Skip to main content

Errors in Radiology: Definition and Classification

  • Chapter
Errors in Radiology

Abstract

As indicated by the title of the landmark report of the Institute of Medicine, “To Err is Human” mistakes are part of the human condition [1]. They cannot be prevented by trying harder. At best, systematic changes are needed to prevent physician’s from doing the wrong thing while making it more likelyl that they will do the right thing. This is accomplished by hardwiring functions into medical systems and providing information at the point of care [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (editors) (1999) To err is human: building a safer healthsystem. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gluck PA (2007) Patient safety in women’s health care: a framework for progress. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:525–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fileni A, Magnavita N, Mirk P et al (2010) Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in Italy: an observational study over a 14-year period. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1040–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinto A, Brunese L (2010) Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol 2:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlin L (1986) Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11.5-year perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147:1291–1298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spring DB, Tennenhouse DJ (1986) Radiology malpractice lawsuits: California jury verdicts. Radiology 159:811–814

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ et al (2006) Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 296:1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N et al (1991) The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 324:377–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW et al (1995) The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 163:458–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grober ED, Bohnen JMA (2005) Defining medical error. Can J Surg 48:39–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson RM, Harrison GB, Gibberd RW et al (1999) An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 170:411–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR et al (1999) Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Medical Care 38:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Leape L (1994) Error in medicine. JAMA 272:1851–1857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reason JT (2001) Understanding adverse events: the human factor. In: Vincent C (editor). Clinical risk management: enhancing patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group, London pp 9–30

    Google Scholar 

  18. Siewert B, Sosna J, McNamara A et al (2008) Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance. RadioGraphics 28:623–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berlin L (2007) Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D (1978) Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 13:175–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Samuel S, Kundel HL, Nodine CF et al (1995) Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology 194:895–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Woodring JH (1990) Pitfalls in the radiologic diagnosis of lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:1165–1175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yerushalmy J (1969) The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows. Radiol Clin North Am 7:381–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pitman AG (2006) Perceptual error and the culture of open disclosure in Australian radiology. Australas Radiol 50:206–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berlin L (2000) Malpractice issues in radiology. Alliterative errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:925–931

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pinto A, Acampora C, Pinto F et al (2011) Learning from diagnostic errors: a good way to improve education in radiology. Eur J Radiol 78:372–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. American College of Radiology (2005) ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. In: 2005 Practice guideline & technical standards. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA pp 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berlin L (2005) Errors of omission. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1416–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harrigal CL, Erly WK (2007) On-call radiology: community standards and current trends. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 28:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pinto, A., Scuderi, M.G., Daniele, S. (2012). Errors in Radiology: Definition and Classification. In: Romano, L., Pinto, A. (eds) Errors in Radiology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2338-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2339-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics