Abstract
Legal positivism is the explanation that is most often suggested to explain why judges contribute to the atrocities of authoritarian regimes. A reason for this is that this explanation accords with two basic facts of judicial behaviour. The first is the tendency judges have, as everyone else, to adhere to authority. Obedience to authority is one of the most important factors that explain why people agree to commit the most horrible offences when ordered to. The second is more particular to judges and has to do with the ideology of not getting involved in politics. Particularly in situations with great political conflicts, taking a stand on the decisions and measures of the leaders of the government is perceived by judges as political action. Authority and avoidance of getting mixed up in politics are explanations of judicial complicity at the psychological and ideological levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Osiel (1995), p. 482.
- 2.
Osiel (1995), p. 484.
- 3.
Rüthers (2012), p. 444.
- 4.
Rüthers (2012), p. 526.
- 5.
Curran (2005), p. 488.
- 6.
Weisberg (1996), p. 48.
- 7.
Weisberg (1996), p. 81.
- 8.
Curran (1998–1999), pp. 39–40.
- 9.
Kirchheimer (1961), p. 212, note 78.
- 10.
See pp. 60–68 above.
- 11.
See the analysis of Osiel (1995), pp. 489–510.
- 12.
Osiel (1995), p. 544.
- 13.
Dyzenhaus (2010), p. 53.
- 14.
Rüthers (2007), p. 558.
- 15.
Milgram (2004), p. 17.
- 16.
Browning (1998), p. 71.
- 17.
Pauer-Studer (2012), p. 386.
- 18.
Pauer-Studer (2012), p. 389.
- 19.
Buck v. Bell, Superintendent of State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded, 271 U.S. 200 1927.
- 20.
Welzer (2007), Kindle edition loc. 160.
- 21.
Glover (2012), pp. 407–408.
- 22.
Rüthers (2007), p. 563.
- 23.
Rüthers (2007), p. 502.
- 24.
Angermund (1990), pp. 66–67.
- 25.
Kirchheimer (1961), p. 211.
- 26.
Angermund (1990), pp. 35–40.
- 27.
Kirchheimer (1961), p. 213.
- 28.
Angermund (1990), pp. 48–61.
- 29.
Pereira (2005), location 887–896.
- 30.
See Pauer-Studer (2014).
- 31.
D. Utah, 2004 U.S. v. Angelos 345 F.Supp.2d 1227.
- 32.
See Hilbink (2008), p. 102.
- 33.
Hilbink (2008), pp. 120–129.
- 34.
See Verner (1984), p. 483.
- 35.
- 36.
Stoltzfus (1996), p. 261.
- 37.
Haffner (2003), p. 151.
- 38.
Glover (2012), p. 385.
- 39.
Dugard (1984), p. 292.
- 40.
For a critical discussion of the case and the law and circumstances surrounding it, see Simpson (1988).
- 41.
Liversidge v. Anderson and Morrison (1941) 3 All E.R. 338 (H.L.).
- 42.
US Supreme Court 341 U.S. 494.
- 43.
Abel (2007), p. 397.
- 44.
Rehnquist (1998), loc. 3670.
- 45.
Curran (1998–1999), pp. 27–29.
References
Abel RL (2007) Contesting legality in the United States after September 11. In: Halliday TC, Karpik L, Feeley MM (eds) Fighting for political freedom comparative studies of the legal complex and political liberalism. Hart, Oxford and Portland
Angermund R (1990) Deutsche Richtershaft 1919–1945. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main
Browning CR (1998) Ordinary men reserve police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. Harper Perennial, New York
Curran VG (1998–1999) The legalization of racism in a constitutional state: democracy’s suicide in Vichy France. Hastings Law J 50:1–96
Curran VG (2005) Law’s past and Europe’s future. German Law J 6:483–512
Dugard J (1984) Should judges resign? – a reply to Professor Wacks. S Afr Law J 101:286–294
Dyzenhaus D (2010) Hard cases in wicked legal systems pathologies of legality, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Glover J (2012) Humanity a moral history of the 20th century, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven
Haffner S (2003) Defying Hitler: a memoir. Phoenix, London
Hilbink L (2008) Agents of anti-politics: courts in Pinochet’s Chile. In: Ginsburg T, Moustafa T (eds) Rule by law: the politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kirchheimer O (1961) Political justice: the use of legal procedure for political ends. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Milgram S (2004) Obedience to authority, New York 1974 published by Perennial Classics with a foreword by Jerome S. Bruner New York
Osiel MJ (1995) Dialogue with dictators: judicial resistance in Argentina and Brazil. Law Soc Inq 20:481–560
Pauer-Studer H (2012) Law and morality under evil conditions: the SS Judge Konrad Morgen. Jurisprudence 3(2):367–390
Pauer-Studer H (2014) Einleitung: Rechtfertigung des Unrechts. Das Rechtsdenken im Nationalsozialismus. In: Pauer-Studer H, Fink J (eds) Rechtfertigungen des Unrechts Da Rechtsdenken im Nationalsozialismus in Originaltexten. Suhrkamp, Berlin
Pereira AW (2005) Political (in)justice authoritarianism and the rule of law in Brazil, Chile and Argentina. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (Kindle edition)
Rehnquist WH (1998) All laws but one civil liberties in wartime. Vintage Books, New York (Kindle edition)
Rüthers B (2007) Hatte die Rechtsperversion in den Deutschen Diktaturen ein Gesicht? Juristenzeitung 11:556–564
Rüthers B (2012) Die unbegrenzte Auslegung: Zum Wandel der Privatrechtsordnung im Nationalsozialismus 7. Ausg. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Simpson AWB (1988) Rhetoric, reality and regulation 18B. Denning Law J 3:123–153
Stoltzfus N (1996) Resistance of the heart intermarriage and the Rosenstrasse protest in Nazi Germany. W.W. Norton & Company, New York
Verner JG (1984) The independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: a review of the literature. J Latin Am Stud 16:463–506
Weisberg RH (1996) Vichy Law and the Holocaust in France. Harwood Academic Publisher, Amsterdam
Welzer H (2007) Täter Wie aus ganz normalen Menschen Massenmörder werden. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main (Kindle edition)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graver, H.P. (2015). Beyond Legal Theory as Explanation. In: Judges Against Justice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44292-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44293-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)