Abstract
I defend classical decision theory from the challenge posed to it by the HI-LO game.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bacharach, M.: Beyond individual choice: teams and frames in game theory. Princeton University Press (2006)
Colman, A.M.: Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limita- tions of rationality in social interaction.”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26, 139–153 (2003)
Gold, N., Sugden, R.: Theories of team agency. In: Peter, F., Schmid, H.B. (eds.) Rationality and Commitment, pp. 280–312. Oxford University Press (2008)
Ullmann-Margalit, E., Morgenbesser, S.: Picking and choosing. Social Research, 757–785 (1977)
Vasudevan, A.: On the a priori and a posteriori assessment of probabilities. Journal of Applied Logic 11(4), 440–451 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, B. (2015). Solving the HI-LO Puzzle. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W., Wang, Wf. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48560-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48561-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)