Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metropolitan Development of Nanotechnology: Concentration or Dispersion?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society ((YNTS,volume 2))

Abstract

In this chapter, Jan Youtie and Philip Shapira leave the world of economic theory and plunge into the economic realities of the regional distribution of nanotechnology activities today in the United States. Some emerging technologies in the past have developed in specific locations, with the best known being Silicon Valley in California, Research Triangle Park in North Carolina, and Route 128 near Boston. Such “technology districts” can be a great boon for local economies, but they inherently open up inequalities with other areas. Youtie and Shapira explore how current nanotechnology research is distributed among regions in the United States.

Originally presented at the Workshop on Nanotechnology, Equity, and Equality at Arizona State University on November 21, 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, Anthony. 1970. On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi, Birgit, and T. Pradeep. 2006. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology in developing countries. Current Science 90(5): 645–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Maryann P., and Richard Florida. 1994. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84(2): 210–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ribas, Andrea. 2008. Analysis of small businesses international patent strategies: Preliminary results. Presented at The Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Tempe, Arizona, January 14–16, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ribas, Andrea, and Philip Shapira. 2009. Technological diversity, scientific excellence and the location of inventive activities abroad: The case of nanotechnology. Journal of Technology Transfer 34(3): 286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard. 2002. The rise of the creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard. 2005. The world is spiky. The Atlantic Monthly October: 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Gerhard and Philip Shapira, eds. 2005. Rethinking regional innovation and change. Path dependency or regional breakthrough? Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchair, Sonia. 2007. Representation and reward in high technology industries and occupations: The influence of race and ethnicity. Doctoral Dissertation, Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Stuart, and Maurizio Iacopetta. 2008. Nanotechnology and the emergence of a general purpose technology. Paper presented at the NBER Conference on Emerging Industries: Nanotechnology and NanoIndicators, May 1–2, 2008, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Zan, Hsinchun Chen, Lijun Yan and Mihail C. Roco. 2005. Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): National Science Foundation funding and its impact on patents. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 343–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Zan, Hsinchun Chen, Alan Yip, Gavin Ng, Fei Guo, Zhi-Kai Chen and Mihail C. Roco. 2003. Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 5: 333–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Adam, Manuel Trajtenberg, and Rebecca Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 557–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Luciano, and Philip Shapira. 2009. Developing nanotechnology in Latin America. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, Ronald N., Jesse A. Stump, Dustin Johnson, James S. Murday, Clifford G.Y. Lau and William M. Tolles. 2006. The structure and infrastructure of global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8: 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, Philippe. 2008. Positioning the work done on nano S&T associated to PRIME. Paper presented at Nanotechnology Science Mapping and Innovation Trajectories, Manchester, UK, September 9, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein, Bruce. 2005. What counts as a ‘social and ethical issue’ in nanotechnology? HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 11(1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux, 2005. Benchmarking U.S. states for economic development from nanotechnology. New York, NY: Lux Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux, 2007. The nanotech report. Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, 5th ed. New York, NY: Lux Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, Edward J. 1997. Technology and Economic Development, 2nd ed. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangematin, Vincent. 2006. Emergence of science districts and divergent technology: The case of nanotechnologies. Paper presented at workshop on Mapping the Emergence of Nanotechnologies and Understanding the Engine of Growth and Development, Grenoble, France, March 1–3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 1890. Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. 2006. Update of statistical area definitions and guidance on their uses (OMB Bulletin No. 07–01). Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Alan L., and Jan Youtie. 2008. How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11, 1023–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Alan L., Jan Youtie, Philip Shapira, and Dave Schoeneck. 2008. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10: 715–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. 2009. Consumer products, Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.nanotechproject.org/topics/consumer_products/. (accessed December 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafols, Ismael, and Martin Meyer. 2009. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 81 (2), Online First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, Mihail C. 2004. Nanoscale science and engineering: Unifying and transforming tools. AIChE Journal 50(5): 890–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, Frank, and Marie Thursby. 2007. The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Research Policy 36(6): 832–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Annalee. 1994. Regional advantage. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, Joachim. 2004, Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59: 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Philip, and Jan Youtie. 2008. Emergence of nanodistricts in the United States: Path dependency or new opportunities? Economic Development Quarterly 22(3): 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Philip, Jan Youtie, and Stephen Carley. 2009. Prototypes of emerging nanodistricts in the US and Europe. Les Annales d’Economie et de Statistique. In Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Philip, Jan Youtie, and Sushanta Mohapatra. 2003. Linking research production and development outcomes at the regional level. Research Evaluation, 12(1): 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Philip, and Jue Wang. 2009. From lab to market: Strategies and issues in the commercialization of nanotechnology in China. Journal of Asian Business Management 8(4): 461–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, Paul. 1992. Politics and technology. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Li, and Philip Shapira. 2007. Networks of research collaboration in China: Evidence from nanotechnology publication activities, 1990–2006. Working Paper. Program on Nanotechnology Research and Innovations Assessment, Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, Jan, Maurizio Iacopetta, and Stuart Graham. 2008. Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer 32 (6): 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, Jan, Philip Shapira, and Alan Porter. 2008. Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. Journal of Nanotechnology Research, 10(6): 981–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jue. 2007. Resource spillover from academia to high tech industry: Evidence from New nanotechnology-based firms in the U.S. Doctoral Dissertation, Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Lynne G., and Michael R. Darby. 2005. Socio-economic impact of nanoscale science: Initial results and nanobank, (Working Paper 11181). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Lynne, Michael Darby, Jonathan Furner, Robert Lieu, and Hongyan Ma. 2007. Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy 36: 850–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study uses data from the large-scale global nanotechnology publication and patent datasets developed by the group on Nanotechnology Research and Innovation Systems at Georgia Institute of Technology—a component of the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (CNS-ASU). Support for the research was provided through CNS-ASU with sponsorship from the National Science Foundation (Award No. 0531194). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Enterprise Innovation Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Jan Youtie

  2. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Philip Shapira

  3. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Philip Shapira

Authors
  1. Jan Youtie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip Shapira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Youtie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Oak Brooke Way 1147, Atlanta, 30319, USA

    Susan E. Cozzens

  2. Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    Jameson Wetmore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Youtie, J., Shapira, P. (2010). Metropolitan Development of Nanotechnology: Concentration or Dispersion?. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation