Skip to main content

Web-Based Interactive Walkability Measurement Using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Geospatial Analysis
  • 2788 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of walkability conveys how conducive the built environment is to walking. It has been adopted in many parts of the world to predict people’s physical activity and mode of transportation (Frank and Engelke 2005; Owen et al. 2004; Sallis et al. 2004). Walkability captures the proximity between functionally complementary land uses (live, work, and play) and the directness of a route or the connectivity between destinations (Forsyth and Southworth 2008; Moudon et al. 2006). A walk score is an indicator of how “friendly” an area is for walking. This score is related to the benefits to society in terms of energy savings and improvements in health that a particular environment offers to its residents. For example, a recently developed walk score web site uses Google Maps, specifically Google’s local search application programming interface (API), to find stores, restaurants, bars, parks, and other amenities within walking distance of any address entered. The walk score currently includes addresses in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The algorithm behind this score indicates the walkability of a given route based on the fixed distance from one’s home to nearby amenities. The number of amenities found nearby is the leading predictor of whether people will walk rather than take another travel mode. However, evaluating walkability is challenging because it requires the consideration of many subjective factors (Reid 2008). Moreover, all technical disciplines related to walkability have their own terminology and jargon (Abley 2005).

This chapter has been improved from “Ko Ko Lwin and Yuji Murayama (2011), Modelling of urban green space walkability: eco-friendly walk score calculator. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(5), 408–420.” Copyright (2011), with permission from Elsevier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abley S (2005) Walkability scoping paper. Charted Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Tyrvainen L, Sievanen T, Proebstl U, Simpson M (2007) Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: a European perspective. Living Rev Landsc Res 1:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat C, Handy S, Kockelman K, Mahmassani H, Gopal A, Srour I, Weston L (2002) Development of an urban accessibility index: formulations, aggregation, and application. Report No. FHWA/TX-02-4938-4. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T, Dawes LA (2009) Sustainable urban futures: an ecological approach to sustainable urban development. In: Proceedings of the second infrastructure theme postgraduate conference 2009: rethinking sustainable development planning, infrastructure engineering, design and managing urban infrastructure, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A, Southworth M (2008) Cities afoot: pedestrians, walkability, and urban design. J Urban Des 13:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD, Engelke P (2005) Multiple impacts of the built environment on public health: walkable places and the exposure to air pollution. Int Reg Sci Rev 28:193–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaemi P, Swift J, Sister C, Wilson JP, Wolch J (2009) Design and implementation of a web-based platform to support interactive environmental planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:482–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grahn P, Stigsdotter UA (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban For Urban Green 2:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy S, Niermeier DA (1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ Plann A 29:1175–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B (1999) SimPed: simulating pedestrian crowds in a virtual environment. J Geogr Inform Decis Anal 3:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kweon B-S, Sullivan WC, Wiley AR (1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner city older adults. Environ Behav 30:832–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Hugo G (2007) Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health Place 13:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson DM, Krizek KJ (2005) Access to destinations. Elsevier, Kidlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lwin KK, Murayama Y (2009) A GIS approach to estimation of building population for micro-spatial analysis. Trans GIS 13:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lwin KK, Murayama Y (2010) Development of a GIS tool for dasymetric mapping. Int J Geoinform 6:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Comm Health 60:587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon JR, Miller RW (2003) Identifying high-value green space prior to land development. J Arboricult 29:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin CW, Johnson DB, Schmid TL et al (2006) Operational definitions of a walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights. J Phys Act Health 3:S99–S117

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin C, Johnson DB, Schmid TL et al (2007) Attributes of environments supporting walking. Am J Health Promot 21:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan D, Morrison A, Shearer J (2000) Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 14:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe A, Okunuki K (2001) A computational method for estimating the demand of retail stores on a street network and its implementation in GIS. Trans GIS 5:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 27:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis J, Zimring C, Choi YK (1990) Finding the building in way-finding. Environ Behav 22:555–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie GH (1979) Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environ Plann A 11:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South N, Griffin M (2007) Green exercise in the UK countryside: effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. J Environ Plann Manag 50:211–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall TA, Churchill CJ, Baetz BW (2003) A GIS-based decision support system for neighbourhood greening. Environ Plann B 30:541–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid S (2008) Fit for purpose: evaluating walkability. Eng Sustain 161:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehr D, Laurenz J (2008) Green surfaces in the city context. In: Proceeding of ecocity world summit, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Kraft MK (2004) Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transport Res Pol Pract 38:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman L, Barbara B, Kondo W (1974) Method for evaluating metropolitan accessibility. Transport Res Rec 499:70–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N (2008) Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J Epidemiol Comm Health 62:e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thill J-C (2000) Geographic information systems for transportation in perspective. Transport Res C Emerg Tech 8:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thill J-C (2009) Transportation applications of geographic information systems, manual of geographic information systems. In: Madden M (ed) Manual of geographic information systems. ASPRS, Washington, pp 1035–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill J-C, Kim M (2005) Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility. J Geogr Syst 7:229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachs M, Kumagi TG (1973) Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Soc Econ Plann Sci 7:437–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch J, Wilson JP, Fehrenbach J (2005) Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: an equity-­mapping analysis. Urban Geogr 26:4–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wang H (2006) Planning an ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis. Landsc Urban Plann 78:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ko Ko Lwin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lwin, K.K., Murayama, Y. (2012). Web-Based Interactive Walkability Measurement Using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems. In: Murayama, Y. (eds) Progress in Geospatial Analysis. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54000-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics