Skip to main content

Modelling Service Requirements Variability: The DiVA Way

  • Chapter
Service Engineering

Abstract

This chapter tackles the challenges of variability identification, modelling and implementation for service-based systems. The DiVA methodology is applied to the Mobile Phone Service Portability case-study to demonstrate its solutions to these challenges. The DiVA methodology utilises concepts of Aspect-Oriented Software Development to encapsulate service variants in distinct modules and uses Model-Driven Development techniques to analyse and transform conceptual designs into executable services. The DiVA approach provides a tool-supported methodology for managing dynamic variability in adaptive systems and taming system complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Using product line techniques to build adaptive systems (2006). DOI 10.1109/SPLINE.2006.1691586. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SPLINE.2006.1691586

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali, R., Chitchyan, R., Giorgini, P.: Context for goal-level product line derivation. 3rd International Workshop on Dynamic Software Product Lines (DSPL09) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alves, A., Arkin, A., Askary, S., Bloch, B., Curbera, F., Goland, Y., Kartha, N., Sterling, König, D., Mehta, V., Thatte, S., van der Rijn, D., Yendluri, P., Yiu, A.: Web services business process execution language version 2.0. OASIS Committee Draft (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batista, T., Joolia, A., Coulson, G.: Managing dynamic reconfiguration in component-based systems. pp. 1–17 (2005). DOI 10.1007/11494713\1. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11494713\_1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, D.M., Cheng, B.H.C., Zhang, J.: The four levels of requirements engineering for and in dynamic adaptive systems. In: In 11th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ, p. 05 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chitchyan, R., Greenwood, P.: Framework for identifying and modelling of dynamic variability in requirements. DiVA Project, Deliverable D1.2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith, G., Weerawarana, S.: Web service definition language (wsdl). Tech. rep. (2001). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl

    Google Scholar 

  8. David, P.C., Ledoux, T.: An aspect-oriented approach for developing self-adaptive fractal components. In: W. Löwe, M. Südholt (eds.) Software Composition, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4089, pp. 82–97. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. David, P.C., Ledoux, T.: Safe dynamic reconfigurations of Fractal architectures with FScript. In: Proc. Fractal CBSE Workshop, ECOOP’06. Nantes, France (2006). URL http://www.lina.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/Publications/2006/DL06

    Google Scholar 

  10. Filman, R.E., Elrad, T., Clarke, S., Aks¸it, M. (eds.): Aspect-Oriented Software Development. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fleurey, F., Dehlen, V., Bencomo, N., Morin, B., Jézéquel, J.M.: Modeling and validating dynamic adaptation pp. 97–108 (2009). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-611

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fleurey, F., Solberg, A.: A domain specific modeling language supporting specification, simulation and execution of dynamic adaptive systems. In: A. Schürr, B. Selic (eds.) MoDELS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5795, pp. 606–621. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Floch, J., Hallsteinsen, S., Stav, E., Eliassen, F., Lund, K., Gjorven, E.: Using architecture models for runtime adaptability. IEEE Software 23, 62–70 (2006). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2006.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallsteinsen, S., Hinchey, M., Park, S., Schmid, K.: Dynamic software product lines. Computer 41(4), 93–95 (2008). DOI 10.1109/MC.2008.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keeney, J., Cahill, V.: Chisel: A policy-driven, context-aware, dynamic adaptation framework. Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, IEEE International Workshop on 0, 3 (2003). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/POLICY.2003.1206953

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kephart, J.O., Das, R.: Achieving self-management via utility functions. IEEE Internet Computing 11, 40–48 (2007). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIC.2007.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kishi, T., Noda, N., Katayama, T.: Design verification for product line development. In: J.H. Obbink, K. Pohl (eds.) SPLC, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3714, pp. 150–161. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lapouchnian, A., Liaskos, S., Mylopoulos, J., Yu, Y.: Towards requirements-driven autonomic systems design. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 30(4), 1–7 (2005). URL http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/sigsoft/sigsoft30.html#LapouchnianLMY05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Liaskos, S., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-driven design of autonomic application software. In: CASCON ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, p. 7. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006). DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1188966.1188976

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morin, B.: Survey and evaluation of approaches for runtime variability management. DiVA Project, Deliverable D3.1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morin, B.: Diva run-time reference architecture. DiVA Project, Deliverable D3.2 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morin, B., Barais, O., Nain, G., Jézéquel, J.M.: Taming dynamically adaptive systems using models and aspects. In: ICSE, pp. 122–132. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morin, B., Fleurey, F., Bencomo, N., Jézéquel, J.M., Solberg, A., Dehlen, V., Blair, G.: An aspect-oriented and model-driven approach for managing dynamic variability. In: MoD-ELS ’08: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 782–796. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87875-954

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelly Bencomo Jon Whittle, P.S.A.F., Letier, E.: Requirements reflection: Requirements as runtime entities. ACM/IEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Niu, N., Easterbrook, S.: Extracting and modeling product line functional requirements. In: RE ’08: Proceedings of the 16th International Requirements Engineering Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pohl, K., Metzger, A.: Software product line testing. Commun. ACM 49(12), 78–81 (2006). DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1183236.1183271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rayson, P.: Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Tech. rep., Computing Department, Lancaster University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rouvoy, R.: Requirements of mechanisms and planning algorithms for self-adaptation. MUSIC FP6 Integrated Project D1.1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sampaio, A., Rashid, A., Chitchyan, R., Rayson, P.: Ea-miner: Towards automation in aspectoriented requirements engineering. Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development 3(4), 4–39 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Svahnberg, M., Bosch, J.: Issues concerning variability in software product lines. In: IW-SAPF-3: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Architectures for Product Families, pp. 146–157. Springer-Verlag, London, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tolchinsky, P.: State of the art. ALIVE FP7 Project D2.1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weston, N., Chitchyan, R., Rashid, A.: A framework for constructing semantically composable feature models from natural language requirements. In: SPLC’09: Proceedings of the 13th International Software Product Line Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Whittle, J., Sawyer, P., Bencomo, N., Cheng, B.H., Bruel, J.M.: Relax: Incorporating uncertainty into the specification of self-adaptive systems. Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Conference on 0, 79–88 (2009). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/RE.2009.36

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, Y., Lapouchnian, A., Liaskos, S., Mylopoulos, J., Leite, J.: From goals to high-variability software design. pp. 1–16 (2008). DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-68123-6 1. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68123-6_1

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, J., Cheng, B.H.C.: Specifying adaptation semantics. In: WADS ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Architecting dependable systems, pp. 1–7. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1083217.1083220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenwood, P. et al. (2011). Modelling Service Requirements Variability: The DiVA Way. In: Service Engineering. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0415-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0415-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0414-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0415-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics