Zusammenfassung
Die Frage nach der optimalen Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen wird innerhalb unterschiedlicher Disziplinen erforscht. Neben der (Innen-)Architektur, die sich mit der Gestaltung von Räumen und Bürogebäuden befasst, versucht auch die Psychologie das Erleben und Verhalten in Arbeitsumgebungen zu verstehen, zu erklären und vorherzusagen. Der Begriff Arbeitsumgebung umfasst hierbei einerseits Arbeitsräume und Büroumgebungen, betrifft aber auch generell die aktuelle Umgebung, in der sich der/ die Arbeitende befindet. In dem Kapitel werden neue Ansätze in der Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen berichtet und deren Effekte auf das arbeitende Individuum diskutiert. Dies geschieht getrennt für die Wissensarbeit sowie handwerkliche Industriearbeit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Literatur zu Abschn. 3.2
Appel‐Meulenbroek, R., Groenen, P., & Janssen, I. (2011). An end‐user’s perspective on activity‐based office concepts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111136830.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011.
Blok, M. M., Groenesteijn, L., Schelvis, R., & Vink, P. (2012). New Ways of Working: Does flexibility in time and location of work change work behavior and affect business outcomes? Work, 41, 2605–2610. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-1028-2605.
Bodin Danielsson, C., & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment & Behavior, 40, 636–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307459.
Bodin Danielsson, C., Chungkham, H. S., Wulff, C., & Westerlund, H. (2014). Office design’s impact on sick leave rates. Ergonomics, 57, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.871064.
Brown, G. (2009). Claiming a corner at work: measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.004.
Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 577–594. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.17293710.
Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Desor, J. A. (1972). Toward a psychological theory of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032112.
Elsbach, K. D. (2004). Interpreting workplace identities: the role of office décor. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 25, 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.233.
Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/078559809.
Gerdenitsch, C., Korunka, C., & Hertel, G. (2017). The effects of an activity-based flexible office redesign on office workers: A longitudinal study. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517697766.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative „description of personality“: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.
Goodrich, R. (1986). The perceived office: The office environment as experienced by its users. In J. D. Wineman (Hrsg.), Behavioral issues in office design (S. 109–133). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Hertel, G., Rauschenbach, C., Thielgen, M. M., & Krumm, S. (2015). Are older workers more active copers? Longitudinal effects of age-contingent coping on strain at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 514–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1995.
Hoendervanger, J. G., de Been, I., van Yperen, N. W., Mobach, M. P., & Albers, C. J. (2016). Flexibility in use: Switching behavior and satisfaction in activity-based work environments. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2015-0033.
Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199.
Kraut, R. E., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Unterstanding effects of proximity on collaboration: implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Hrsg.), Distributed work (S. 137–162). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.
van Meel, J. (2011). The origins of new ways of working: office concepts in the 1970s. Facilities, 29, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111146297.
Meijer, E. E., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Sluiter, J. K. (2009). Effects of office innovation on office workers’ health and performance. Ergonomics, 52, 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130902842752.
Millward, L. J., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Putting employees in their place: the impact of hot desking on organizational and team identification. Organization Science, 18, 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0265.
Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’: towards a ‘self-entrepreneurial’ work force? Concepts and Transformation, 8, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04pon.
Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (2001). Symbols as a language of organizational relationships. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 93–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23004-4.
Robertson, B. J. (2016). Holacracy: Ein revolutionäres Management-System für eine volatile Welt. München: Vahlen.
Ruostela, J., Lönnqvist, A., Palvalin, M., Vuolle, M., Patjas, M., & Raij, A.-L. (2015). „New Ways of Working“ as a tool for improving the performance of a knowledge-intensive company. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.57.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Seddigh, A., Berntson, E., Bodin Danielsson, C., & Westerlund, H. (2014). Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on indicators of health and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.009.
Thielgen, M. M., Krumm, S., & Hertel, G. (2014). When being old pays off: age mitigates adverse effects of low implicit-explicit motive congruency on work motivation. Journal of Career Assessment, 23, 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714547613.
Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: how people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5114.
Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and organizations: the cultural match. Trainings and Development Journal, 37, 28–36.
Wells, M. M. (2000). Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: the role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 20, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0166.
Wohlers, C., & Hertel, G. (2016). Choosing where to work at work – towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269.
Zajonc, R. B., Heingartner, A., & Herman, E. M. (1969). Social enhancement and impairment of performance in the cockroach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028063.
Literatur zu Abschn. 3.3
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (applications and Reviews), 23, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Baruch-Feldman, C., Brondolo, E., Ben-Dayan, D., & Schwartz, J. (2002). Sources of social support and burnout, job satisfaction, and productivity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.7.1.84.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499.
Deskmag (2016). Coworking Spaces and their members. Final results of the global coworking survey. Präsentation gehalten auf der GCUC Canada, Montréal. https://www.slideshare.net/carstenfoertsch/the-first-results-of-the-2017-global-coworking-survey, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.
deskmag (2017). The 2017 global coworking survey. http://www.deskmag.com/en/background-of-the-2017-global-coworking-survey
Eckenrode, J. (1983). The mobilization of social supports: some individual constraints. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896802.
Foertsch, C. (2015). First results of the new global coworking survey. Deskmag. http://www.deskmag.com/en/first-results-of-the-new-global-coworking-survey-2015-16, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. (2014). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: the emergence of community in coworking spaces. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 14004–14004. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.139.
Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: a source of social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581.
Gerdenitsch, C., Korunka, C., & Hertel, G. (2018). Need-supply fit in an activity-based flexible office: a longitudinal study during relocation. Environment & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517697766.
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012722.
House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structure and process of social support. Annual Review Sociology, 14, 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001453.
Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. (1980). Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles and social support. Life-span Development and Behavior, 3, 253–286.
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place. New York: Marlowe & Company.
Osca, A., Urien, B., González-Camino, G., Martínez-Pérez, D. M., & Martínez-Pérez, N. (2005). Organisational support and group efficacy: a longitudinal study of main and buffer effects. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510589064.
van Ostren, N. (2011). The art of hosting. Deskmag. http://www.deskmag.com/en/how-to-be-a-good-host-165, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.
Pohler, N. (2012). Neue Arbeitsräume für neue Arbeitsformen: Coworking spaces. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-012-0021-y.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698.
Searle, B., Bright, J. E. H., & Bochner, S. (2001). Helping people to sort it out: The role of social support in the job strain model. Work & Stress, 15, 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370110086768.
Shinn, M., Lehmann, S., & Wong, N. W. (1984). Social interaction and social support. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01107.x.
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070.
Stephens, C., & Long, N. (2000). Communication with police supervisors and peers as a buffer of work-related traumatic stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 407–424.
Taha, L. H., & Caldwell, B. S. (1993). Social isolation and integration in electronic environments. Behavior & Information Technology, 12, 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299308924391.
Vega, G., & Brennan, L. (2000). Isolation and technology: the human disconnect. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810010377435.
Literatur zu Abschn. 3.5
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352, 1573–1576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf265.
Boyle, R. (2016). NASA uses Microsoft’s HoloLens and ProtoSpace to build its next Mars rover in augmented reality. GeekWire. http://www.geekwire.com/2016/nasa-uses-microsoft-hololens-build-mars-rover-augmented-reality, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018
Cavoukian, A. (2009). Privacy by design. The 7 foundational principles. https://iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2011/03/fred_carter.pdf, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.
Constantinescu, C., Popescu, D., Muresan, P.-C., & Stana, S.-I. (2016). Exoskeleton-centered process optimization in advanced factory environments. Procedia CIRP, 41, 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.051.
Davinson, N., & Sillence, E. (2010). It won’t happen to me: promoting secure behaviour among internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1739–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.023.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
DIN EN ISO 10218-1:2012-01, Industrieroboter – Sicherheitsanforderungen – Teil 1: Roboter (ISO 10218-1:2011); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 10218-1:2011
DIN EN ISO 10218-2:2012-06, Industrieroboter – Sicherheitsanforderungen – Teil 2: Robotersysteme und Integration (ISO 10218-2:2011); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 10218-2:2011
DIN EN ISO 12100:2011-03, Sicherheit von Maschinen – Allgemeine Gestaltungsleitsätze – Risikobeurteilung und Risikominderung (ISO 12100:2010); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 12100:2010
DIN EN ISO 9241-110, Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 110: Grundsätze der Dialoggestaltung (ISO 9241-110:2006); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 9241-110:2006
DIN EN ISO 9241-11:2016-01, Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 11: Gebrauchstauglichkeit: Begriffe und Konzepte (ISO/DIS 9241-11:2015); Deutsche und Englische Fassung prEN ISO 9241-11:2015
Dünser, A., Grasset, R., Seichter, H., & Billinghurst, M. (2007). Applying HCI principles to AR systems design. HIT Lab NZ. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35460442.pdf, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.
Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., & Beller, J. (2012). Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: Authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0191.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.
Grau, O. (2003). Virtual art. From illusion to immersion. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347.
Hacker, W., & Sachse, P. (2014). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie – Psychische Regulation von Tätigkeiten (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 59–170.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign (organization development). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hansen, M., & Thiel, C. (2012). Cyber-physical Systems und Privatsphärenschutz. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, 1, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-012-0007-8.
Koren, Y. (2010). The global manufacturing revolution: Product-process-business integration and reconfigurable systems. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9780470618813 https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470618813.
Lackes, R. & Siepermann, M. (2014a). Datensicherheit. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Datensicherheit. Abgerufen von http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/74976/datensicherheit-v8.html
Lackes, R. & Siepermann, M. (2014b). Software-Ergonomie. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Software-Ergonomie. Abgerufen von http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/75685/software-ergonomie-v10.html
LaViola Jr., J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 32, 47–56. http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/~jjl/pubs/cybersick.pdf.
Markis, A., & Ranz, F. (2016). Sicherheit in der Mensch-Roboter Kollaboration – Grundlagen, Herausforderungen, Ausblick. https://www.fraunhofer.at/content/dam/austria/documents/WhitePaperTUEV/White%20Paper_Sicherheit_MRK_Ausgabe%201.pdf, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335.
Michalos, G., Makris, S., Tsarouchi, P., Guasch, T., Kontovrakis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2015). Design considerations for safe human-robot collaborative workplaces. Procedia CIRP, 37, 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.014.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16972-4.
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Onnasch, L., Maier, X., & Jürgensohn, T. (2016). Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion. Eine Taxonomie für alle Anwendungsfälle. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:fokus20160630.
Riccio, G. E., & Stoffregen, T. A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3, 195–240. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0303_2.
Rifkin, J. (2016). Das Ende der Arbeit und ihre Zukunft. Neue Konzepte für das 21. Jahrhundert (4. Aufl.). Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M. S., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction (6. Aufl.). Essex: Pearson. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/DTUI6
Siller, H. (2013). Phishing. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Phishing. Abgerufen von http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/1408512/phishing-v4.html
Spath, D., Ganschar, O., Gerlach, S., Hämmerle, M., Krause, T., Schlund, S. (2013). Produktionsarbeit der Zukunft-Industrie 4.0. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.
Stegmann, S., van Dick, R., Ullrich, J., & Wu, T.-C. T. (2010). Der Work Design Questionnaire: Vorstellung und erste Validierung einer deutschen Version. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-4089/a000002.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision sciences, 27, 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Voigt, K.-I. (2017). Losgröße. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Losgröße. http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/57174/losgroesse-v6.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gerdenitsch, C., Korunka, C. (2019). Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen. In: Digitale Transformation der Arbeitswelt . Die Wirtschaftspsychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55674-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55674-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55673-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55674-0
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)