Skip to main content

Riassunto

Il 30 ottobre 1935, presso il Wright Air Field a Dayton, Ohio, l’US Army Air Corps organizzò una competizione tra produttori di velivoli per la fornitura di un bombardiere a lungo raggio di nuova generazione. Già nelle valutazioni iniziali, la Boeing Corporation, con il nuovo Model 299 in lega d’alluminio, surclassava i disegni della concorrenza.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Schamel J (2011) How the Pilot’s checklist came about. Flight Service History. http://www.atchistory.org/History/checklst.htm

  2. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17:216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126:66–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD (2002) Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 14:269–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Welch SJ (2007) From aviation to anesthesia: creating a culture of safety. EMN 19:32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leonard M (2004) Achieving safe and reliable healthcare. Health Administration Press. Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Kitz RJ (1984) An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology 60:34–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hart EM, Owen H (2005) Errors and omissions in anesthesia: a pilot study using a pilot’s checklist. Anesth Analg 101:246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lingard L, Espin S, Rubin B et al (2005) Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care 14:340–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. World Alliance for Patient Safety (2008) WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/ss_checklist/en

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patient Safety Alert UPDATE (2009) WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. National Patient Safety Agency. NPSA/2009/PSA002/U1 http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/collections/10-for-2010/five-steps-to-safer-surgery/?entryid45=59860

  14. Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali (2009) Manuale per la sicurezza in sala operatoria: Raccomandazioni e checklist. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1119_allegato.pdf

  15. http://www.siaarti.it/documenti/documenti.php?page=documenti

  16. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/index.html

  17. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/patient-safety-videos/how-to-do-the-who-surgical-safety-checklist

  18. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM et al (2007) Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 204:533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffen FD, Stephens LS, Alexander JB et al (2007) The American College of Surgeons’ closed claims study: new insights for improving care. J Am Coll Surg 204:561–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM et al (2010) Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ziewacz JE, Arriaga AF, Bader AM et al (2011) Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing. J Am Coll Surg 213:212–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parotto, M., La Guardia, P., Ori, C. (2012). Checklist. In: Gullo, A., Murabito, P. (eds) Governo clinico e medicina perioperatoria. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2793-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2793-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2792-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2793-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics