Skip to main content

Moral Responsibility and Social Fiction

  • Chapter
Meaning in Action
  • 1689 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter proposes to analyze the nature of moral responsibility. It does not explore how moral responsibility is practiced in specific cultural communities, in certain periods of time, or what kind of cognitive biases are observed according to social circumstances (Heider 1958; Weiner 1995). My concern is neither how human beings learn the attribution pattern of responsibility (Piaget 1932; Kohlberg 1981), nor what is the best conceptualization of moral responsibility. The first approach, typically socio-psychological, addresses biases of accounting for a criminal deed, but does not ask what moral responsibility is; the second, developmental, studies children’s evolution in causal attribution of responsibility, but does not determine what moral responsibility is; the third, philosophical, contends that moral responsibility can and should be founded transcendently out of socio-historical context. On the contrary, I affirm that moral responsibility is a social phenomenon, and that it is impossible to found or justify any “truth” independently of social contexts, because truth is a synonym of collective representation. I do not consider what one ought to be or to do, but what one is, and what one does effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arendt H (1963) Eichmann in jerusalem. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (1989) Modernity and the holocaust. Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvois JL, Joule RV (1981) Obedience and ideologies (Soumission et idéologies). PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem DJ (1972) Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L (Ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 61–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass T (2002) Perpetrator behavior as destructive obedience. In: Newman LS, Erber R (Eds) Understanding genocide. The social psychology of the holocaust. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning CR (1992) Ordinary men. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1991) Consciousness explained. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E (1996) Determination of moral fact (Détermination du fait moral). In Sociology and philosophy (Sociologie et philosophie). PUF, Paris, pp 49–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DM, Franks P, Fridgood D, Lobban G, Mackay HCG (1969) An experiment on obedience. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnet P (1928) The responsibility. Sociological study (La Responsabilité. Étude de sociologie). Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1957) Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham FD, Jaspars JM (1980) Attribution of responsibility: from man the scientist to man as lawyer. In: Berkowitz L (Ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga MS (1985) The social brain. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard R (1978) Things hidden since the foundation of the world (Des choses cachées depuis la fondation du monde). Grasset, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen DJ (1996) Hitler’s willing executioners. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA, Honoré T (1959) Causation in the law. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg R (1961) The destruction of the European Jews. Yale University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1957) What is justice? Justice, law and politics in the mirrorbook of science. University of California Press, Berkeley CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg K (1981) The philosophy of moral development. Harper and Row, San Francisco CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozakai T (2000) Strangers, identity (L’Étranger, l’identité). Payot et Rivages, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda W (1992) Action and norm (Kôi to kihan). Keisô-shobô, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer EJ (1975) The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 32:311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner MJ, Simmons CH (1966) Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: compassion or rejection? J Pers Soc Psychol 4:203–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyens JP (1983) Are we all psychologists? (Sommes-nous tous des psychologues?) Pierre Mardaga, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet B (2004) Mind time. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantell DM (1971) The potential for violence in Germany. J Soc Issues 27:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1965) Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Hum Relat 18:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Pinter and Martin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AG, Buddle AM, Kretschmar J (2002) Explaining the holocaust. Does social psychology exonerate the perpetrators? In: Newman LS, Erber R (Eds) Understanding genocide. The social psychology of the holocaust. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 301–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda FSB, Caballero RB, Gomez MNG, Zamorano MAM (1981) Obediencia a la autoridad, Pisquis, 2:212–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima Y (1999) Time and freedom (Jikan to jiyû). Kôdan-sha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 84:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal B (1977) Pensees (Pensées). Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1932) The moral judgment of the child (Le jugement moral chez l’enfant). PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum R (1999) Explaining hitler. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross L (1977) The Intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In: Berkowitz L (Ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp 173–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman AL (2000) The role of the obedience experiments on Holocaust studies. In: Blass T (Ed) Obedience to authority. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz G (1985) Experimental examination of the relations between personality characteristics and the readiness for destructive obedience towards authority (Experimentelle Überprüfung des Zusammenhangs zwischen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen und der Bereitschaft zum destruktiven Gehorsam gegenüber Autoritäten). Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 32:160–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanab ME, Yahya KA (1977) A behavioral study of obedience in children. J Pers Soc Psychol 35:530–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanab ME, Yahya KA (1978) A cross-cultural study of obedience. Bull Psychon Soc 11:267–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson G (2003) The impossibility of moral responsibility. In: Watson G (Ed) Free will. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 212–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B (1995) Judgments of responsibility. Guildford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1921) Tractatus logico-philosophicus, followed by Philosophical Investigations (Tractatus logico-philosophicus, suivi de investigations philosophiques). Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kozakai, T. (2008). Moral Responsibility and Social Fiction. In: Sugiman, T., Gergen, K.J., Wagner, W., Yamada, Y. (eds) Meaning in Action. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics