Abstract
The performance of a diagnostic examination1 can be basically considered as its degree of accuracy, namely its ability to find the subjects affected with a given disease as positive and the subjects not affected with same disease as negative. The indices which in different ways measure this performance are defined measures of diagnostic performance and the studies aimed at measuring the diagnostic performance of an examination or, more often, at comparing the diagnostic performance of two or more examinations, are defined studies of diagnostic performance.
For the sake of clarity, we will avoid naming a radiologic examination as a test as much as possible. Although this term is entirely correct, we prefer to use the term exam or examination in order to avoid confusion with statistical tests. Exceptions will be pretest probability and post-test probability for a given disease which we will approach with Bayes’ theorem to represent the ability of each diagnostic test to increase or decrease the probability of a given disease in the subjects who underwent the examination with a positive or a negative result, respectively. Other rare exceptions will be evident from the context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American College of Radiology (2003) ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): breast imaging atlas. Reston
Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4 — appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242:342–354
Fagan TJ (1975) Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257
Malone DE, Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: step 5 (evaluate)-caveats and common questions. Radiology 243:319–328
Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathology examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1149–1157
Sobue T, Moriyama N, Kaneko M et al (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. J Clin Oncol 20:911–920
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Diagnostic Performance. In: Biostatistics for Radiologists. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1133-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1133-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1132-8
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1133-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)