Abstract
In the formulations of standard epidemic models it is usually assumed that, as far as the spread of the disease is concerned, the community consists of homogeneous individuals who mix uniformly with one another. This is a simplifying assumption which helps to make the mathematics tractable. Empirical evidence suggests that in real world epidemics there is often variability among individuals. It is therefore important to determine how the introduction of heterogeneity among individuals is likely to affect any conclusions arrived at from consideration of the standard epidemic models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Athreya K. B. & Ney P. E., "Branching Processes," Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.
Bailey N. T. J., The use of chain-binomials with a variable chance of infection for the analysis of intra-household epidemics, Biometrika 40 (1953), 279-286.
Bailey N. T. J., Some problems in the statistical analysis of epidemic data (with discussion), J. R. Statist. Soc. B 17 (1955), 35-68.
Ball F., Deterministic and stochastic epidemics with several kinds of susceptibles, Adv. Appl. Prob. 17 (1985), 1-22.
Barbour A. D., MacDonald's model and the transmission of bilharzia, Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72 (1978), 6-15.
Becker N. G., Carrier-borne epidemics in a community consisting of different groups, J. Appl. Prob. 10 (1973), 491-501.
Becker N. G., On a general epidemic model, Theor. Pop. Bioi. 11 (1977a)), 23-36. (Correction: ibid 14, 498.)
Becker N. G., Estimation for the discrete time branching process with applications to epidemics,
Biometrics 33 (1977b), 515-522.
Becker N. G., An epidemic chain model, Biometrics 36 (1980), 249-254.
Cane V. & McNamee R., The spread of infection in a heterogeneous population, J. Appl. Prob. 19 A (1982), 173-184.
Dietz K., Models for vector-borne parasitic diseases, in: Vito Volterra Symposium on Mathematical
Models in Biology, ed. C. Barigozzi, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 39 (1980), 264-277. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Griffiths D. A., Maximum likelihood estimation for the beta-binomial distribution and an application to the household distribution of the total number of cases of a disease, Biometrics 29 (1973), 637-648.
Hougaard P., Life table methods for heterogeneous populations: Distributions describing the heterogeneity, Biometrika 71 (1984), 75-83.
Isham V., Mathematical modelling of the transmission dynamics of HIV infection and AIDS: a review, J. R. Statist. Soc. A 151 (1988), 5-30.
Karlin S. & Taylor H. M. M., “A First Course in Stochastic Processes,” Academic Press, New York, 1975.
Lefevre C. & Malice M., Comparisons for carrier-borne epidemics in heterogeneous and homogeneous populations, J. Appl. Pro b. 25 (1988), 663-67 4.
Muench H., “Catalytic Models in Epidemiology,” Harvard University Press, 1959. von Bahr B. & Martin-Lof A., Threshold limit theorems for some epidemic processes, Research
Report 108, Inst. for Forsiikringsmatematik och Matematisk Statistik, University of Stockholm (1978).
Weiss G. H., On the spread of epidemics by carriers, Biometrics 21 (1965), 481-490.
Whittle P., The outcome of a stochastic epidemic-a note on Bailey's paper, Biometrika 42 (1955), 116-122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Becker, N., Marschner, I. (1990). The effect of heterogeneity on the spread of disease. In: Gabriel, JP., Lefèvre, C., Picard, P. (eds) Stochastic Processes in Epidemic Theory. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 86. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10067-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10067-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52571-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10067-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive