Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 76))

Abstract

In recent years, the need for risk measures in highly complex systems, brought a general reconsideration about what features a sound definition of risk should satisfy. Most of the time, the measure of risk must be applied to many different situations, for example the numbers involved are used to compare and to control portfolio investments, as well as trading activities of a department, the exposure to default risk of a class of debts, and so on. It is a natural requirement that those numbers can be compared. But it is necessary that the definition of the risk measure satisfies some mathematical properties, that are given in the form of axioms. This idea forms the core of the theory of coherent risk measures, that was put forward by four scholars in a recent work, [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artzner P., F.Delbaen, J.M. Eber, D. Heath “Coherent measures of risk”, Working Paper, University of Zurich, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gamba A., F.Rossi “Mean-variance-skewness analysis in Portfolio choice and capital markets” Ricerca Operativa, the Journal of the Italian Society of Operations Research, 81, 5–46, (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huber P. “Robust statistics”, Wiley, New York, 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Konno H., H. Yamazaki, “Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market”, Management Science, 37, 519–531, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulvey J.M., H. Vladimirou “Stochastic network programming for financial planning models” Management Science 38 (1992) 1643–1664.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nemhauser G., L. Wolsey “Integer and Combinatorial Optimization”, John Wiley, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Risk Special Supplement, Value at Risk, Risk Magazine, June 1996

    Google Scholar 

  8. RiskMetrics, Technical Document, Morgan Guarantee Trust Company, Global Research, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simaan Y. “Portfolio selection and asset pricing: a three parameter framework” Management Science, 39, 586–577, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benati, S. (2001). Coherent Risk Measures and Linear Programming. In: Ruan, D., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds) Soft Computing for Risk Evaluation and Management. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 76. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1814-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1814-7_21

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00348-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1814-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics