Skip to main content

Model Transmutations for Conceptual Design of Technical Systems

  • Conference paper
Development of Knowledge-Based Systems for Engineering

Part of the book series: International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 333))

  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, engineering design is considered from the point of view of modeling i.e. the construction and manipulation of models of (possible) physical realities. Consequently, the design activity has been analysed in terms of patterns of inference called model transmutations. Three categories of transmutations namely, transformations, combinations and retrievals, have been discussed with reference to the Multimodeling approach for representing physical systems. The major goal of the paper is to provide a conceptual framework for analysing existing design systems and for addressing questions concerning their competence such as what types of inference patterns underlie different design strategies e.g. top-down, compositional and analogical design; what kind of design solutions a design system is able to generate from what kind of input specification and prior design knowledge; what is the logical relationship between specification and prior design knowledge. A second goal is to provide a basis for the development of a general theory for task adaptive multistrategy design that aims at combining a range of different design strategies dynamically, in order to take advantage of their respective strengths and address a wider range of practical problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beltrame A. and Toppano E. (1995). Prototype-based conceptual design: the SECS system. In Applications of AI in Engineering X, R.A. Adey, G.Rzevski, and C.Tasso (Eds.), Comp. Mechanics Pub., Boston, pp. 502–512.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borst P., Akkermans H., Pos A., and Top J. (1995). The PhysSys Ontology for Physical Systems. Proc. QR Workshop, Amsterman, the Netherlands, pp. 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bose P. and Rajamoney S.A. (1993). Compositional model-based design. Proc. IJCAI93, Chambery, France, pp. 1445–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrasekaran B. (1990). Design problem solving: a task analysis, AI Magazine, Winter 1990, pp. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chittaro L., Guida G., Tasso C. and Toppano E. (1993). Functional and teleological knowledge in the Multimodeling approach for reasoning about physical systems: a case study in diagnosis. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1718–1751.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falkenhainer B., and Forbus K.D. (1991). Compositional Modeling: Finding the Right Model for the Job, Artificial Intelligence 51, pp. 95–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gero J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. In AI Magazine 11 (4), Winter 1990, pp. 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goel A., and Chandrasekaran B. (1989). Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving. Proc. IJCAI-89, Detroit, MI, USA, pp. 1388–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greiner R. (1988). Learning by understanding analogies. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 81–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwasaki Y., and Levy A.Y. (1994). Automated model selection for simulation. In Proc. AAAI-94, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 1183–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kannapan S.M. (1993). Metrics for functional evaluation of engineered devices. In Proc. of the Reasoning about Function Workshop, July 1993, Washington, D.C., pp. 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michalski R.S. (1991). Inferential learning theory as a basis for multitrategy task-adaptive learning. In Proc. First International Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, November 1991, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michalski R.S., and Hieb, M.R. (1993). Knowledge representation for Multistrategy Task-Adaptive Learning: Dynamic Interlaced Hierarchies. In Proc. Second International Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murthy S. (1988). Qualitative reasoning at multiple resolutions. In Proc. AAAI-88, Saint Paul, MN, USA, pp. 296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nayak P.P. (1994). Causal approximations. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 70, pp. 277–334.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Navinchandra D., Sriram D., and Kedar Cabelli S.T. (1987). Analogy-based engineering problem solving: an overview. In AI in Engineering: Tools and Techniques, Sriram Adey (Eds.), Computational Mechanics Pub., pp. 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neville D., and Weld D.S. (1993). Innovative design as systematic search. In Proc. AAAI-93, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 737–742.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pahl G., and Beitz W. (1984).Engineering Design,The Design Council, London,.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rajamoney S.A. and Lee H. (1991). Prototype-Based reasoning. In Proc. AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riesbeck, C.K. and Schank R.C. (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pulishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Toppano E. (1996). Multistrategy modeling: a case study in design. In Proc. 6th European-Japanese Seminar on Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, Hornbaek, Denmark, pp. 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toppano E. (1996). Rational Model Selection in Large Engineering Knowledge Bases. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal 10, No. 3, pp. 191–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Umeda Y., Takeda H., Tomiyama T., and Yoshikawa H. (1990). Function, Behaviour, and Structure. In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V, vol. 1, J.S.Gero Ed. Springer-Verlag, pp. 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams B C (1990). Interaction-based invention: designing novel devices from first principles. In Expert Systems in Engineering: Principles and Applications. Proc. Int. Workshop, Vienna, Austria, pp. 119–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Wills L.M., and Kolodner J.L. (1994). Towards more creative case-based design systems. In Proc. AAAI-94, Seattle, Washington, pp. 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Toppano, E. (1998). Model Transmutations for Conceptual Design of Technical Systems. In: Tasso, C., de Arantes e Oliveira, E.R. (eds) Development of Knowledge-Based Systems for Engineering. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 333. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2784-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2784-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82916-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2784-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics