Skip to main content

Evolution of Compassion Under Un-Repeated Interaction

  • Chapter
Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress

Abstract

Altruistic behaviors from the haves to the have-nots are often observed in human societies and ecosystems (e.g. assistance among dolphins, and food sharing among vampire bats and among human beings). In this paper, we investigate how the altruistic behaviors, which we call “compassion”, evolve in the situation where pairs of individuals do not repeatedly interact. The results of the computer simulation show the following two results: (1) There exist three types of evolutionary dynamics: (i) the dominance of unconditional non-helpers who never help others; (ii) the coexistence of compassionate individuals who help others who are worse off than themselves and unconditional helpers who always help others; and (iii) the cyclical dominance of unconditional helpers and unconditional non-helpers. (2) Under some parameter settings, cooperative societies where about 60~70% of actions are altruistic are stably realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. 1981. The Evolution of Cooperation. Science. 211, 1390–1396.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, R., &, Richarson, P. J. 1989. The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Social Networks. 11, 213–236.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt, H. & Sigmund, K. 2005. The good, the bad and the discriminator—Errors in direct and indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Connor, R. C. & Norris, K. S. 1982. Are dolphins and whales reciprocal altruists? Amer. Nat. 119, 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dufwenberg, M., Gneezy, U., Guth, W. & van Damme, E. 2001. Direct vs indirect reciprocity: An Experiment. Homo Oecon. 18, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engelmann, D. & Fischbacher, U. 2003. Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game. CERGE-EI working paper No. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greiner, B & Levati, M. V. 2005. Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks: An experimental study. J. Econ. Psychol. 26, 711–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurven, M., Allen-Arave, W., Hill, K. & Hurtado, M. 2000. “It’s a Wonderful Life”: signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. Evolution and Human Behavior. 21, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leimar, O. & Hammerstein, P. 2001. Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maynard Smith, J. & Price, G. 1973. The logic of animal conflicts. Nature. 246, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Bakker, T. C. M. & Krambeck, H. J. 2001. Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2495–2501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. 1998a. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature. 393, 573–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. 2005. Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature. 437, 1291–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohtsuki, H. & Iwasa, Y. 2004. How should we define goodness? —reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 231, 107–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Panchanathan, K. & Boyd, R. 2003. A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 224, 115–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki, S. & Akiyama, E. 2005. Reputation and the evolution of cooperation in sizable groups. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272, 1373–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trivers, R. 1985. Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wedekind, C. & Milinski, M. 2000. Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science. 288, 850–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkinson, G. S. 1984. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature 308, 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suzuki, S., Akiyama, E. (2007). Evolution of Compassion Under Un-Repeated Interaction. In: Takahashi, S., Sallach, D., Rouchier, J. (eds) Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73167-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73167-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-73150-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-73167-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics