Skip to main content

Simplification Of Complexity: The Use Of Simulation To Analyse The Reliability Of Cognition

  • Conference paper
Reliability and Safety Assessment of Dynamic Process Systems

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 120))

Abstract

In order to be adequate, safety and reliability analyses of man-machine interaction must account for the dynamics of the interaction. There is therefore a need for models that can describe the dynamics of human cognition and performance. Most existing models are developed for static analyses and are too restrained in their assumptions to serve as a basis for simulations. The paper describes a contextual control model of cognition, which focuses on how the choice of actions is determined by how the current situation develops. This model has been used as part of a joint man-machine simulation tool designed to evaluate the effect of human actions on system performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosness, R., Hollnagel, E., Sten, T. Taylor, J. R. Human reliability assessment methodology for the European Space Agency (STF75 F92020 ). Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Park, K. S. Human reliability. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Swain, A. D. Guttmann, H. E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278. Sandia National Laboratories, NM., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Mey, M. The cognitive paradigm. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollnagel, E. Woods, D. D. Cognitive systems engineering: New wine in new bottles. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 1983, 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Woods, D. D. Roth, E. M. Cognitive systems engineering. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Popper, K. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson Co, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollnagel, E. Reliability of cognition: Foundations of human reliability analysis. Loncon: Academic Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hollnagel, E., Cacciabue P. C. Rouhet J.-C. The use of an integrated system simulation for risk analysis and reliability assessment. 7th International Symposium on Loss Prevention, 4–8 May, 1992, Taormina, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mancini, G. Modelling humans and machines. In E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini D. D. Woods (Eds.), Intelligent decision support in process environments. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amendola, A. Accident sequence dynamic simulation versus event trees. In G. E. Apostolakis, P. Kafka G. Mancini (Eds.), Accident sequence modeling. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bainbridge, L. Mental models in cognitive skill: The example of industrial process operation. In A. Rutherford Y. Rogers (Eds.), Models in the mind. London: Academic Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reason, J. T. Human error. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Rasmussen, J. Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North-Holland, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cacciabue, P. C., Cojazzi, G., Hollnagel, E. Mancini, S. Analysis and modelling of pilot-airplane interaction by an integrated simulation approach. IFAC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woods, D. D., Roth, E. M. Pople, H. Jr. Modeling human intention formation for human reliability assessment. In G. E. Apostolakis, P. Kafka, G. Mancini (Eds.), Accident sequence modelling: Human actions, system response, intelligent decision support. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moray, N. Dougherty’s dilemma and the one-sidedness of human reliability analysis (HRA). Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 29, 1990, 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hollnagel, E. (1994). Simplification Of Complexity: The Use Of Simulation To Analyse The Reliability Of Cognition. In: Aldemir, T., Siu, N.O., Mosleh, A., Cacciabue, P.C., Göktepe, B.G. (eds) Reliability and Safety Assessment of Dynamic Process Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 120. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03041-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03041-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08178-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03041-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics