Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consequences of Line Balancing of an Assembly Line on the Health, Satisfaction and Performance Indicators of Assembly Line Workers in a Case Study of an Automotive Manufacturer

  • Conference paper
Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes

  • 1156 Accesses

Abstract

In assembly-line work the term cycle time refers to the period of time between the completion of one product and the completion of the next one. Against the context of work design this parameter is important as it seems to be related both to the physical and the mental well-being of workers as well as to their job satisfaction and their performance. In order to gain a better understanding of the underlying causal relationships a structural equation modeling approach was taken in this work. By this means it is possible to hypothesize on the interaction of variables and to test these hypotheses empirically. Within a field experimental study at an automobile manufacturing company it was shown that shorter cycle times lower the physical well-being of workers—but, however, this fact did not affect the overall performance outcome. Besides, it could have been shown that cycle-related working conditions in general—regardless of the length of cycle times—reduced the mental well-being of assembly workers. This result is important as the mental well-being did not only reinforce the physical conditions, but it turned out to be also relevant for the performance of the workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adler P, Goldoftas B, Levine D (1997) Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota production system: a case study of NUMMI’s 1993 Model Introduction. Ind Labor Relat Rev 50(3):416–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berggren C (1993) Alternatives to lean production: work organization in the Swedish auto industry, No. 22. Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2008) Assembly line balancing: which model to use when? Int J Prod Econ 111:509–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke RJ (1969–1970) Occupational and life strains, satisfaction and mental health. J Bus Admin 1:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Büttner J (2015) Auswirkungen der Austaktung einer Automobil-Montagelinie auf menschliche Leistungsfaktoren, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Dissertationsschrift

    Google Scholar 

  6. Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byrne B (2010) Structural equation modeling using AMOS, Basic concepts, applications, and programming, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer L, Lück HE (1972) Entwicklung einer Skala zur Messung von Arbeitszufriedenheit (SAZ). In: Psychologie und Praxis. H. 16, pp 64–76

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frieling E (Hrsg) (1997) Automobilmontage in Europa. Frankfurt/Main Campus

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frieling E, Kotzab D, Enriquez-Diaz A, Sytch A (2012) Mit der Taktzeit am Ende – die älteren Beschäftigten in der Automobilmontage, Ergonomia, vol 1. Auflage, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fucini J, Fucini S (1990) Working for the Japanese: inside Mazda’s American auto plant. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garrahan P, Stewart P (1992) The Nissan Enigma-flexibility at work in a local economy. Mansell, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herzberg F, Mausner B, Snyderman B (1959) The motivation to work. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyle RH (1999) Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iffländer J, Schmicker S, Wassmann S (2013) Projektbericht, Erfassung psychischer Belastungen in der Cockpitmontage und Ableitung entsprechender Arbeitsgestaltungsempfehlungen – Projektnummer AZ-76988089, in Auftrag von der Volkswagen AG, durchgeführt von der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg – Fakultät für Maschinenbau – Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft, Fabrikautomatisierung und Fabrikbetrieb – Lehrstuhl für Arbeitswissenschaft und Arbeitsgestaltung in Kooperation mit der METOP GmbH – An-Institut der Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

  17. Judge T, Thoresen C, Bono J, Patton G (2001) The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. Psychol Bull 127(3):376–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapellusch JM, Kapellusch JM, Garg A (2012) Conference proceeding: ergonomic cycle time: a proposed metric for the design of safe, productive manufacturing jobs. 10th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, Birmingham, England, 09/2012

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kvarnström S (1996) Stress prevention for blue-collar workers in assembly-line production, Conditions of work and welfare facilities branch. Working paper, Genf

    Google Scholar 

  20. Landsbergis PA, Cahill J, Schnall P (1999) The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. J Occup Health Psychol 4(2):108–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewchuk W, Robertson D (1996) Working conditions under lean production: a worker based benchmarking study. Asia Pacific Bus Rev 2(4):60–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liker JK, Meier DP (2007) Praxisbuch der Toyota Weg: Für jedes Unternehmen. FinanzBuch Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liker JK (2007) Der Toyota Weg, 14 Managementprinzipien des weltweit erfolgreichsten Automobilkonzerns. FinanzBuch Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lin L, Drury C, Kim S-W (2001) Ergonomics and quality in paced assembly lines. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 11(4):377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM (2004) The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J Occup Organ Psychol 77:11–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Melamed S, Ben-Avi I, Luz J, Green M (1995) Objective and subjective work monotony: effects on job satisfaction, psychological distress, and absenteeism in blue-collar workers. J Appl Psychol 80(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Neuhaus R (2009) KPB – Kurzverfahren Psychische Belastung. Ein Verfahren zur Beurteilung psychischer Belastungen, 2. überarbeitete Auflage, Wirtschaftsverlag Bachem, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  28. Notbohm G (1984) Mehrfachbelastungen und Gesundheitsrisiken am Arbeitsplatz. In: Gros E (ed) Anwendungsbezogene Arbeits-, Betriebs- und Organisationspsychologie. Verlag Angewandte Psychologie, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nübling M, Stößel U, Hasselhorn H-M, Michaelis M, Hofmann F (2005) Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen – Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ), Bremerhaven, Wirtschaftsverlag NW (Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Fb 1058)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nunally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pütz D (2010) Psychosoziale Einflussfaktoren bei Beschwerden am Bewegungsapparat. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V., Mensch- und Prozessorientierte Arbeitsgestaltung im Fahrzeugbau, Herbstkonferenz 2010 der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft. Dortmund, GfA Press

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richter G (2000) Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung – Stress, psychische Ermüdung, Monotonie, psychische Sättigung. In: BAuA (Hrsg), Arbeitswissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse: Forschungsergebnisse für die Praxis (Nr. 116), Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rimann M, Udris I (1997) Subjektive Arbeitsanalyse: Der Fragebogen SALSA. In: Strohm O, Ulich E (Hrsg), Unternehmen arbeitspsychologisch bewerten. Ein Mehr-Ebenen-Ansatz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Mensch, Technik und Organisation. Zürich, vdf Hochschulverlag, pp 281–298

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stewart P, Garrahan P (1995) Employee responses to new management techniques in the auto industry. Work Employ Soc 9(3):517–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (2001) Arbeitsbewältigungsindex – Work Ability Index, 1. Auflage, Wirtschaftsverlag NW Verlag für neue Wissenschaft GmbH, Bremerhaven, Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Übersetzung, Ü 14

    Google Scholar 

  36. Udris I, Frese M (1999) Belastung und Beanspruchung. In: Hoyos Graf C, Frese D (Hrsg) Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie – GL Lehrbuch. Psychologie Verlagsunion, Weinheim, pp 429–445

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weiber R, Mühlhaus D (2010) Strukturgleichungsmodellierung, Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS. SmartPLS und SPSS, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weyer G, Hodapp V, Neuhäuser S (1980) Weiterentwicklung von Fragebogenskalen zur Erfassung der subjektiven Belastung und Unzufriedenheit im beruflichen Bereich (SBUS-B). Psychologische Beiträge 22:335–355

    Google Scholar 

  39. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The machine that changed the world. Harper-Perennial, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg, Germany

    Johanna Büttner

  2. ifab-Institute of Human and Industrial Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany

    Barbara Deml & Sebastian Neveling

Authors
  1. Johanna Büttner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Deml
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Neveling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Büttner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ifab-Institute of Human and Industrial Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany

    Barbara Deml

  2. REFA-Institut e.V., Dortmund, Germany

    Patricia Stock

  3. Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Ralph Bruder

  4. Institute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    Christopher Marc Schlick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Büttner, J., Deml, B., Neveling, S. (2016). Consequences of Line Balancing of an Assembly Line on the Health, Satisfaction and Performance Indicators of Assembly Line Workers in a Case Study of an Automotive Manufacturer. In: Deml, B., Stock, P., Bruder, R., Schlick, C.M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48661-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48661-0_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48659-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48661-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation