Abstract
The author, in this chapter, highlights the episode when Gandhi decided to live with a Muslim league leader post the communal riots of Calcutta in 1946, in order to bring about lasting peace. However, such an intervention may not always be possible in a society devoid of a Mahatma, nonetheless peace can be brought about by establishing a truth commission. According to the author, basic procedural justice makes possible a minimally decent life, which has a value independent of any wider conception of the good. In order to transform a barbaric society into a decent society, it is important to transit through certain stages. First, a highly frail and temporary truce prevails that may easily collapse generating a fresh burst of violence. With the help from appropriate institutions, such as the truth commissions, we move to stage two, to a minimally decent society. A sufficiently prolonged period of minimal decency may eventually create facilitating conditions for stage three, for forgiveness and reconciliation, and therefore, to a fully decent society. In order to break the cycle of revenge, former victims must be inducted into a system of basic procedural justice equipped with a mechanism of arbitration, Truth commission can help in the recovery of the submerged voice of the victim. It is important also for the brutalities to be spoken about rather than expect victims to forgive and forget since only an appropriate engagement with the past makes for a livable common future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bhalla, A. (1994). Stories about partition of India. New Delhi: Indus.
Bhargava, R. (1992). Individualism in social science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dalton, D. (1970). Gandhi during partition: A case study in the nature of Satyagraha. In C.H. Phillips & Mary Wainright (Eds.), The partition of India: policies and perspectives 1935–1947. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Das, V. (1990). Our work to cry: Your work to listen. In V. Das (Ed.), Mirrors of violence. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Gandhi, M. K. (1982). Collected works of Mahatma Gandhi (Vol. CXXXVI). New Delhi: Publications Division.
Hampshire, S. (1989). Innocence and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, D. (1994). Political writings. Cambridge/Indianapolis: Hackett.
Ignatieff, M. (1994). Blood and belonging. London: Vintage.
Mackie, J. (1985). Persons and values. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mamdani, M. (1996). Reconciliation without Justice. South African Review of Books CIV.
May, L. (1992). Sharing responsibility. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Murphy, J., & Hampton, J. (1990). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenburg, T. (1995). The haunted land. London: Vintage.
Waldron, J. (1992). Superseding historic injustice. Ethics, 103:4–28.
Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. London and Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Wolin, S. (1989). The presence of the past. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhargava, R. (2016). Between Revenge and Reconciliation: The Significance of Truth Commissions. In: Tripathi, R., Singh, P. (eds) Perspectives on Violence and Othering in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2613-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2613-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2612-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2613-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)