Skip to main content

Von Klinischen MikroSystemen lernen: Aufbau und Bedeutung einer ergiebigen Informationsumgebung

  • Chapter
Wissensmanagement im Krankenhaus

Auszug

Zwanzig der besten klinischen Einheiten der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika wurden von einer Forschergruppe des Center for Clinical Evaluation Sciences an der Dartmouth Medical School untersucht, um Erfolgseigenschaften dieser klinischen Mikro-systeme für andere Versorgungseinheiten des Gesundheitswesens nutzbar zu machen. Aus der umfangreichen Dokumentation dieser qualitativen Analysen und der Wissenstransferma βnahmen in andere Mikrosysteme wird im Folgenden die Bedeutung eines systematischen und umfassenden Informationsmanagements für klinische Mikrosysteme hervorgehoben.

Der vorliegende Beitrag ist ein bearbeiteter Ausschnitt aus dem Band „Quality by Design: A Clinical Microsystems Approach“ von Eugene C. Nelson, Paul B. Batalden und Marjorie M. Godfrey. sMitautoren des vorliegenden Beitrages zur Informationsumgebung sind neben diesen dreien außerdem: Karen Homa, Christine Campbell, Linda A. Headrick, Thomas P. Huber, Julie J. Mohr und John H. Wasson. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung zur Übersetzung und Veröffentlichung durch: Quality By Design by E. C. Nelson, P. B. Batalden and M. M. Godfrey, San Francisco 2007. Übersetzung aus dem Englischen: Martina Dahlmann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Griffith, J., Alexander, J., and Jelinek, R. Measuring comparative hospital perform-ance. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2002. 47(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Cross-ing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. The strategy focused organization. Boston 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D. P. The balanced scorecard —measures that drive per-formance. Harvard Business Review, 1992. (January-February), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D. P. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 1993. (September/October), 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D. P. Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tan-gible outcomes. Boston 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E., Mohr, J., Batalden, P., and Plume, S. Improving health care, part 1: The clinical value compass. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1996. 22(4), 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E.C., and others. Microsystems in health care: Part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv, 2002. 28(9), 472–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E. C., Batalden, P. B., Ryer, J. C., and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Clinical improvement action guide. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, J. The balanced scorecard: An integrative approach to performance evalua-tion. Healthcare Financial Management, 2001. 55(5), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B. Intelligent enterprise: A knowledge and service based paradigm for in-dustry. New York, Toronto 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother, J., and Shook, J. Learning to see. Brookline, MA 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speroff, T., Miles, P., and Mathews, B. Improving health care, part 5: Applying the dartmouth clincial improvement model to community health. 1998. 24(12), 679–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Splaine, M., and others. Looking at care from the inside out. 1998. 21(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J., and others. Designing an ambulatory clinical practice for outcomes im-provement. 2000. 8(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sabine Bohnet-Joschko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, E.C. (2007). Von Klinischen MikroSystemen lernen: Aufbau und Bedeutung einer ergiebigen Informationsumgebung. In: Bohnet-Joschko, S. (eds) Wissensmanagement im Krankenhaus. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5453-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics