Abstract
Wirtschaftsordnungstheorie, or simply Ordnungstheorie, and the French Regulation theory are two theoretical constructions in which the connection between the historical character of the economy and the necessarily theoretical dimension of economics has been and is most investigated.1 How to articulate these two aspects has been a permanent subject of debate since the nineteenth century. This question was already addressed in the Methodenstreit and by Thorstein Veblen (Veblen 1919). However, both Ordnungstheorie and the theory of Regulation are uniquely articulated schemes in their attempts at providing theoretical alternatives to what they perceive to be an unsatisfactory state of scientific economics. This basic dissatisfaction arises in short from the lack of integration of history and theory. The aim of this contribution is to identify a common salient feature related to this issue and developed independently in these theories. It is this feature and the argumentation deriving from it which contribute mostly to the design of these theories as alternative research programmes to what they perceive as an economics mainstream. Although they do not explicitly name and conceive it as “complexity”, its substance is what a noticeable part of present-day complexity theory deals with. It even reaches such a high degree of complexity that it compels a change in the method of theorizing. Such a kind of complexity may be called essential complexity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aglietta,M.: Régulation et crises du capitalisme. L’expérience des Etats-Unis Paris (Calmann-Lévy) 1976. Published in English as: Regulation and Crisis of Capitalism, New York (Monthly Review Press) 1982.
Amable, B., Boyer, R., Lordon, F.: “The ad hoc in Economics: The Pot Calling the Kettle Black”, in: A. D’Autume, J. Cartelier (Eds.): Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science? Cheltenham (Edward Elgar) 1997, chap. 18.
Blaug, M.: “Kuhn versus Lakatos or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics”, in: S. J. Latsis (Ed.): Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1976.
Boyer, R., Mistral, J.: Accumulation, inflation, crises, Paris (PUF) 1978.
Boyer, R.: Théorie de la régulation: une analyse critique, Paris (La Découverte) 1987.
Boyer, R. (1988a): “Technical Change and the Theory of ‘Régulation’”, in: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete (Eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory, London (Pinter) 1988, chap. 4.
Boyer, R. (1988b): “Formalizing Growth Regimes”, in: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete (Eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory, London (Pinter) 1988, chap. 27.
Boyer, R.: “La crise de la macroéconomie, une conséquence de la méconnaissance des institutions?”, L’Actualité économique. Revue d’analyse économique, 68/1–2 (1992), pp. 43–68.
Boyer, R., Saillard, Y. (Eds.) Théorie de la régulation. L’état des savoirs, Paris (La Découverte) 1995.
Carabelli, A. M.: On Keynes’s Method, London (Macmillan) 1988.
D’autume, A., Cartelier, J. (Eds.): Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science? Cheltenham (Edward Elgar) 1997.
Delorme, R.: “An Alternative Theoretical Framework for State-Economy Interactions in Transforming Economies”, Emergo, 2/4 (1995) pp. 5–24.
Delorme, R.: “The Foundational Bearing of Complexity”, in: A. Amin, J. Hausner (Eds.): Beyond Market and Hierarchy. Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, Cheltenham (Edward Elgar) 1997, chap. 2.
Delorme, R.: Complexity and Evolutionary Theorising in Economics, Paper presented at the International Workshop on the Evolution and Development of Evolutionary Economics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, July 1999.
Delorme, R.: “Regulation as an Analytical Perspective. The French Approach”, in: A. Midttun, E. Svindland (Eds.): Approaches to and Dilemmas in Economic Regulation. London (Macmillan) forthcoming 2000.
Dumenil, G., Levy, D.: “Should Economics be a Hard Science?”, in: A. D’autume, J. Cartelier (Eds.): Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science? Cheltenham (Edward Elgar) 1997.
Eucken, W.: The Foundations of Economics. London/Edinburgh/Glasgow (William Hodge) 1950.
Hausman, D. M. : The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1992.
Hayek, F. A.: “The Pretence of Knowledge”, Nobel Memorial Lecture, 11 December 1974, American Economic Review, 79/6 (December 1989), pp. 3–7.
Hayek, F. A.: “The Theory of Complex Phenomena”, in: F. A. Hayek: Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago (University of Chicago Press) 1967, chap. 2.
Keynes, J. M.: A Treatise on Probability, London (Macmillan) 1973 (= Collected Writings, Vol. 8). First edition: 1921.
Kirman, A. “The Evolution of Economic Theory”, in: A. D’Autume, J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science? Cheltenham (Edward Elgar) 1997, chap. 8.
Latsis, S. J.: “A Research Programme in Economics”, in: S. J. Latsis (Ed.): Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1976.
Le Moigne, J.-L.: La modélisation des systèmes complexes, Paris (Dunod) 1990.
Le Moigne, J.-L.: Le constructivisme. Tome 1: des fondements, Tome 2: des épistémologies, Paris (ESF) 1994.
Morin, E.: La méthode, 4 Vols., Paris (Seuil) 1977–1991.
Veblen, T.: The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, New Brunswick (Transaction Publishers) 1990. First edition: 1919.
Weaver, W.: “Science and Complexity”, American Scientist 36/4 (1948), pp. 536–544.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Delorme, R. (2001). Ordnungstheorie and Theory of Regulation Compared from the Standpoint of Complexity. In: Labrousse, A., Weisz, JD. (eds) Institutional Economics in France and Germany. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04472-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04472-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08744-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04472-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive