. A Critical Examination. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., & Crampton, E. (2002). Market Failure or Success. The New Debate, Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detering, D. (1999). Ökonomie der Medieninhalte. Allokative Effizienz und soziale Chancengleichheit in den Neuen Medien, Telekommunikation und Multimedia, Münster: LitVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding Media Economics, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaustad, T. (2002). The Problem of Excludability for Media and Entertainment Products in New Electronic Market Channels. Electronic Markets, 12(4): 248-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S., & Finn, A. (2004). Media Economics. Applying Economics to New and Traditional Media, Sage Publications, London: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A., & Peacock, A. T. 1958. Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam, E. 2004. Market failure in the media sector, Financial Times, 16 February 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. M., & Wildman, S. S. 1992. Video Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1971/1927). Manual of Political Economy. 1971 translation of 1927 edition, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. 1989. Media Economics: Concepts and Issues. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, M. W. 1982. Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(1): 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 387-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1955. Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37(4): 350-356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1958. Aspects of Public Expenditure Theories, Review of Economics and Statistics, 40(4): 332-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1964. Public goods and subscription TV: Correction of the record. Journal of Law and Economics, 7: 81-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. 1988. Chicago Studies in Political Economy, ed. By George J. Stigler, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. 1984. Markets, Market Failures, and Development, American Economic Review, 79(2), (pp. 197-203). Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and First Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, S. S. 2006. Paradigms and Analytical Frameworks in Modern Economics and Media Economics. In: Albarran, A. B., Chan-Olmsted, S., & Wirth, O. (eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah: New Jersey, 67-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K. 2001. Internet-Based Distribution of Digital Videos: The Economic Impacts of Digitization on the Motion Picture Industry. Electronic Markets, 11(4): 273-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARD-Projektgruppe Digital (2001). Digitales Fernsehen in Deutschland – Markt, Nutzerprofile, Bewertungen. Media Perspektiven, vol. 4/2001, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 202-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF-G – Bundesgesetz über den Österreichischen Rundfunk (2001). BGBl. Nr. 379/1984 idF. BGBl. I Nr. 83/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1998). Public Service Broadcasting: An Agenda for Reform. InterMedia, vol. 26, no. 3, March, London, pp. 24-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche TV-Plattform (2000). Fernsehen Heute und Morgen. Technik – Märkte – Strategien, www.tv-plattform.de, Berlin.

  • DPA – Digitale Plattform Austria (2002). Willkommen in der Digitalen Zukunft, Publikation Auftaktveranstaltung, RTR-GmbH Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, H. and A. Merkle (1999). Sendepause. Medien und Medienpolitik in Österreich. Edition lex liszt 12, Oberwart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, M. and H. Never (1999). Digitalisierung als Chance? Strukturwandel der Medienwirtschaft im Zeitalter digitaler Kommunikation, eds. M. Knoche and G. Siegert, Verlag Reinhard Fischer, München, pp. 91-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glotz, P., Gröbel, J., and E.-J. Mestmäcker (1998). Zur Wirklichkeit der Grundversorgung. Über den Funktionsauftrag öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunkanstalten. Fernsehen auf dem Prüfstand. Kommunikationsordnung 2000, ed. by I. Hamm, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, pp. 87-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infosat (2000). Staatlich verordnete d-box-Invasion in Österreich?, 10/2000, no. 151, pp. 6-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infosat (2002). Fernsehen ohne Grenzen. Von der Freiheit über den Wolken, 1/2002, no. 166, pp. 8-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • IP Germany (2001). Television 2001, European Key Facts, RTL Group, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M. L. (2001). Medienökonomik. Einführung in eine ökonomische Theorie der Medien. Oldenbourg: München, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassnig, M., Mulrenin, A, and H. Selhofer (1999). Marktentwicklung des digitalen Fernsehens in Deutschland und Österreich, Techno-Z Forschungs- und Entwicklung GmbH, Salzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgen, M. (2001). Studie ‚Digitales Fernsehen in Österreich’, LS telcom, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (1998). Markt- und Politikversagen im Fernsehsektor. Verlag Peter Lang, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1996). Die Geschichte des Rechts der elektronischen Medien in Österreich 1945 – 1995’, Rot-Schwarz-Rot. Rundfunkpolitik in Österreich 1945 – 1995, ed. D. Stepan, Guthmann & Petersen, Wien, pp. 51-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1998). The Austrian Broadcasting Corporation shapes up to the digital age’, in InterMedia, vol. 26, no. 5, December, pp. 33-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF (1999). Digitales Fernsehen für Österreich. Fernsehen auf neuen Übertragungswegen, ORF TD/GÖK, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF (2000). Für einen österreichischen Kulturkanal – Ein Projekt des ORF, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF (2001a). Der ORF im Wettbewerb. Daten, Fakten und Zusammenhänge zur Finanzierung des ORF, März 2001, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF (2001b). Die Zukunft ist interaktiv, Broschüre, Redaktion: Kaufmännische Direktion des ORF, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF (2001c). Ergebnisse 1998 – 2001. Arbeitsbilanz, MitarbeiterInnen, Landesintendanten, Geschäftsführung und Generalintendant Gerhard Weis, November 2001, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORF (2002), Internet: http://mediaresearch.orf.at (8 April 2002).

  • Reiter, U. (1997). Die Strategie der ARD im Digitalen Zeitalter’, Media Perspektiven, vol. 8, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 410-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, U. (1998). ARD-Weißbuch 2000. Chancen, Risiken und Aufgaben des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks in der digitalen Medienwelt. Ein Diskussionsbeitrag, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, W.-D. (2001). Entwicklung eines dualen Fernsehsystems in Österreich, gutachterliche Stellungnahme im Auftrage des Verbands Österreichischer Zeitungen, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schliesselberger, H. (2002). Ein Sender startet durch. Salzburger Nachrichten, 15 February 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, F. (2001). Wotan Syndrom. Der ORF als Identitätsspender und als gestörte Identität. Der Falter, vol. 29, Wien, pp. 13-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selhofer, H. and M. Lassnig (2000). Ich sehe was, was du nicht siehst … Set-Top-Boxen als Gatekeeper digitaler Fernsehdienste: Medienpolitische Herausforderungen und Akzeptanzfragen. Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft. Schriftenreihe zur Informationsgesellschaft, Band 15, Salzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siune, K. and O. Hultén (1998), ‘Does Public Broadcasting Have a Future?’, in Media Policy. Convergence, Concentration & Commerce, ed. by McQuail, D. and K. Siune, London: Sage, pp. 23-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steemers, J. (1998). On the Treshold of the Digital Age: Prospects for Public Service Broadcasting. Changing Channels. The Prospects for Television in a Digital World, University of Luton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmaurer, T. (2000). Das Rundfunksystem Österreichs. Internationales Handbuch für Hörfunk und Fernsehen 2000/1, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. (1998). The Decline and Fall of Public Service Broadcasting, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (1998). Werbemarkt Schweiz. Abschätzung der wirtschaftlichen Tragfähigkeit für das Fernsehen, Prognos, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2001a). Fernsehmarkt Österreich, Prognos, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2001b). Fernsehen in Österreich und in der Schweiz. Wenig Licht im deutschen Marktschatten. Media Perspektiven, vol. 6, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 306-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triconsult (2001). Marktpotenzial Digitales Fernsehen, Repräsentative österreichweite face-to-face Befragung bei 1000 Personen ab 14 Jahren (Feldzeit 2.-21. März 2001), Triconsult GmbH, Wien (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  • VKI – Verein für Konsumenteninformation (2000). ORF über D-box. Konsument, Wien (www.konsument.at).

  • Zeiler, G. (1997). Der öffentliche Auftrag des ORF. Die Position des Unternehmens im Wettbewerb des digitalen Medienzeitalters. ORF-Medienreport, vol. 421, Februar-März, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, G. (1998). Quote und/oder Kulturauftrag, Podiumsveranstaltung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Kulturpolitik und der SPÖ-Zukunftswerkstätte, 4. Mai 1998, Wien (collected by T. Swoboda, Werkstattblätter, 3/98: 8-9).

    Google Scholar 

  • AGf/GfK Fernsehforschung (ed.). TV Daten, Zuschauermarkt, Marktanteil Digital TV, available at: http://www.agf.de/daten/zuschauermarkt/markanteiledigital, retrieved on 16 December 2008.

  • Albarran, A. B. (2002). Media Economics. Understanding Markets, Industries and Concepts (2nd ed.), Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., & Coate, S. (2005). Market provision of broadcasting: a welfare analysis, Review of Economic Studies, 72(4), 947-972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (1999). ‘Competition in the Pay TV Market’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 13, 257-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin, D. J., Neuendorf, K., Jeffries, L. W., Skalski, P. (2003). Predictors of audience interest in adopting digital television, Journal of Media Economics, 16(3), 159-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. J., & Brown, K. (2007). ‘Policymaking and policy trade-offs: broadcast media in the United States”, in: Seabright, P., & von Hagen, J. (eds.) The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets. Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy. Cambridge: University Press, 255-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., & Weeds, H. (2007). ‘Public Service Broadcasting in the digital world’, in: Seabright, P., von Hagen, J. (eds.) The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets. Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy. Cambridge: University Press, 81-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. (1968). Industrial Organization, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72, 351-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1982). American Economic Review, 72(1), 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breunig, C. (2007) IPTV and WebTV im digitalen Fernsehmarkt, Media Perspektiven, Heft 10, 478-491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1965). Economica, 32(125), 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. (2005). Competition and the exercise of market power in broadcasting: a review of the recent UK experience, Info - The journal of policy, regulation and strategy for telecommunications, 7(5), 20-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. (2004). Competition in broadcasting – consequences for viewers, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/psb2/psb2/psbwp/wp1cave.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Cave, M., & Crandall, R. W. (2001). Sports rights and the broadcasting industry, The Economic Journal, 111, F4 – 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorianopoulos, K., & Spinellis, D. (2007). Coping with TiVo: Opportunities of the Networked Digital Video Recorder, Telematics and Informatics, 24(1), 48-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, 386-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (1988). The Theory of Market Failure. A Critical Examination. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (2003). Market Failure and Success. The New Debate, Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (1999). The Future Funding of the BBC, Annex 8, Market Failure in the Broadcasting industry, available under http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/bbc_funding_review/annex8.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Clark, J. M. (1940). Toward a Concept of Workable Competition, American Economic Review, 30, 241-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M. (1961). Competition as a Dynamic Process, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, 386-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1986). The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. XII, Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., & Crampton, E. (2002). Market failure or Success. The New Debate, Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1969). ‘Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint’, Journal of Law and Economics, 12: 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research, Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., & Stiglitz, J. (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity, American Economic Review, 67, 297-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAZ - Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2007). Die Last der hohen Schulden, written by Marcus Theurer, 10.8.2007, Nr. 184, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaustad, T. (2002). The Problem of Excludability for Media and Entertainment Products in New Electronic Market Channels, Electronic Markets, 12(4), 248-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, R. (2003). Aufstieg und Fall der Kirch-Gruppe. Eine institutionenökonomische Erklärung, Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Rundfunkökonomie an der Universität zu Köln, Heft 171, http://www.rundfunk-institut.uni-koeln.de/institut/pdfs/17103.pdf, retrieved on 20 September 2008.

  • Goldmedia Consulting & Research (2007). Zukunft der TV Übertragung, Berlin 2007, http://www.goldmedia.com/aktuelles/info/news/zukunft-der-tv-uebertragung/247.html, retrieved on 8 January 2008.

  • Haddon, L. (2007). The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption, The Information Society, 22, 195-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbord, D., & Ottaviani, M. (2001). ‘Contracts and competition in the Pay TV market’, Economics Discussion Paper 2001/5, London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horizont (2008). Williams Agenda bei Premiere, 18.9.2008, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horizont (2008). Premiere. Banken machen dem Krisensender Druck, 13.11.2008, http://www.horizont.net/aktuell/medien/pages/protected/Premiere-Banken-machen-dem-Krisensender-Druck_80249.html

  • IP Deutschland (2008). Television Keyfacts 2008 Deutschland, http://www.ip-deutschland.de/ipdeutschland/download-data/television_keyfacts_2008_Deutschland.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Jeanrenaud, C., & Késenne, S. (2006). Sports and the Media. An Overview, in: Jeanrenaud, C., & Késenne, S. (eds), The Economics of Sports and the Media. New Horizons in the Economics of Sports, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstens, E. (2006). Fernsehen Digital. Eine Einführung, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • KEK – Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich (2008). Programmliste 2008, http://www.kek-online.de/Inhalte/programmliste_08.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Kiefer, M. L. (2002). Kirch-Involvenz. Ende einer ökonomischen Vision, Media Perspektiven, 10, 491-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J. (2008). Exklusive Sportfernsehrechte und Schutzlisten, in: Gruševaja, M., Wonke, C., Hösel, U., & Dunn, M. H. (eds.) Quo vadis Wirtschaftspolitik? Ausgewählte Aspekte der aktuellen Diskussion. Festschrift für Norbert Eickhof, Peter Lang Verlag, 153-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J. (2005). ‚Zugang zu Premium Content aus ökonomischer Sicht’, in: Weber, Rolf H., Osterwalder, S. (eds.) Zugang zu Premium Content, Zürich (Nomos Schulthess), 7-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasian, J. R. (1964). Television pricing and the theory of public goods, Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 71-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M., & Polo, M. (1997). Concentration and Public Policies in the Broadcasting Industry: The Future of Television, Economic Policy, 25, 294-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. & Polo, M. (2003). Beyond the Spectrum Constraint: Concentration and Entry in the Broadcasting Industry, Working Papers 115, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A., & Peacock, A. T. (1958). Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicita, A., Galbiati, R., & Nizi, G. (2004). Regulation and Competition in Media Markets: the Evolution of Pay TV in the UK, Australia, and Italy, American Law & Economics Assocation Annual Meetings, 76: http://law.bepress.com/alea/14th/art76, retrieved on 20 September 2008.

  • Nolan, D. (1997). Bottlenecks in Pay Television: Impact on Market Development in Europe, Telecommunications Policy Journal, 21(7), 597-610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD – Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (1993). Glossary of Industrial Organization Economics and Competition Law, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/8/61/2376087.pdf, accessed 8 September 2008.

  • Ofcom – Office of Communications (2007a). Pay TV market investigation. Consultation document, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/market_invest_paytv/pay_tv.pdf, retrieved on 8 January 2008.

  • Ofcom – Office of Communications (2007b). Summary profiles of Pay TV in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and United States. Annex 9 to pay TV market investigation, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/market_invest_paytv/annex9.pdf, retrieved on 8 January 2008.

  • Ofcom – Office of Communications (2007c). Summary of UK sports rights. Annex 10 to pay TV market investigation, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/market_invest_paytv/annex_10.pdf, retrieved on 8 January 2008.

  • Ofcom – Office of Communications (2007d). Market definition and market power in pay TV. Annex 13 to pay TV market investigation, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/market_invest_paytv/an13.pdf, retrieved on 8 January 2008.

  • Olson, M. Jr. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. M., Beebe, J. H., & Manning, W. G. (1974). Television Economics. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Co, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. M., & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Video Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1971/1927). Manual of Political Economy. 1971 translation of 1927 edition, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premiere AG (2008a). Bericht zum dritten Quartal, http://info.premiere.de/inhalt/static/download/aktie/2008/q3_2008/deutsch/premiere_ag_q3_2008_bericht_d.pdf, retrieved on 11 November 2008.

  • Premiere AG (2008b). JPMorgan TV Broadcasting CEO Conference 1st & 2nd July 2008, Presenter: Alexander Teschner, CFO, http://info.premiere.de/inhalt/static/download/aktie/praesentationen/premiere_ag_presentation_010708_jpmorgan_conference.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1958). Aspects of Public Expenditure Theories, Review of Economics and Statistics, 40, 332-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1964). Public goods and subscription TV: Correction of the record, Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 81-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T., & Tschirhart, J. T. (1980). The Economic Theory of Clubs, Journal of Economic Literature, 18, 1482-1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S. (1979). Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 141-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Houghton and Mifflin Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, P., & Weeds, H. (2007). Competition and market power in broadcasting: where are the rents? In: Seabright, P., & von Hagen, J. (eds.) The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets. Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy. Cambridge: University Press, 47-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, H. A. (2007). Commentary: Sports Broadcasting: Is it a Job for Public Service Broadcasters? A Welfare Economics Perspective, Journal of Media Economics, 20, 289-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, H. (2001). The market for sports rights. Will the Listed Events solve the problems?, Paper presented at the 15th Nordic Conference on Media and Communication Research Reykjavik, Iceland 10-available at www.nordicom.gu.se/common/publ_pdf/42_331-338.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Spence, M., & Owen, B. M. (1977). Television programming, monopolistic competition, and welfare, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 103-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, J. (2004). ‘Vertical integration in digital television: Explaining why the United States has no Access Directive’, in: IRIS Special: Regulating Access to Digital Television: Technical Bottlenecks, Vertically-Integrated Markets and New Forms of Media Concentration, European Audiovisual Laboratory, 69-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm, P. (2002). The singularities of German’s cable market, Communication & Strategies, 46, 207-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2000). ‘Television and the Public Interest’, California Law Review, 88(2), 499-565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegge, S. (2006). Die Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf den Markt für Fernsehprogramme, Arbeitspapier des Instituts für Rundfunkökonomie an der Universität zu Köln, Heft 220, http://www.rundfunk-institut.uni-koeln.de/institut/pdfs/22006.pdf, retrieved on 8 September 2008.

  • Young, D. P. T. (2000). Modeling Media Markets: How Important is Market Structure?, The Journal of Media Economics, 13(1), 27-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, M. O., & Bloch, H. (1995). Industrial organization theory and media industry analysis, The Journal of Media Economics, 8(2), 15-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, F. H. (2003). Entwicklungen des Pay-TV in Deutschland – Wettbewerbsstrategische Optionen im TV-Markt, in: Brösel, G., Keuper, F. (eds.), Medienmanagement, München: Oldenbourg, 121-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldt, R. (2002). Pay TV: Marktbereinigung auf breiter Front, Media Perspektiven, 11, 534-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research - Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks , London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe Jr., R. O., & McCurdy, H. E. (1999). The Failure of Market Failure, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 558-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accenture (2011). Bringing TV to Life, Issue II. The Race to Dominate the Future of TV. Chicago: Accenture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accenture (2012). Bringing TV to Life, Issue III. TV is all around you. Chicago: Accenture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarran, A. B. (2010). The Media Economy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altimeter (2013). The Converged Media Imperative. How Brands Must Combine. Paid, Owned, and Earned Media. http://de.slideshare.net/Altimeter/the-converged-media-imperative.

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating Value through Business Model Innovation. Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. (1968). Industrial Organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Rogers, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982), Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1980). Industrial organization, corporate strategy and structure. Journal of Economic Literature, 18(1), 64-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2006). Issues in Strategic Management. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics (pp. 161-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Kang, J.-W. (2003). Theorizing the strategic architecture of a broadband television industry. The Journal of Media Economics, 16(1), 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Ha, L. (2003). Internet business models for broadcasters: How television stations perceive and integrate the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(4), 597-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Li, C. C. (2002). Strategic competition in the multichannel video programming market: An intra-industry strategic group analysis. Journal of Media Economics, 15(3), 153-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chon, B. S., Choi, J. H., Barnett, G. A., Danowski J. A., & Joo, S. H. (2003). A structural analysis of media convergence: Cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. Journal of Media Economics, 16(3), 141-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche TV-Plattform (2012). White Book Hybrid-TV/Smart TV. Arbeitsgruppe Smart-TV der Deutschen TV-Plattform, Version 2.0, August 2012. http://www.unternehmen.zdf.de/fileadmin/files/Download_Dokumente/DD_Technik/hybrid-tv_white-book_2012.pdf.

  • Dogruel, L. (2013). Opening the Black Box. The Conceptualizing of Media Innovation. In T. Størsul, & A. H. Krumsvik (Eds.), Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change (pp. 29-45). Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2010). From Television to Multi-Platform: Less from More or More for Less? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16, 431-449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eimeren, B., & Frees, B. (2013). Rasanter Anstieg des Internetkonsums – Onliner fast drei Stunden täglich im Netz. Media Perspektiven, 7-8/2013, 358-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETSI – European Telecommunications Standards Institute (2010). Hybrid Broadcast Broadband Television, ETSI TS 102 796. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102700_102799/102796/01.01.01_60/ts_102796v010101p.pdf.

  • European Commission (2013). Preparing for a Fully Converged Audiovisual World: Growth, Creation and Values. Brussels, 24.4.2013, COM(2013)231 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

  • European Parliament (2013). The Challenges of Connected TV. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2013/513976/IPOL-CULT_NT%282013%29513976_EN.pdf.

  • Fu, W. (2003). Applying the Structure-Conduct-Performance Framework in the Media Industry Analysis. The International Journal of Media Management, 5(IV), 275-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FutureScape (2011). How Connected Television Transforms the Business of TV. A white paper based on the FutureScape strategy report Social TV. www.brandchannel.com/images/papers/530_futurescape_wp_connected_tv_0911.pdf.

  • Hacklin, F., Battistini, B., & Krogh, G. v. (2013). Strategic Choices in Converging Industries, MIT Sloan Management Review. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/strategic-choices-in-converging-industries/.

  • Hacklin, F. (2008). Management of Convergence in Innovation, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T, & Matt, C. (2013). The Internet and the Value Chains of the Media Industry. In S. Diehl and M. Karmasin (eds.), Media and Convergence Management (pp. 37-57). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007). The Cultural Industries (2nd ed.). London and Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDATE (2010). Connected TV. http://blog.idate.fr/connected-tv/.

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2012). The New-wave of De-convergence: a new business model of the communication industry in the 21 Century. Media, Culture and Society, 34(6), 761-772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2013). De-Convergence of Global Media Industries. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, H. J., Nilssen, T., & Sorgard, L. (2009). Business models for media firms: Does competition matter for how they raise revenue? Marketing Science, 28(6), 1112-1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, L. (2013). Innovations, technology, and Organizational Change. Legacy Media’s Big Challenges. An Introduction. In T. Størsul, & A. H. Krumsvik (Eds.), Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change (pp. 9-13). Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (2013). Towards an innovation-co-evolution-complexity perspective on communications policy. In M. Löblich, & S. Pfaff-Rüdiger (Eds.), Communication and Media Policy in the Era of Digitization and the Internet. Theories and Processes (pp. 15-27). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liestøl, G. (2007). The Dynamics of Convergence & Divergence in Digital Domains, In T. Storsul, & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Ambivalence Towards Convergence. Digitalization and Media Change (pp. 165-178). Stockholm: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • die medienanstalten – ALM GbR (2014). Digitisation 2014. Broadcasting and the internet – thesis, antithesis, synthesis? (Digitalisierungsbericht 2014, English version). www.diemedienanstalten.de.

  • Meikle, G., & Young, S. (2012). Media convergence. Networked Digital Media in Everyday Life. Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEM Networked & Electronic Media (2012). Connected TV Position Paper. Retrieved from http://www.nem-initiative.org/fileadmin/documents/PositionPapers/NEM-PP-015.pdf.

  • Noll, M. (2003). The Myth of Convergence. The International Journal on Media Management, 1(5), 12-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD – Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (2013). Competition Issues in Television and Broadcasting. Policy Roundtables, DAF/COMP/GF(2013)13. http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/TV-and-broadcasting2013.pdf.

  • Palmer, J., & Eriksen, L. B. (1999). Digital News-Paper: Broadcast and More Convergence on the Internet. International Journal on Media Management, 1(1), 31-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2011). The Economics and Financing of Media Companies, 2nd ed., New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management, Academy of Management Review, 6, 609-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1979). How Competitive Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57, 137–156 (March-April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramstad, G. O. (1997). A Model for Structural Analysis of the Media Market. Journal of Media Economics, 10(3), 45-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangone, A., & Turconi, A. (2003). The television (r)evolution within the multimedia convergence: a strategic reference framework. Management Decision, 41(1), 48-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimscha, B. v. (2006). How the DVR is changing the TV industry - a supply side perspective. International Journal on Media Management, 8(3), 116-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1988). Industrial Economics: An Overview. Economic Journal, 98(392), 643-681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V. (2012). Governance and Complexity. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 129-142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. (1995). Convergence Is a Dangerous Word. Convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1(1), 11-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Størsul, T., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2013). What is Media Innovation? In T. Størsul, & A. H. Krumsvik (Eds.), Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change (pp. 13-16). Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Størsul, T., & Stuedahl, D. (2007). Ambivalence towards convergence. Digitization and media change. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielmann, B., & Dowling, M. (1999). Convergence and innovation strategy for service provision in emerging web-TV markets. The International Journal on Media Management, 1(1), 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D., Sherman, R., & Ji, S. W. (2012). The Economics of Online Television: Revenue Models, Aggregation, and ‘TV Everywhere’. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2032828.

  • Wirth, M. O. (2006). Issues in Media Convergence. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics (pp. 445-463). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, M. O., & Bloch, H. (1995). Industrial organization theory and media industry analysis. Journal of Media Economics, 8(2), 15-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W. (2001). Reconfiguration of Value Chains in Converging Media and Communications Markets. Long Range Planning, 34, 489-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. P. T. (2000). Modeling media markets: How important is market structure? Journal of Media Economics, 13, 27-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Yannis. “A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces.” MIS Quarterly, v. 15/3, 295-310 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Axel. “Reconciling community and commerce? Collaboration between produsage communities and commercial operators, Information, Communication & Society.” In Oscar Westlund (Ed.), Special issue: Transforming tensions: legacy media towards participation and collaboration, v. 15/6, 815-835 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, Joe and Henry Mintzberg. “Customizing customization.” Sloan Management Review, v. 38/1, 21-30 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, Arnold, et al. Information, Organization and Management. Berlin: Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, Coimbatore and Venkat Ramaswamy. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Richard and Rafael Ramirez. “From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy.” Harvard Business Review, v.71, 65-77 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, Ralf and Frank T. Piller, Interaktive Wertschöpfung: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, Ralf et al. “Customers as part of value webs. Towards a framework for webbed customer innovation tools.” Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Computer Sciences (HICSS), Maui, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Martin. The share economy: Conquering Stagflation, Boston: Harvard Publication Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, Rolf et al. “Web 2.0 and beyond: implications for electronic commerce.” Electronic Commerce ACM, New York, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J. W., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., & Sawyer, A. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61, 48-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. W. (1991). What are Transaction Costs?, Research in Law and Economics, 14, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 493-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anding, M., & Hess, T. (2002). Online Content Syndication - eine transaktionskostentheoretische Analyse, In Gabriel, R., & Hoppe, U. (Eds.), Electronic Business. Theoretische Aspekte und Anwendungen in der betrieblichen Praxis (pp. 163-189). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 233-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely. D. (1998). Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes, and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Economic Review, 53(5), 941-973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, R. M. (1980). Towards an effective characterization of geographical interaction. In R. A. Guedj, P. W. T. ten Hagen, F. R. Hopgood, H. Tucker, & D. A. Duce (Eds.), Methodology of interaction (pp. 127-147), Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, R. M., & Buxton, W. A. S. (1987). Readings in human-computer interaction: a multidisciplinary approach. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 295-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676-1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandulet, M., & Morasch, K. (2005). Would you like to be a Prosumer? Information Revelation, Personalization and Price Discrimination in Electronic Markets. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12, 251-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1948). Organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R., & Wigand, R. (1995). Electronic markets and virtual value chains on the information highway. Sloan Management Review, 62-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C., Moeslein, K., Piller, F. T., & Reichwald, R. (2005). Co-designing modes of cooperation at the customer interface: learning from exploratory research. European Management Review, 2, 70-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R. C., & Deighton, J. (1991). Interactive marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000). Frictionless commerce?, A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46(4), 563-585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P. (2004). Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. Information Society, 20(5), 375-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P. (2004b). The interactivity paradox: Closer to the news but confused. In Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 47-72), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P., & Tao, C. C. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9, 647-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 553-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N. (2000). Testing the Interactivity model, communication processes, partner assessments and the quality of collaborative work. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), 33-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1999). How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 557-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. (1989). Interactive media. In Barnouw, E. (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Communications (pp. 328-330), New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Yen, D. C. (2004). Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information & Management, 42(1), 217-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.-Y., Stahl, D. O., & Winston, A. B. (1997). The economics of electronic commerce. London: Macmillan Technical Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K., Reddi, S. P., & Row, M. C. (1993). The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 9-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1992). Information technology and industrial cooperation: The role of changing transaction costs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(2), 9-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405. Reprinted in Coase, R. H. (1988). The nature of the firm: Influence. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4, 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A., & Simon, K. A. (1997, August). The impact of information technology on transaction and coordination cost. Paper presented at the Conference on Information Systems Research in Scandinavia (IRIS 20), Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., Milley, R., & Marcolin, B. (2001). Understanding IT-enabled interactivity in contemporary marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 18-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30, 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. (1998). Organizing for interactivity. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 47-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, IEEE Computer Soc., Los Alamitos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: the Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media Society, 5(2), 203-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, E. J., & McMillan, S. J. (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimension. New Media & Society, 2(2), 157-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. T. (1987). A typology for interactive media. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 743-757). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(6), 673-699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essler, U., & Whitaker, R. (2001). Re-thinking e-commerce business modelling in terms of interactivity. Electronic Markets, 11(1), 10-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, C. R., & Robey, D. (1986). Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences, 17(4), 329-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfi eld, C. W. (1990). A social infl uence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfi eld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garicano, L., & Kaplan, S. N. (2001). The Effects of Business-to-Business E-Commerce on Transaction Costs. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLIX(4), 463-485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, S., & Dou, W. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(2), 29-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. P., & Lane, D. (2009, November). Interactivity redefined: A first look at outcome interactivity theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago, IL. Retrieved February 24, 2010, from http://people.eku.edu/gleasonj/Outcome_Interactivity_Theory.pdf.

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1989). Toward a theory of public relations behavior of organizations: Review of a program of research. In J. E. Grunig & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public relations research annual (pp. 27-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guedj, R. A., tenHagen, P. J. W., Hopgood, F. R., Tucker, H. A., & Duce, D. A. (1980). Methodology of interaction. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, L., Jankowski, N. W., & Etienne, R. (1996). Interactivity from the Perspective of Communication Studies. In N. W. Jankowski & L. Hanssen (Eds.), Contours of multimedia: Recent technological, theoretical, and empirical developments (pp. 61-73). London: University of Luton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartson, H. R. (1998). Human-computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends. Journal of Systems and Software, 43(2), 103-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of interactivity for communication research. In J. L. Salvaggio & B. Jennings (Eds.), Media use in the information age: Emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use (pp. 53-75), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1). Retrieved 25 March 2005, from http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/heeter/.

  • Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P. (1995). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(7), 50-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D. (1998). Interactive marketing and the meganet: Networks of networks. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 5-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeckel, M. (1995). Interaktion. Soziologische Anmerkungen zu einem Begriff [Interaction. Sociological comments on a concept]. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 463-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jee, J., & Lee, W.-N. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: An exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (1998). Interactivity - tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 185-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56, 110-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & LaRose, R. (2004). Interactive e-commerce: Promoting consumer efficiency or impulsivity? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1). Retrieved July 9, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/kim_larose.html.

  • King, E. (1998). Redefining Relationships: Interactivity between News Producers and Consumers. Convergence, 4(4), 26-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinaltenkamp, M., Fließ, S., & Jacob, F. (1996). Customer Integration — Von der Kundenorientierung zur Kundenintegration. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. D. (2008). Network effects. In Durlauf, S. N., & Blume, L. E. (Eds.), The New Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (pp. 915-917). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, S. (1995). Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 21-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuk, G., & Yeung, F. T. (2002). Interactivity in e-commerce. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(3), 223-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., & Mintzberg, H. (1996). Customizing customization. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 21-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-H., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2000). The complementarity of mass customization and electronic commerce. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), 81-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2004). The impact of perceptions of interactivity on customer trust and transaction intentions in mobile commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3), 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2003). Generating value through online interaction. Individual and situational differences. Competitive Paper Submitted to the 2003 AMS Annual Conference. Retrieved July 9, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol3/issue2/ lombard.html

  • Liu, Y., & Shrum, J. L. (2002). What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved July 9, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol3/issue2/ lombard.html

  • Lowry, P. B., Romano Jr., N. C., Jenkins, J. L., & Guthrie, R. W. (2009). The CMC interactivity model: How interactivity enhances communication quality and process satisfaction in lean-media groups. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 155-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, B. L. (2000). Market-based predictors of interactivity in Southeast Asian online newspapers. Internet Research, 10(3), 227-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (1998). Who pays for content? Funding in interactive media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(1). Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue1/mcmillan.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the Eye of the Beholder: Function, Perception, Involvement, and Attitude toward the Web Site, http://web.utk.edu/~sjmcmill/Research/research.htm.

  • McMillan, S. J. (2000). The Microscope and the Moving Target: The Challenge of Applying Content Analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2002). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber-spaces are more interactive than others. New Media and Society, 4(2), 271-291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2005). The researchers and the concept. Moving beyond a blind examination of interactivity. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 1-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2006). Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems (pp. 205-230). In Lievrouw, L. L., & Livingstone, S. (eds.) Handbook of New Media, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J., & Downes, E. J. (2000). Defining Interactivity: A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimensions. New Media and Society, 2(2), 157-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3), 511-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization, and management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, B. A. (1998). A brief history of human computer interaction technology. ACM interactions, 5(2), 44-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, W. R. (2008). Interactivity, concept of. In Donsbach, W. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online Retrieved October 10, 2010, from http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405131995_yr2010_chunk_g978140513199514_ss44-1.

  • Noll, A. M. (2003). Television over the Internet: technological challenges. In Noam. E. (Ed.), Internet television (pp. 19-30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noori, H. (1990). Economies of integration: a new manufacturing focus. International Journal of Technology Management, 5(5), 577-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy, Harvard Business Review, 71, 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R.T. (2008). Information, Organization and Management. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. (1998). Information, organization, and management: expanding markets and corporate boundaries, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. T. (2001). Die grenzenlose Unternehmung, Gabler: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T. (2002). Customer interaction and digitizability — a structural approach. In Rautenstrauch, C., Seelmann-Eggebert, R., & K. Turowski (ed.), Moving towards mass customization: Information systems and management principles (pp. 119-138). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T. (2008). Interactive value creation with users and customers. In Huff, A. S. (ed.), Leading Open Innovation (pp. 16-24). Munich: Peter-Pribilla-Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., Moeslein, K., & Stotko, C. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Production Planning & Control, 15(4), 435-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., & Moeslein, K. (2002). From economies of scale towards economies of customer integration. Value creation in mass customization based electronic commerce. Unpublished working reports of the Chair of Industrial and Business Economics at the Technical University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 79-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2002). The co-creation connection. Strategy and Business, 27, 50-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Cocreating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiring, O. (2009). What do users associate with ‘interactivity’? A qualitative study on user schemata. New Media & Society, 11(6), 899-920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiring, O., & Schweiger, W. (2008). Interactivity: A review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Communications, 33(2), 147-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From Media to Communication. In Hawkins, R. P., Wieman, J. M., & Pingree, S. (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Communication (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html.

  • Rangaswamy, A., & Pal, N. (2003). Gaining business value from personalization technologies. In N. Pal & A. Rangaswamy (Eds.), The power of one: gaining business value from personalization technologies (pp. 1–9). Victoria, Australia: Trafford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, R., & Piller, F. T. (2000). Mass customization-Konzepte im electronic business. In Weiber, R. (Ed.), Handbuch electronic business. Informationstechnologien — electronic commerce — Geschäftsprozesse (pp. 359-383). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, R., & Piller, F. T. (2009). Interaktive Wertschoepfung: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, R., Seifert, S., & Walcher, D. (2004, January). Customers as part of value webs. Towards a framework for webbed customer innovation tools Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Computer Sciences (HICSS), Maui.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Williams, F. (1984). Theories old and new: The study of new media. In Rice, R. E. (Ed.), The new media (pp. 55-80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D., Riemer, K., & vom Brocke, J. (2010). Social Transactions on Social Network Sites: Can Transaction Cost Theory contribute to a better understanding of Internet Social Networking?. Paper presented at the 23rd Bled eConference, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (1979). User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 527-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, N. C., & Fjermestad, J. (2003). Electronic commerce customer relationship management: A research agenda. Information Technology and Management, 4, 233-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. A. (1974). Effect of medium of communication on experimental negotiation. Human Relations, 27, 225-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugan, S. M. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 75, 99-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, I., & Bucy, E. P. (2008). Interactivity and Political Attitude Formation. A Mediation Model of Online Information Processing. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(2), 29-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanoevska-Slabeva, K. (2011). Enabled Innovation: Instruments and Methods of Internet-based Collaborative Innovation. Draft paper prepared for the first Berlin Symposium in Internet and Society, Berlin, October 25-27, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). From consumer response to active consumer: Measuring the effectiveness of interactive media. Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 376-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1961). The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing interactivity’s effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 355-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave, New York: Bantham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. M., & Piller, F. T. (2003). The Customer Centric Enterprise. Advances in Mass Customization and Personalisation, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M., & Jiao, J. (2001). Mass customisation. In Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial engineering (pp. 684-709). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermerve, S. (2000). How increasing value to customers improves business results. Sloan Management Review, 42, 27-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Yadav, M. S. (2002). Marketing strategy and the internet: An organizing framework. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 296-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users. Management Science, 44(5), 629-644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2002). Open source projects as horizontal innovation networks - by and for users. MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4366-02. Retrieved March 30, 2006, from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/papers/UserInnovNetworksMgtSci.pdf.

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, R. T. (1997). Electronic Commerce: Definition, Theory, and Context. The Information Society, 13, 1-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, R. T., Benjamin, R. I., & Birkland, J. L. H. (2008). Web 2.0 and beyond: implications for electronic commerce. Electronic Commerce ACM, New York, NY, USA, Innsbruck, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikstroem, S. (1996a). Value creation by company-consumer interaction. Journal of Marketing Management, 12, 359-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikstroem, S. (1996b). The customer as co-producer. European Journal of Marketing, 30(4), 6-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F., Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 316-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1976). Franchise bidding for natural monopolies in general and with respect to CATV. Bell Journal of Economics, XXVI(3), 497-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction Cost Economics. The Governance of Contractual Relations. Journal of law and Economics, 22, 233-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organisation: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991b). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanism of Governance, New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2005). Transaction Cost Economics. In Menard, C., & Shirley, M. M. (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 41-65). Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J., & Rangaswamy, A. (2001). Customerization: The Next Revolution in Mass Customization. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 13-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, P. R. (2005a). Interactivity in the electronic marketplace: An exposition of the concept and implications for research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 585-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, P. R. (2005b). Understanding product migration to the electronic marketplace: A conceptual framework. Journal of Retailing, 81(2), 125-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, M., Kumaresh, T. V., & Mercer, G. A. (2001). The false promise of mass customization. McKinsey Quarterly, 38(3), 62-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J. W., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., & Sawyer, A. (1997). Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61, 38-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value Creation in e-Business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 493-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1969). Social Interaction. New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely. D. (1998). Combining Experiences over Time: The Effects of Duration, Intensity Changes, and On-line Measurements on Retrospective Pain Evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers’ Decision Making and Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 233-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, A. & Hagel, J. III (1996). The Real Value of Online Communities. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 1345-1441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, R. M. (1980). Towards an effective characterization of geographical interaction. In Guedj, R. A., ten Hagen, P. W. T., Hopgood, F. R., Tucker, H. A., & Duce, D. A. (Eds.), Methodology of Interaction (pp. 127-147). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, R. M., & Buxton, W. A. S. (1987) Readings in human-computer interaction: a multidisciplinary approach. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 295-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & von Hippel, E. (2009). Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Working Paper, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Sloan School of Management. Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1502864.

  • Ballantine, P. W. (2005). Effects of interactivity and product information on consumer satisfaction in an online retail setting. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(6), 461-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandulet, M., & Morasch, K. (2005). Would you like to be a Prosumer? Information Revelation, Personalization and Price Discrimination in Electronic Markets. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12, 251-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1948). Organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R., & Wigand, R. (1995). Electronic Markets and Virtual Value Chains on the Information Highway. Sloan Management Review, 62-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. R. (1986). Uncertain outcome values in predicted relationships: Uncertainty reduction theory then and now. Human Communication Research, 13, 34-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C., Moeslein, K., Piller, F. T., & Reichwald, R. (2005). Co-designing modes of cooperation at the customer interface: learning from exploratory research. European Management Review, 2, 70-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B. & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R. C., & Deighton, J. (1991). Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2002). The Development and Use of Online Newspapers: What research tells us and what we might want to know. In Lieuvrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.), Handbook of New Media (pp. 270-286). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordewijk, J. L., & van Kaam, B. (1986). Towards a New Classification of TeleInformation Services. Inter Media, 14(1), 16-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, R., & Schmidbauer, M. (1983). Media for Interactive Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, H.-J. (2002). The Power of the Audience: Interculturality, Interactitvity and Trust in Internet Communication. In Sudweeks, F., & Ess, C. (Eds.), Cultural Attitudes towards Computer and Communication (pp. 3-14). Western Australia: Murdoch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, H.-J. (2004). Online-Interaktivität – Ein hybrider Begriff für eine hybride Kommunikationsform. In Bieber, K., & Leggewie, C. (Eds.), Interaktivität. Ein transdisciplinärer Schlüsselbegriff (pp. 132-168). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P. (2004a). Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept. Information Society, 20(5), 375-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P. (2004b). The interactivity paradox: Closer to the news but confused. In Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use. (pp. 47-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P., & Tao, C. C. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9, 647-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 553-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Floyd, K. (2001). Does Participation Affect Deception Success? A Test of The Interactivity Principle. Human Communication Research, 27(4), 503-534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 657-677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1999). How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 557-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. (1989). Interactive Media. In Barnouw, E. (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Communications (pp. 328-330). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey, D. (2010). Right Touching - Using contextual marketing to deliver relevant messages online. Retrieved March 1, 2010, from http://www.davechaffey.com/Internet-Marketing/C6-Customer-Relationship-Management/right-touching-using-contextual-marketing.

  • Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2006). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Yen, D. C. (2004). Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information & Management, 42(1), 217-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2002). A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology and Marketing, 20(4), 323-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C., & Leckenby, J. D. (1999). Interactivity as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness: Antecedents and Consequences of Interactivity in Web Advertising. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 162-179). Pullman, Washington: American Academy of Advertising.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.-Y., Stahl, D. O., & Winston, A. B. (1997). The Economics of Electronic Commerce. London: Macmillan Technical Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405. Reprinted In Kronman, A. T., & Posner, R. A. (Eds.), The Economics of Contract Law (pp. 31-32). Boston: Little Brown, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A., & Simon, K. A. (1997). The Impact of Information Technology on Transaction and Coordination Cost, Conference on Information Systems Research in Scandinavia (IRIS 20), Oslo, Norway, August 9-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., Milley, R., & Marcolin, B. (2001). Understanding IT-Enabled Interactivity in Contemporary Marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 18-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, J. R. & Thorson, E. (2001). The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites. Journal of Advertising, 30, 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. (1998). Organizing for Interactivity. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 47-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • December, J. (1996). What is Computer-mediated Communication? Retrieved March 25, 2005, from http://www.december.com/john/study/cmc/what.html.

  • Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2003). The Web and its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online. New Media Society, 5(2), 203-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, R., Jing, B., & Seidmann, A. (2000). Adoption of Internet-based product customization and pricing strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 9-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, R. R., Zhao, M., Dholakia, N., & Fortin, D. R. (2000). Interactivity and Revisits to Web Sites: A Theoretical Framework, RITIM working paper. Retrieved February 12, 2004, from http://ritim.cba.uri.edu/wp2001/wpdone3/wpdone3.htm.

  • Downes, E. J., & McMillan, S. J. (2000). Defining Interactivity: A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimension. New Media & Society, 2(2), 157-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. (1989). Interaction, face to face. In Barnouw, E. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Communications (pp. 325-330). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. T. (1987). A Typology for Interactive Media. In McLaughlin, M. L. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 743-757). Newbury Park: Erlbaum.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(6), 673-699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essler, U., & Whitaker, R. (2001). Re-thinking E-commerce Business Modelling in terms of Interactivity. Electronic Markets, 11(1), 10-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, A. M., & Jin, H.-J. (2003). Influence of Image Interactivity on Approach Responses towards an Online Retailer. Internet Research, 13(1), 38-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a Web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Piller, F. T. (2004). Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: An exploration of User Interaction and Value Creation. The Case of the Watch Market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(6), 401-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, C. R., & Robey, D. (1986). Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences, 17(4), 329-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In Fulk, J., & Steinfield, C. (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Q., Rau, P.-L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Perception of Interactivity: Affects of Four Key Variables in Mobile Advertising. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 25(6), 479-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaustad, T. (2002). The Problem of Excludability for Media and Entertainment Products in New Electronic Market Channels. Electronic Markets, 12(4), 248-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D. (2000). E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 28(6), 725-737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, S., & Dou, W. (1998). Interactive Functions and Their Impacts on the Appeal of Internet Presence Sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(2), 29-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. P. (2008). The Responsive Multi-Dimensional Model of Interactivity. Proceedings of the 2008 University of Kentucky GSA Symposium, March, 1, 2008. Retrieved March 30, 2008, from http://people.eku.edu/gleasonj/2008%20GSA%20paper%20_RMD%20model_.pdf.

  • Gleason, J. P., & Lane, D. (2009). Interactivity Redefined: A First Look at Outcome Interactivity Theory, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago Hilton & Towers, Chicago, IL, November 11, 2009. Retrieved February 24, 2010, from http://people.eku.edu/gleasonj/Outcome_Interactivity_Theory.pdf.

  • Goertz, L. (1995). Wie interaktiv sind Medien? Auf dem Weg zu einer Definition von Interaktivität. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43, 477-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual, Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1989). Toward a theory of public relations behavior of organizations: Review of a program of research. In Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (Eds.), Public relations research annual (pp. 27-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guedj, R. A., tenHagen, P. J. W., Hopgood, F. R., Tucker, H. A., & Duce, D. A. (1980). Methodology of interaction. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity Reexamined: A Baseline Analysis of Early Business Web Sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, L., Jankowski, N. W., & Etienne, R. (1996). Interactivity from the Perspective of Communication Studies. In Jankowski, N. W., & Hanssen, L. (Eds.), Contours of Multimedia: Recent Technological, Theoretical, and Empirical Developments (pp. 61-73). London: University of Luton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartson, H. R. (1998). Human-computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends. Journal of Systems and Software, 43(2), 103-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of interactivity for communication research. In Salvaggio, J. L., & Jennings, B. (Eds.), Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Consumer Use (pp. 53-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1). Retrieved 25 March 2005, from http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/heeter/.

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J.-S., & McMillan, S. J. (2002). The Role of Interactivity and Involvement in Attitude toward the Web Site, Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising, Jacksonville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiu-Fe, L. (2007). The Impact of Website Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction in the B2C E-Commerce Context. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(4), 363-378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhtamo, E. (1998). From cybernation to interaction: a contribution to an archaeology of interactivity. In Lunenfeld, P. (Ed.), The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on New Media (pp. 96-110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D. (1998). Interactive Marketing and the Meganet: Networks of Networks. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 5-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeckel, M. (1995). Interaktion. Soziologische Anmerkungen zu einem Begriff. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 463-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jee, J., & Lee, W.-N. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: An exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (1998). Interactivity – Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 185-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (2005). Interactive Television: New Genres, New Format, New Content. Proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 123. Sydney, Australia: Creativity & Cognition Studios Press, 89-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z., & Chan, J., & Tan, B. (2010). Effects of Interactivity on Website Involvement and Purchase Intention. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 11(1). Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol11/iss1/1.

  • Johnson, G. J., Bruner, G. C. II, & Kumar, A. (2006). Interactivity and its facets revisited: Theory and Empirical Test. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 35-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in Web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior?. Journal of Communication, 56, 110-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, K., Gorelik, A., & Mwangi, S. (2000). Interactive features of newspapers. First Monday, 5(1), 3 January 2000. Retrieved October 3, 2006, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_1/kenney/index.html.

  • Kim, J., & LaRose, R. (2004). Interactive e-commerce: Promoting Consumer Efficiency or Impulsivity?. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1). Retrieved July 9, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/kim_larose.html.

  • Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A Concept Explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (1997). Interactivity and Multimedia Interfaces. Instructional Science, 25, 79-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. R. (2003). Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(1), 41-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinaltenkamp, M., Fließ, S., & Jacob, F. (1996). Customer Integration - Von der Kundenorientierung zur Kundenintegration (pp. 13-24). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. D. (2008). Network effects. In Durlauf, S. N., & Blume, L. E. (Eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (pp. 915-917). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, H., Cho, C.-H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: a structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 57-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, S. (1995). Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 21-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P. R., & Matthing, J. (2002). Users as a Hidden Resource for Creativity: Findings from an Experimental Study on User Involvement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 55-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuk, G., & Yeung, F. T. (2002). Interactivity in e-commerce. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(3), 223-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., & Mintzberg, H. (1996). Customizing Customization. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 21-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-H., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2000). The complementarity of mass customization and electronic commerce. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), 81-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2005). The Impact of Perceptions of Interactivity on Customer Trust and Transaction Intentions in Mobile Commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3), 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. A. (2003). An Interactive Communication Technology Adoption Model. Communication Theory, 13, 345-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. A. (2007). Interactive Media Technology and Electronic Shopping. In Lin, C. A., & Atkin, D. J. (Eds.), Communication technology and social change: theory and implications (pp. 203-223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhoff, G. S., & Berry, M. J. A. (2002). Mining the Web: Transforming Customer Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2003). Generating Value through Online Interaction. Individual and Situational Differences. Competitive Paper Submitted to the 2003 AMS Annual Conference. Retrieved July 9, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol3/issue2/ lombard.html.

  • Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2009). A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 53-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved July 9, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol3/issue2/ lombard.html.

  • Lombard, M., & Snyder-Duch, J. (2001). Interactive advertising and presence: a framework. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(2), Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.jiad.org/vol1/no2/lombard/index.html.

  • Lowe, D., & Hall, W. (1999). Hypermedia and the web. An engineering approach. Chichester et al: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Romano Jr., N. C., Jenkins, J. L., & Guthrie, R. W. (2009). The CMC Interactivity Model: How Interactivity Enhances Communication Quality and Process Satisfaction in Lean-Media Groups. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 155-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macias, W. (2003). A Beginning Look at the Effects of Interactivity, Product Involvement and Web Experience on Comprehension: Brand Web Sites as Interactive Advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 25(2), 31-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, B. L., & Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia. International Communication Gazette, 61(6), 523-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness, Computers in Human Behavior, 4(3), 221-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2004). Strategic Management of e-Business. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J., Jang-Sun, H., & Guiohk, L. (2003). Effects of Structural and Perceptual Factors on Attitudes toward the Website. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 400-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (1998). Who Pays for Content? Funding in Interactive Media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(1). Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue1/mcmillan.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the Eye of the Beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the Website. In Shaver, M. A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 71-78). East Lansing, Michigan State University. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://web.utk.edu/~sjmcmill/Research/mcmillsj.doc.

  • McMillan, S. J. (2002). A Four-part Model of Cyber-Interactivity: Some Cyber-spaces are More Interactive than Others. New Media and Society, 4(2), 271-291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2005). The Researchers and the Concept. Moving Beyond A Blind Examination of Interactivity. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 1-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2006). Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems. In Lievrouw, L. L., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.), Handbook of New Media (pp. 205-230). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, G. (2000). Building stronger brands through online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 43-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K. L., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrilees, B., & Miller, D. (2001) Superstore interactivity: a new self-service paradigm of retail service?. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 29(8), 379-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milheim, W. D. (1996). Interactivity and Computer-based Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(3), 225-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as Mass Medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. (1998). A Look at Interactivity from a Customer Perspective. In Ford, J. B., & Honeycutt, E. J. D. (Eds.), Developments in Marketing Science 21 (pp. 149-154). Norfolk, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, W. R. (2008). Interactivity, concept of. In Donsbach, W. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46, 4-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1977). On conversational interaction with computers. In User-Oriented Design of Interactive Graphic Systems. ACM, New York (pp. 101-113). Reprinted in Baecker, R. M., & Buxton, W. A. S. (Eds.), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Los Altos, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, A. M. (2003). Television over the Internet: technological Challenges. In Noam, E. (Ed.), Internet television (pp. 19-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noori, H. (1990). Economies of integration: a new manufacturing focus. International Journal of Technology Management, 5(5), 577-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71, 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1997). New Metrics for New Media: Toward the Development of Web Measurement Standards. World Wide Web Journal, 2(1), 213-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A., & Stewart, D. W. (2000). Measuring the Effects and Effectiveness of Interactive Advertising: A Research Agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1). Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/pavlou/index.html.

  • Picard, R. G. (2005). Unique characteristics and business dynamics of media products. Journal of Media Business Studies, 2(2), 61-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2002). The Economics and Financing of Media Companies. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2000). Changing business models of online content services; their implications for multimedia and other content producers. The International Journal of Media Management, 2(2), 60-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. (1998). Information, organization, and management: expanding markets and corporate boundaries, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. T. (2001). Die grenzenlose Unternehmung, Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T. (2002). Customer interaction and digitizability – a structural approach. In Rautenstrauch, C., Seelmann-Eggebert, R., & Turowski, K. (Ed.), Moving Towards Mass Customization: Information Systems and Management Principles (pp. 119-138). Berlin/New York: Springer,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., Moeslein, K., & Stotko, C. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration, Production Planning & Control, 15(4), 435-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 79-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2002). The co-creation connection. Strategy and Business, 27, 50-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: cocreating unique value with customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiring, O., & Schweiger, W. (2008). Interactivity: A review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Communications, 33(2), 147-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiring, O. (2009). What do users associate with ‘interactivity’?. A qualitative study on user schemata. New Media & Society, 11(6), 899-920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From Media to Communication. In Hawkins, R. P., Wieman, J. M., & Pingree, S. (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Communication (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html.

  • Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2007). Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research. In Joinson, A. N., McKenna, K.Y.A., Postmes, T., & Reips, U-D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 71-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswamy, A., & Pal, N. (2003). Gaining business value from personalization technologies. In Pal, N., & Rangaswamy, A. (Eds.), The power of one: gaining business value from personalization technologies (pp. 1-9). Victoria: Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, R., & Piller, F. T. (2000). Mass Customization-Konzepte im Electronic Business. In Weiber, R. (Ed.), Handbuch Electronic Business. Informationstechnologien – Electronic Commerce – Geschäftsprozesse (pp. 359-383). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, R., & Piller, F. T. (2009). Interaktive Wertschoepfung: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung, 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Williams, F. (1984). Theories old and new: The study of new media. In Rice, R. E. (Ed.), The new media: Communication, research, and technology (pp. 55-80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Perspectives on Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. In Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.), The Handbook of New Media (pp. 92-114). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (1979). User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 527-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication Technology. The New Media in Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, N. C., & Fjermestad, J. (2003). Electronic Commerce Customer Relationship Management: A Research Agenda. Information Technology and Management, 4, 233-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated Communication. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 397-431). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, D. W., Artis, A., & Rivera, R. (2001). The Future of Interactive Advertising Viewed through an IMC Lens. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(2), Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://jiad.org/article12.

  • Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2009). Human-Computer Interaction Fundamentals, New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicilia, M., Ruiz, S., & Munuera, J. L. (2005). Effects of Interactivity in a Web Site. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 31-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanæs, D. (2000). Understanding Interactivity: Steps to a Phenomenology of Human-Computer Interaction, Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Retrieved June 25, 2008, from http://dag.idi.ntnu.no/interactivity.pdf.

  • Schultz, T. (2000). Mass Media and the Concept of Interactivity: An Exploratory Study of Online Forums and Email. Media, Culture and Society, 22(2), 205-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V., Smith, A. K. & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. Research in Marketing, 20, 153-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T., Aranson, K., & Belardo, S. (1993). The effects of computer mediated interactivity on idea generation: an experimental investigation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 23(3), 737-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shy, O. (2001). The Economics of Network Industries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, D., & Lee, B. (2005). Dimensions of interactivity: Differential effects of social and psychological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved November 10, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/sohn.html.

  • Song, I., & Bucy, E. P. (2008). Interactivity and Political Attitude Formation. A Mediation Model of Online Information Processing. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(2), 29-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of Perceived Web Site Interactivity. Journal of Marketing, 72, 99-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukup, C. (2000). Building a Theory of Multi-Media CMC. New Media & Society, 2(4), 407-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). From Consumer Response to Active Consumer: Measuring the Effectiveness of Interactive Media. Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 376-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process. The Information Society, 20(5), 391-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukpanich, N., & Chen, L.-D. (2000). Interactivity as the driving force behind E-commerce. AMCIS 2000 Proceedings Paper 163. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://ais.bepress.com/amcis2000/163.

  • Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing Interactivity’s Effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 355-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, S. S. (2007). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In Joinson, A. N., McKenna, K., & Postmes, T. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 89-102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., & Bellur, S. (2010). Designing interactivity in media interfaces: a communications perspective. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2010 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1, 2247-2256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. (2003). A generic conceptual framework of interactive service quality. Managing Service Quality, 13(4), 267-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: An initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. J. (1992). Introduction: The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces. In P. J. Thomas (Ed.), The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave, New York: Bantham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredinnick, L. (2006). Web 2.0 and Business. Business Information Review, 23(4), 228-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M., & Jiao, J. (2001). Mass customisation. In Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering (pp. 684-709). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. M., & Piller, F. T. (2003). The Customer Centric Enterprise. Advances in Mass Customization and Personalisation, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., Warkentin, M., & Chung, H. M. (2002). Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective, Pearson Education, New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. L. (2004). The emerging era of customer advocacy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2), 77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Yadav, M. S. (2002). Marketing Strategy and the Internet: An Organizing Framework. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 296-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2002). Open Source Projects as Horizontal Innovation Networks - By and For Users. MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4366-02. Retrieved March 30, 2006, from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/papers/UserInnovNetworksMgtSci.pdf.

  • von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users. Management Science, 44(5), 629-644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermerve, S. (2000). How increasing value to customers improves business results. Sloan Management Review, 42, 27-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulkan, N. (2003). The Economics of E-Commerce. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E., Jr. (1996). Perspectives - The Future of Interactive Marketing. Harvard Business Review (November-December), 156-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E., Jr. (1998). Commentary: Interactivity and Marketing Paradigm Shifts. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 54-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, R. T. (1997). Electronic Commerce: Definition, Theory, and Context. The Information Society, 13, 1-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikstroem, S. (1996a). Value creation by company-consumer interaction. Journal of Marketing Management, 12, 359-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikstroem, S. (1996b). The customer as co-producer. European Journal of Marketing, 30(4), 6-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy, 25, 856-899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F., Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research Methods and the New Media, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organisation: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanism of Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J., & Rangaswamy, A. (2001). Customerization: The Next Revolution in Mass Customization. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 13-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Strategic Development of Business Models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for Creating Value on the Internet. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 272-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G. (2005). The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Towards the Website. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2). Retrieved September 17, 2005, from http://www.jiad.org/ vol5/no2/wu/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G. (2006). Conceptualizing and Measuring the Perceived Interactivity of Websites. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 28(1), 87-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, R. (2005a). Interactivity in the Electronic Marketplace: An Exposition of the Concept and Implications for Research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 585-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, P. R. (2005b). Understanding product migration to the electronic marketplace: A conceptual framework. Journal of Retailing, 81(2), 125-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C. Y., & Stout, P. A. (2001). Factors Affecting Users’ Interactivity with the Web Site and the Consequences of Users’ Interactivity. In Taylor, C. R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 43-48). Villanova, PA: Villanova University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, W. S., Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2010). The role of interactivity in e-tailing: Creating value and increasing satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(2), 89-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing Involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipkin, P. (2001). The limits of mass customisation. Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 81-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, H. L., Morris, M. G., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1998). Examining E-Mail Use in the Context of Virtual Organizations: Implications for Theory and Practice. International Journal of Elelectronic Commerce, 3(Fall), 8-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 660-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonito, J. A., Burgoon, J. K., Ramirez, A., & Dunbar, N. E. (2000). Participation and Decision Making: The Role of Interactivity in Communications Processes and Outcomes. Paper Presented at the 2000 National Communication Association Convention, Seattle, Washington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, R., & Heinen, S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective, Part 1: The Causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. P. (2004). Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept, Information Society. An International Journal, 20(5), 375-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 553-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C.-H., & Leckenby, J. D. (1999). ‘Interactivity as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness: Antecedents and Consequences of Interactivity in Web Advertising’, Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Pullman, Washington: American Academy of Advertising, 162-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies, in: Jablin, F. M., Putnam, L. L., Roberts, K. L., & Porter, L. W. (Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Communication. An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 420-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message Equivocality, Media Selection and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: the Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, U., & Mishra, P. (2001). Leadership Effectiveness. A Study of Constituent Factors. Journal of Management Research, 1(4), 254-263

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A Social Influence Model of Technology Use, in: Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. (Eds.) Organizations and Communication Technology, Newbury Park, 117-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, M. J. (1981). Key Recurrent Issues in the Implementation Process. MIS Quarterly, 5(2), 47-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, L., Jankowski, N. W., & Etienne, R. (1996). ‘Interactivity from the Perspective of Communication Studies’, in: Jankowski, N. W., Hanssen, L. (Eds.). Contours of Multimedia: Recent Technological, Theoretical, and Empirical Developments, University of Luton Press, 61-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, C. (2000). ‘Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences’. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1): http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/heeter/, accessed March 25, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in Group decision making: Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-Face versus Computerized Conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäckel, M. (1995). Interaktion. Soziologische Anmerkungen zu einem Begriff. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 463-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (1998). ‘Interactivity’ – Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 185-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A Concept Explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 143-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S. (2000). Interactivity: A New Approach, Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Communication technology and Policy Division, Phoenix, http://list.msu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0101a&L=aejmc&F=&S=&P=14105, retrieved June 8, 2005.

  • Lengel, R., & Daft, R. (1988). The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill. Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 225-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information Technology and Organization Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity in the Eye of the Beholder: Function, Perception, Involvement and Attitude toward the Web Site. Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising, 71-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2002). Interactivity, in: Jones, S. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of New Media, London: Sage, 241-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J. (2005). The Researcher and the Concept: Moving Beyond a Blind Examination of Interactivity. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), http://www.jiad.org/vol5/no2/mcmillan, retrieved May 18, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From Media to Communication, in: Hawkins, R. P., Wieman, J. M., & Pingree, S. (eds.). Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Communication, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 110-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1984). Mediated group communication, in: Rice, R. E. & Associates (Eds.). The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 129-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1987). Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation. Journal of Communication, 37, 65-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness. Organization Science, 3, 475-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (1979). User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 527-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, B. (2002). E-mail: Does it need to be managed? Can it be managed?. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 7(2), 83-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, G. S., Daft, R. L, & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Media Selection and Managerial Characteristics in Organisational Communications. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 151-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Communications. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing Interactivity’s Effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 387-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding managers’ media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective, in: Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W. (Eds.). Organizations and communication technology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 71-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Communication Research, 14(5), 553-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Clemens Murschetz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murschetz, P.C. (2019). Einzelbeiträge. In: Die digitale Mediamorphose und der Wandel der traditionellen Massenmedien aus Sicht der Medienökonomie. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27965-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27965-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27964-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27965-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics