Skip to main content

Advance Directives: Balancing Patient’s Self-Determination with Professional Paternalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics in Psychiatry

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 45))

Abstract

Anticipatory planning for psychiatric care and treatment differs from routine end-of-life care planning. Validity of wishes and directives is difficult to establish and to interpret and may change due to the course of the disease. Models of advance care documents include Ulysses Contracts, and community-based or provider-based standards, use of the concept of Precedent Autonomy, and forms of proxy consent. Preparing care documents is a methodological and communicative challenge within an environment of professional paternalism. Narrative forms to elicit patient’s preferences and negotiated contracts are the methods of choice. While more detailed empirical and conceptual research is needed, the classical conflict in professional responsibility to balance the respect for patient’s self-determination with paternalism within a paternalistic model most likely will remain, calling for practical and compassionate reasoning and care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ADRA [Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association Inc] (1994) Guidelines for the treatment of patients with advanced dementia. ADRDA, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JM, Garner HC, Stuart S et al (2003) The development of potential models of advance directives in mental health care. J Ment Health 12:575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borbe R, Jaeger S, Steinert T (2009) Behandlungsvereinbarung in der Psychiatrie. Joint Crisis Plans in Psychiatry. Psychiat Prax 36:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock D (1993) A proposal for the use of advance directives in the treatment of incompetent mentally ill persons. Bioethics 7:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J (2002) The concept of precedent autonomy. Bioethics 16:114–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz A, Poerksen N (1998) Verhandeln als Leitlinie psychiatrischen Handelns. In: A Dietz, N Poerksen, W Voelzke (Hrsg) Behandlungsvereinbarungen. Psychiatrie, Bonn, 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresser R (1982) Ulysses and the psychiatrists. Civil Lib Law Rev 16:833–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Gremmen I, Widdershoven G, Beekman ZR, Sevenhuijsen S (2008) Ulysses arrangements in psychiatriy. A matter of good care? J Med Ethics 34:77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundstein-Amado R (1992) Value inquiry: a method of eliciting advance health care directives. Humane Med 8:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare R (1981) The philosophical basis of psychiatric ethics. In: Bloch S, Chodoff P (eds) Psychiatric ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M et al (2009) Views of patients and providers on joint crisis plans: single blind randomized trial. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 44:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson C, Swanson JW, Szmukler G, Thornicroft G, Zinkler M (2008) A typology of advance statements in mental health care. Psychiatr Serv 59:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jens W, Kueng H (2009) Menschenwuerdig sterben. Ein Plaedoyer fuer Selbstverantwortung. Piper Erweiterte und aktualisierte Ausgabe, Muenchen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielstein R, Sass HM (1993) Using stories to assess values and establish medical directives. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 3:303–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kielstein R, Sass HM (1997) Die Wertanamnese: ein narrativer Ansatz zur Erstellung und Interpretation von Betreuungsverfügungen. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 147(6):125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielstein R, Sass HM (2007) Die persoenliche Patientenverfuegung. Ein Arbeitsbuch zur Vorbereitung mit Bausteinen und Modellen. Muenster: Lit, 5. Aufl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauter H, Helmchen H (2006) Vorausverfügter Behandlungsverzicht bei Verlust der Selbstbestimmbarkeit infolge persistierender Hirnerkrankung. Nervenarzt 77(9):1031–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loetjoenen S (2006) Medical research on patients with dementia. The role of advance directives in European legal instruments. Eur J Health Law 13(3):235–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn J, Teno J, Dresser R, Brock D, Lindemann H, Lindemann N, Kielstein R, Fukuchi Y, Lu D, Itakura H (1999) Dementia and advance-care planning. Perspectives from three countries on ethics and epidemiology. J Clin Ethics 10:273–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner R (2000) Verbindlichkeit und notwendiger Inhalt von Vorsorgevollmachten und Patientenverfugungen in de Psychiatrie. Recht und Psychiatrie 18(4):161–163

    Google Scholar 

  • May A (2001) Autonomie und Fremdbestimmung bei medizinischen Entscheidungen für Nichteinwilligungsfähige. Lit, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Meininger HP (2000) Life stories: narratives and professional practice. Ethics Intellect Disabil 5(2):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordacci R, Sobel R (1998) Health, a comprehensive concept. Hastings Cent Rep 28(1):34–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen DP (1998) Toward an ethical standard of coerced mental health treatment: least restrictive or most therapeutic? J Clin Ethics 9:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Quante M (1999) Precendent autonomy and personal identity. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 9:365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (1988) Time and narrative. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabat SR (1998) Voices of Alzheimer’s disease sufferers: a call for treatment based on personhood. J Clin Ethics 9:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass HM (1991) Differentialethik und Psychiatrie. In: Poeldinger W, Wagner W (eds) Ethik in der Psychiatrie. Springer, Berlin, 95–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sass HM (2001) Balancing autonomy with paternalism for psychiatric patients. Formos J Med Humanit 2(1/2):18–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass HM (2003) Advance directives of psychiatric patients? Balancing paternalism and autonomy. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 17/18:380–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sass HM, Veatch RM, Kimura R (eds) (1998) Advance directives and surrogate decision making in health care. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J (1997) The trouble with do-gooders. The example of suicide. J Med Ethics 23:108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J, Dickenson D (1998) The time frame of preferences, dispositions, and the validity of Advance Directives for the mentally ill. Philos Psychiatr Psychol 5(3):225–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal AR, Weisheit C, Miura Y, Butzlaff M, Kielstein R, Taguchi Y (1996) Advance directives and withdrawl of dialysis in the United States, Germany, and Japan. JAMA 276:1652–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellecy R (2003) Reviving ulysses contract. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 13:373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srebnik DS, Kim SY (2006) Competency for creating, use, and revocation of psychiatric advance directives. J Am Psychiatry Law 34:501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB et al (2008) Psychiatric advance directives and reduction of coercive crisis intervention. J Ment Health 17:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson J, Swartz M, Ferron J, Elbogen E, van Dorn R (2006a) Psychiatric advance directives among public health consumers in five US cities: prevalence, demand, and correlates. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson JW, Van McCrary S, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB et al (2006b) Superseding psychiatric advance directives. Ethical and legal considerations. J Am Psychiatry Law 34:385–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz T (2007) You don’t in psychiatry. Br Med J 35:900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voelzke W (1998) Sinn und Zweck, Chancen der Behandlungsvereinbarung. In: A Dietz, N Poerksen, W Voelzke (eds) Behandlungsvereinbarungen. Psychiatrie, Bonn, 16–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann J (2001) Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Med Health Care Philos 4:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Margaret Urban (1993) Keeping moral space open. Hastings Cent Rep 23(2):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder CM, Elbogen EB, Swartz MS, Van Dorn RA (2007) Effects of patient’s reasons for refusing treatment on implementing psychiatric Advance Directives. Psychiatr Serv 58(10):1348–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Martin Sass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sass, HM., May, A.T. (2010). Advance Directives: Balancing Patient’s Self-Determination with Professional Paternalism. In: Helmchen, H., Sartorius, N. (eds) Ethics in Psychiatry. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8721-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8721-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8720-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8721-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics