Skip to main content

Hierarchical Structures of Communication in a Network Organization

  • Chapter
Methoden in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre
  • 3111 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

The concept of the network organization is presented in the popular management literature as a counter-model to the bureaucratic organization, and one that would increase the flexibility or adaptive capacity of organizations. In order to increase flexibility and adaptability, emphasis is placed in the network organization on the rapid and broad diffusion of information (Probst/Raub/Romhardt 2006). Free communication flows and shared access to information and knowledge are regarded as essential (Cairncross 2001). Thus, contrary to classic theories of organization (March/Simon 1958; Simon 1945; Weber 1968), information should be available to all members of the organization, irrespective of specialization and/or hierarchical position (Koehler/Dupper/Scaff/Reitberger/ Paxson 1998; Levine/Locke/Searls/Weinberger 1999). The network organization is conceived as a group of linked experts (Sproull/Kiesler 1991). These experts however, are not to be understood as pure specialists. On the contrary, it is argued that there should be an overlap in their respective areas of expertise, in order to promote mutual understanding and a recognition of the need for information and knowledge in order to carry out activities efficiently (Mendelson/Ziegler 1999).

This chapter was originally published in 2008 in the Scandinavian Journal of Management 24(3): 183–198. We like to thank Elsevier for their kind permission to reprint this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahamson, E.: Management fashion. In: Academy of Management Review 21, 1996, S. 254–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, M.K.; Carley, K.M.: Network structure in virtual organizations. In: Organization Science 10,1999, S. 741–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W.: The network organization in theory and practice. In: N. Nohria, & R. Eccles (eds.):Networks and organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.I.: The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V; Mrvar, A.: Pajek: Program for large network analysis. In: Connections 21, 2003, S. 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L.; Luckmann, T.: The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerlein, M.; Johnson, D.: Theories of self-managing work teams. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N.: The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions, and actions in organizations. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, F.: The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E.S.; Cook, J.M.: Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. In: Annual Review of Sociology 25, 1999, S. 441–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G.: A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B.; Joerges, B.: Linguistic artifacts at service of organizational control. In: Gagliardi, P. (ed.): Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1990, S. 339–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B; Joerges, B.: Travel of ideas. In Czarniawska, B.; Sevón,G. (eds): Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1996, S. 13–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmestri, G.; Walgenbach, P.: Mastering techniques or brokering knowledge? Middle managers in Germany, Great Britain and Italy. In: Organization Studies 26, 2005, S. 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A.; Batagelj, V.: Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diestel, R.: Graph Theory. Berlin: Springer 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.; Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: American Sociological Review 48, 1983, S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberwein, W.; Tholen, J.: Managermentalität: Industrielle Unternehmensleitung als Beruf und Politik. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.: Building theories from case study research. In: Academy of Management Review 14, 1989, S. 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flap, H.; Bulder, B.; Volker, B.: Intra-organizational networks and performance. In: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 4, 1998, S. 109–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks I: Conceptual clarification. In: Social Networks 1, 1979, S. 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C.; Roeder, D.; Mulholland, R.R.: Centrality in social networks: Experimental results. In: Social Networks 2, 1980, S. 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, J.; Cailliau, R.: How the web was born: The story of the world wide web. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan, M.J.: Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. In: Information Systems Journal 11, 2001, S. 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, M.: Algorithmic graph theory and perfect graphs. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, C.P.: What do managers do? A critical review of the evidence. In: Journal of Management Studies 23, 1986, S. 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A.: Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. In: Organization 4, 1997, S. 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, S.R.: Relationship of organizational size to complexity and coordination. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 15, 1970, S. 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J.W.; Dupper, T.; Scaff, M.D.; Reitberger, F.; Paxson, P.: The human side of intranets: Content, style & politics. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D.: Constraints on the interactive organization as an ideal type. In: Heckscher, C.C.; Donnellon, A. (eds.): The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994, S. 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D.; Brass, D.J.: Intraorganizational networks: The micro side. In: Wasserman, S.; Galaskiewicz, J. (eds.): Advances in social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994, S. 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C.: European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In: Whitley, R. (ed.): European business systems: Firms and markets in their national contexts. London: Sage 1992, S. 64–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R.; Locke, C.; Searls, D.; Weinberger, D.: The cluetrain manifesto: The end of business as usual. New York: Perseus Books 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: Frontiers in group dynamics. In: Human Relations 1, 1947, S. 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W.; Rockart, J.F.: Computers, Networks, and the Corporation. Scientific American 3, 1991, S. 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W.; Laubacher, R.J.: The dawn of the e-lance economy. In: Harvard Business Review 66, 1998, S. 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G.; Simon, H.A.: Organizations. New York: Wiley 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, D.A.; Davenport, T.H. (eds): Mastering information management. London: Financial Times-Prentice Hall, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, H.; Ziegler, J.: Survival of the smartest – managing information for rapid action and world-class performance. New York: Wiley 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W.; Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83, 1977, S. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W.; Jepperson, R.L.: The actors of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. In: Sociological Theory 18, 2000, S. 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.E.: On the shape of verbal networks in organizations. In: Organization Studies 22, 2001, S. 797–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H.: A theory of the firm’s knowledge-creation dynamics. In: Chandler, A.D. jr; Hagström, P.; Ö. Sölvell, Ö. (eds.): The dynamic firm: The role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions. New York, Oxford University Press 1998, S. 214–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberg, A.; Walgenbach, P.: Modern Talking. Working Paper. University of Mannheim and University of Erfurt, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W.; DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.): The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G.J.B.; Raub, S.; Romhardt, K.: Wissen managen: Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. 5th edition, Wiesbaden: Gabler 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D.S.; Hickson, D.J.; Hinings, C.R.; Truner, C.: Dimensions of organization structure. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 13, 1968, S. 65–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raider, H.; Krackhardt, D.: Intraorganizational networks. In: Baum, J.A.C. (ed.): The Blackwell companion to organizations. Oxford: Blackwell 2002, S. 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M.; Agarwala-Rogers, R.: Communication in organizations. New York: Free Press 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, L.; Morville, P.: Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale web sites. Beijing: O’Reilly 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R.: Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches. In: Scott, W.R.; Meyer, J.W. (eds.): Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994, S. 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R.: Institutions and organizations. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W.: Mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L.; Kiesler, S.: Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.: Managers and their jobs: A study of the similarities and differences in the ways managers spend their time. 2nd edition, London: McGraw-Hill 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.; Barsoux, J.L.; Kieser, A.; Ganter, H.D.; Walgenbach, P.: Managing in Britain and Germany. London: MacMillan 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turau, V.: Algorithmische Graphentheorie. Bonn: Addison-Wesley 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, E.J.: The persistence of bureaucracy: A meta-analysis of Weber’s model of bureaucratic control. In: Organization Studies 26, 2005, S. 569–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: From Max Weber: Essay in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D.: Small pieces loosely joined: A unified theory of the web. New York: Perseus Books 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R.: Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J.: Industrial organization: Theory and Practice. London: Oxford University Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J.: Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K.: The case study crisis: Some answers. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 1981, S. 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G.: The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In: American Sociological Review 42, 1977, S. 726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G.: Organizations as institutions. In: Bacharach, S.B. (ed.): Research in the sociology of organization. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 1983, S. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Andreas Georg Scherer Ina Maria Kaufmann Moritz Patzer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oberg, A., Walgenbach, P. (2009). Hierarchical Structures of Communication in a Network Organization. In: Scherer, A.G., Kaufmann, I.M., Patzer, M. (eds) Methoden in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9473-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics