Abstract
Friend D., who surprised us in the last morning lesson, chided me as he departed. “How do you come to make our Lessing,” he said, “into a defender of such a misguided and decried teaching? Did no other name occur to you, on which you could foist this suspicious business?” You know, was my answer, that whenever I am casting about for a critic in such things, it is Lessing who first occurs to me. I have long had a philosophical exchange with him; for several years we communicated our thoughts about these matters to each other, communicating them with an unbiased love of truth that did not allow any place for either being self-opinionated or aiming simply to please. Thus, whenever a philosophical proposition is to be discussed, whenever the reasons for and against are to be compared with one another and weighed against one other, it is his image, sometimes out of sheer habit, that still hovers before me. – “Nonetheless, I would hesitate,” he said, “to help myself to his name on this occasion. I would not want, for anything in the world, to arouse the slightest suspicion towards the religious principles of this excellent man.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Fragmentist is Hermann Samuel Reimarus, a portion of whose work Lessing had published as Fragmente eines Ungenannten (1774–8); see the Translators’ Introduction, footnote one.
- 2.
Lessing wrote the play Nathan der Weise, the main character of which was thought to be based on Mendelssohn.
- 3.
Horace, Epistles, Book I, Epistle II, lines 3–4 [see Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica, trans. H. Rushton Fairclough (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999), 263: “[W]ho tells us what is fair, what is foul, what is helpful, what not, more plainly and better than Chrysippus or Crantor”].
- 4.
Epistles, Book I, Epistle II, line 5 [ibid.: “Why I have come to think so, let me tell you, unless there is something else to take your attention.”].
- 5.
Psalm 113, 5–6.
- 6.
The text Mendelssohn reproduces here is from Lessing’s theological Nachlass published in 1784. The “little work” that Lessing published just before his death is Die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts (“The Education of the Human Race”) (1780), and Mendelssohn is referring particularly to §73 of that work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mendelssohn, M., Dahlstrom, D.O., Dyck, C. (2011). Lessing. – His Contribution to the Religion of Reason. – His Thoughts on Purified Pantheism.. In: Dahlstrom, D., Dyck, C. (eds) Morning Hours. Studies in German Idealism, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0418-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0418-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0417-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0418-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)