Skip to main content

Inclusive Adaptation: Linking Participatory Learning and Knowledge Management to Urban Resilience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Resilient Cities

Part of the book series: Local Sustainability ((LOCAL,volume 1))

Abstract

Uncertainty, unpredictability and change have become key characteristics of today’s interdependent world. Although risks, disasters and crises are inherent to human existence, the speed, frequency and scale at which they occur today are unprecedented. Natural disasters related to global warming have increased in the last decade. Although climate change is considered a global problem, its impacts are felt locally. Cities, then, must respond earlier and more effectively to risks and hazards. Although both ‘resilience thinking’ and ‘community based adaptation’ have made headway, they have been mainly applied to rural areas and natural resource management at regional levels within social–ecological systems. This paper applies the lessons of resilience thinking and experiences in community-based adaptation efforts to urban areas.

The paper argues that participatory knowledge management systems can enhance resilience in urban areas. Participatory knowledge management systems equip stakeholders at the local level to deal more effectively with sudden change, risks, and long-term stresses. Simultaneously, they can foster social capital and trust, strategic leadership, and enhance collective competence – all important components of resilient systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The full title of this research programme is ‘Urban chances – city growth and the sustainability challenge. Comparing fast growing cities in growing economies’. Funded under the 7th EU-framework programme (Project no. 244828), the programme partners include the European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), Germany; Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), France; School of Planning and Architecture (SPA), India; Cities for Life Forum (FORO), Peru; Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP), Brazil; Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR), Norway; and the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), South Africa. For more information on the research programme see: http://www.chance2sustain.eu/.

  2. 2.

    See also Norris et al. 2008 ‘Resilience is a process linking a set of adaptive capacities to a positive trajectory of functioning and adaptation after a disturbance’ (Norris et al. 2008: 130).

  3. 3.

    Redundancy refers to the extent to which substitutions are possible in the event of disruption or degradation (Norris et al. 2008: 131). When applied to urban systems, for instance, it can refer to alternative energy resources, redundancy in transport possibilities and/or roads, or communication systems. It always implies that alternative systems can take over in case the main system fails. Redundancy in urban governance networks is less straightforward. It is important that alternative actors can take over if the main actor fails to act in a crisis (see our paragraph on strategic leadership). However, redundancy in urban governance networks introduces the risk of unclear or overlapping possibilities, paralyzing rather than fostering key stakeholder initiatives.

  4. 4.

    Resistance strategies are most appropriate for known dangers, which are likely to happen with some frequency and can be anticipated. They are far less appropriate to deal with ‘unknown unknowns’ (Longstaff 2005 cited in Norris et al. 2008: 132).

  5. 5.

    It is interesting to note that Norris et al. (2008) listed very similar aspects of what they labelled primary sets of adaptive capacities; namely, economic development, social capital, information and communication and community competence. In their definition, ‘to build collective resilience, communities must reduce risk and resource inequities, engage local people in mitigation, create organizational linkages, boost and protect social supports, and plan for not having a plan, which requires flexibility, decision making skills and trusted sources of information that in function in the face of unknowns’ (Norris et al. 2008: 127).

  6. 6.

    For instance, long-term predictions from climate change models need to be combined with local knowledge on specific trends already experienced to produce a localised understanding of risks (Reid et al. 2009).

  7. 7.

    Bonding capital refers to social ties among people with a shared identity, i.e., homogeneous groups. Bridging capital refers to ties between groups with differing identities (heterogeneous groups) but with shared objectives. Linking social ties refers to vertical links, for instance between communities, leaders and government institutions.

  8. 8.

    Norris et al. (2008) defined ‘community competence’ as ‘the networked equivalent of human agency’, hence the capacity for decision making and meaningful collective action. Prerequisites for these capacities are critical reflection and deliberation, and creativity and flexibility (Norris et al. 2008: 136). We label the capacity of governance networks of various stakeholders ‘collective competence’.

  9. 9.

    A clear exception is the participatory vulnerability analysis (PVA) developed by Action Aid, which starts at the community level, but also feeds into district, national and international levels (Reid et al. 2009: 27).

References

  • Abel N, Cumming D et al (2006) Collapse and reorganization in social-ecological systems: questions, some ideas, and policy implications. Ecol Soc 11(1):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Brown K et al (2005) The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecol Soc 10(2):212–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre BE (2006) Preliminary paper #356: on the concept of resilience. Disaster Research Centre, University of Delaware, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Baud I, Hordijk M (2009) Dealing with risks in urban governance: what can we learn from ‘resilience thinking’. In: The new urban question: urbanism beyond neo-liberalism – 4th conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU), Amsterdam and Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Zuiderkerk, 26–28 Nov 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Baud I, Kuffer M et al (2010) Understanding heterogeneity in metropolitan India: the added value of remote sensing data for analyzing sub-standard residential areas. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 12(5):359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baud I, Sridharan N et al (2008) Mapping urban poverty for local governance in an Indian mega-city: the case of Delhi. Urban Stud 45(7):1385–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baud ISA, Pfeffer K et al (2009) Matching deprivation mapping to urban governance in three Indian mega-cities. Habitat Int 33(4):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J et al (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizikova L, Dickinson T et al (2009) Participatory scenario development for climate change adaptation. Particip Learn Action 60:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmeier K, Tovey H (2008) Knowledge in sustainable rural development: from forms of knowledge to knowledge processes. Sociol Ruralis 48:313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee J, Healey P (2003) My voice: my place: tracking transformations in urban governance. Urban Stud 40(10):1979–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodman D (2010) Risk and resilience in urban areas: the climate change challenge. Resilience in urban development: what can urban governance contribute? University of Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodman D, Ayers J et al (2009) Building resilience. State of the world 2009: into a warming world. The Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JC, Maceda EA (2009) Participatory three dimensional mapping for disaster risk reduction. Particip Learn Action 60:107–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazard Rev 4(3):136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2008) Technical paper on climate change and water. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, PCC-XXVIII/ Doc.13 (8.IV.2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/

  • Longstaff PH (2005) Security, resilience, and communication in unpredictable environments such as terrorism, natural disasters, and complex technology. Center for Information Policy Research, Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff PH, Yang S (2008) Communication management and trust: their role in building resilience to ‘surprises’ such as natural disasters, pandemic flu, and terrorism. Ecol Soc 13(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyena SB (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30(4):434–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda L, Hordijk M (1998) Let us build cities for life: the national campaign of local Agenda 21s in Peru. Environ Urban 10(2):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris F, Stevens S et al (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41(1):127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience, Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environ Change 15:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad N, Ranghieri F et al (2009) Climate resilient cities: a primer on reducing vulnerabilities to disasters. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid H, Alam M et al (2009) Community-based adaptation to climate change: an overview. Particip Learn Action 60:11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D, Barnett C (2009) Something in the air: civic science and contentious environmental politics in post-apartheid South Africa. Geoforum 40(3):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat (2007) Enhancing urban safety and security; global report on human settlements 2007. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ewijk E, Baud I (2009) Partnerships between Dutch municipalities and municipalities in countries of migration to the Netherlands; knowledge exchange and mutuality. Habitat Int 33(2):218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Hordijk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hordijk, M., Baud, I. (2011). Inclusive Adaptation: Linking Participatory Learning and Knowledge Management to Urban Resilience. In: Otto-Zimmermann, K. (eds) Resilient Cities. Local Sustainability, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0785-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics