Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology ((VERT))

  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

The discussion in the previous chapter of the evidence for the early use of fire has demonstrated the complexities involved in identifying the early stages of human control over fire and emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach to their study. The presence of burned flint items at the site of GBY provides a unique opportunity to investigate this pressing issue with a different methodological approach. This methodology draws on a variety of ethnographic, archaeological, and ethnoarchaeological studies, which generally suggest that small lithic products can be used as spatial indicators for a variety of activities, including the use of fire in the form of hearths. The theoretical foundations of this approach are presented in this chapter, which integrates the different components of the research program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A thorough discussion of fire ecology, and specifically of the probability of natural fire at GBY, is included in Chapter 4.

  2. 2.

    The use of discoloration of flint as a distinctive feature for the identification of burning is not a reliable measure for the flints of GBY; embedded within the waterlogged sediments, the majority of flint items are darkly patinated.

  3. 3.

    As previously noted, a thorough discussion of fire ecology, and specifically of the probability of natural fire at GBY, is included in Chapter 4.

  4. 4.

    Layers I-4 and II-5, revealed during the first season of excavations at the site, were partially wet-sieved; sampling included a single full bucket from each sub-square of a given depth unit of excavation.

  5. 5.

    The principles of the TL method are discussed in Section 1.2.

  6. 6.

    See: http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/about/desktop_gis.html

  7. 7.

    The kernel function is based on the quadratic kernel function described in Silverman 1986: 76, Equation 4.5.

References

  • Alperson-Afil N, Hovers E. Differential use of space in the Neandertal site of Amud Cave, Israel. Eurasian Prehist. 2005;3(1):3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alperson-Afil N, Richter D, Goren-Inbar N. Phantom hearths and the use of fire at Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. PaleoAnthropol. 2007;1:1–15. http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/content/PA20070001.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazi S, Motro U, Goren-Inbar N, Biton R, Rabinovich R. New morphometric parameters for assessment of body size in the fossil freshwater crab assemblage from the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32:675–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin LA, Bergman CA, Roberts MB, Wilhelmsen KH. Archaeology of excavated areas. In: Roberts MB, Parfitt SA, editors. Boxgrove: a Middle Pleistocene hominid site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex. London: English Heritage; 1999. p. 312–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellomo RV, Harris JWK. Preliminary report of actualistic studies of fire within Virunga National Park, Zaire: towards an understanding of archaeological occurrences. In: Boaz NT, editor. Evolution of environments and Hominidae in the African Western Rift Valley. Martinsville: Virginia Museum of Natural History; 1990. p. 317–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford LR. Dimensional analysis of behavior and site structure: learning from an Eskimo hunting stand. Am Antiquity. 1978; 43:330–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford LR. In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. London: Thames & Hudson; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AS, Yellen JE. The preservation of activity areas in the archaeological record: ethnoarchaeological and archaeological work in Northwest Ngamiland, Botswana. In: Kent S, editor. Method and theory for activity area research: an ethnoarchaeological approach. New York: Columbia University Press; 1987. p. 63–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canti MG, Linford N. The effects of fire on archaeological soils and sediments: temperture and colour relationships. Proc Prehist Soc. 2000;66:385–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JE. Flintknapping and debitage disposal among the Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. In: Staski E, Sutro LD, editors. The ethnoarchaeology of refuse disposal. Arizona: Arizona State University; 1991. p. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree DE, Butler BR. Notes on experiments in flint knapping I: heat treatments of silica minerals. Tebiwa. 1964;7(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer WR. The archaeological record as preserved death assemblage. In: Moore JA, Keene AS, editors. Archaeological hammers and. theories. New York: Academic; 1983. p. 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell RC, Stein JK. Theoretical issues in the interpretation of microartifacts. Geoarchaeology. 1989;4:31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feibel CS. Archaeological sediments in lake margin environments. In: Stein JK, Farrand WR, editors. Sediments in archaeological contexts. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2001. p. 127–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fladmark KR. Microdebitage analysis: initial considerations. J Archaeol Sci. 1982;9:205–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanidou N. Patterns in caves: foragers, horticulturists, and the use of space. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2000;19:243–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilead I. A Middle Paleolithic open-air site near Tell Far‘a, Western Negev: preliminary report. Isr Expl J. 1980;30:52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilead I, Grigson C. Far‘a II: a Middle Paleolithic open-air site in the Northern Negev, Israel. Proc Prehist Soc. 1984;50:71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G. Invisible handaxes and visible Acheulian biface technology at Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. In: Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G, editors. Axe age: Acheulian tool-making from quarry to discard. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2006. p. 111–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar N, Lister A, Werker E, Chech M. A butchered elephant skull and associated artifacts from the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. Paléorient. 1994;20(1):99–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman SJ. The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics. 1973;29:205–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietala H. Boker Tachtit: spatial distributions. In: Marks AE, editor. Prehistory and paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel. Dallas: Southern Methodist University; 1983. p. 191–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull KL. Identification of cultural site formation processes through microdebitage analysis. Am Antiquity. 1987;52:772–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac GL. The archaeology of human origins: studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa: 1971–1981. In: Wendorf F, Close AE, editors. Advances in world archaeology, vol. 3. New York: Academic; 1984. p. 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julig PJ, Long DGF, Schroeder B, Rink WJ, Richter D, Schwarcz HP. Geoarchaeology and new research at Jerf al-Ajla Cave, Syria. Geoarchaeology. 1999;14:821–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leesch D, Bullinger J, Cattin M-I, Müller W, Plumettaz N. Hearths and hearth-related activities in Magdalenian open-air sites: the case studies of Champréveyres and Monruz (Switzerland) and their relevance to an understanding of Upper Paleolithic site structure. Paper presented at the Magdalenian in Central Europe: New Finds and Concepts. 20–23 September 2005, Poland: Rzeszów; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallol C, Marlowe FW, Wood BM, Porter CC. Earth, wind, and fire: ethnoarchaeological signals of Hadza fires. J Archaeol Sci. 2007;34:2035–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe D, Heath KM. Microrefuse and site structure: the hearths and floors of the Heartbreak Hotel. Am Antiquity. 1990;55:781–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel D. Indoor/outdoor flint knapping and minute debitage remains: the evidence from the Ohalo II submerged camp (19.5 KY, Jordan Valley). Lithic Technol. 2001;26:118–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell JF. Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications. Am Antiquity. 1987;52:74–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy BA. Fractures for the archaeologist. In: Swanson E, editor. Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. Paris: Mouton; 1975. p. 133–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy BA, Brooks HK. Thermal alteration of silica minerals: an archeological approach. Science. 1971;173:322–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovich R, Gaudzinski-Windheuser S, Goren-Inbar N. Systematic butchering of fallow deer (Dama) at the Early Middle Pleistocene Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov (Israel). J Hum Evol. 2008;54:134–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiegl S, Goldberg P, Bar-Yosef O, Weiner S. Ash deposits in Hayonim and Kebara Caves, Israel: macroscopic, microscopic and mineralogical observations, and their archaeological implications. J Archaeol Sci. 1996;23:763–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simek JF. Integrating pattern and context in spatial archaeology. J Archaeol Sci. 1984;11:405–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms SR. The archaeological structure of a Bedouin camp. J Archaeol Sci. 1988;15:197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurling B, Hayden B. Ethnoarchaeology and intrasite spatial analysis: A case study from the Australian Western desert. In: Hietala HJ, editor. Intrasite spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 224–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapert D. Middle Palaeolithic dwellings: fact or fiction? Some applications of the ring and sector method. Palaeohistoria. 1990;32:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein JK, Teltser PA. Size distributions of artifact classes: combining macro-and-micro-fractions. Geoarchaeology. 1989;4:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson MG. Beyond the formation of hearth-associated artifact assemblages. In: Kroll EM, Price TD, editors. The Interpretation. of archaeological spatial patterning. New York: Plenum; 1991. p. 269–99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stiner MC, Kuhn SL, Weiner S, Bar-Yosef O. Differential Burning.recrystallization, and fragmentation of archaeological bone. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22:223–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED. Microdebitage and archaeological activity analysis. Archaeology. 1987;40(4):58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero M, Pastó I. The definition of spatial units in Middle Palaeolithic sites: the hearth-related assemblages. J Archaeol Sci. 2001;28:1209–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa P, Bon F, Castel J-C. Fuel, fire and fireplaces in the Paleolithic of Western Europe. Rev Archaeol. 2002;23(1):33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellen JE. Archaeological approaches to the present: models for reconstructing the past. New York: Academic; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nira Alperson-Afil .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alperson-Afil, N., Goren-Inbar, N. (2010). Framework of Research. In: The Acheulian Site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov Volume II. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3765-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics