Abstract
This paper examines the assumption that is present in society (if not in law) that not-for-profit enterprises are unlikely to exhibit unethical behaviour in their governance function. It explores this issue by examining a recent case of governance failure within a not-for-profit social enterprise that had unethical behaviour at its root. This failure ultimately led to the organisation becoming bankrupt. A parallel is drawn with governance failures within the private sector which also resulted in bankruptcy. The paper draws on theories of governance and stakeholder management in order to reflect on whether unethical governance behaviour is a continuing threat to all sectors. In doing so, it concludes that there is merit in challenging the assumption that values-based organisations are immune to such a threat to their organisational existence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For an example, see Hayden (2006).
- 2.
Thanks go to Chris Chinnock, an MSc student at the University of Huddersfield who conducted the primary data collection.
References
Abzug, R., and J. Galaskiewicz. 2001. Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise of symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30: 51–73.
Bart, C., and K. Deal. 2006. The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: A comparison of board practices in ‘For Profit’ and ‘Not For Profit’ organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2: 2–22.
Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932/1991. The modern corporation and private property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bouckaert, L., and J. Vandenhove. 1998. Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1073–1081.
Brown, W.A. 2002. Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12: 369–385.
Child, J., and S.B. Rodrigues. 2004. Repairing the breach of trust in corporate governance. Corporate Governance 12: 143–152.
Clarke, T. 2005. Accounting for Enron: Shareholder value and stakeholder interests. Corporate Governance 13: 598–612.
Dart, R. 2004. The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14: 411–424.
Donaldson, T., and L.E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.
Dunn, A., and C.A. Riley. 2004. Supporting the not-for-profit sector: The government’s review of charitable and social enterprise. The Modern Law Review 67: 632–657.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 32–34.
Goodpaster, K. 1993. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In Applied ethics: A reader, ed. E.R. Winkler and J.R. Coombs, 229–248. Oxford: Blackwell.
Grosvold, J., S. Brammer, and B. Rayton. 2007. Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business ethics: A European review 16: 344–357.
Hayden, E.W. 2006. Governance failures also occur in the non-profit world. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2: 116–128.
Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Hutton, W. 1995. The state we’re in. London: Jonathan Cape.
Iecovich, E. 2005. The profile of board membership in Israeli voluntary organisations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 16: 161–180.
Klein, N. 2008. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
Letza, S., X. Sun, and J. Kirkbride. 2004. Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance 12: 242–262.
Low, C., and C. Cowton. 2004. Beyond stakeholder engagement: The challenges of stakeholder participation in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1: 45–55.
Mason, C., J. Kirkbride, and D. Bryde. 2007. From stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision 45: 284–301.
Miller-Millesen, J.L. 2003. Understanding the behaviour of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32: 521–547.
Monks, R.A.G., and N. Minow. 2008. Corporate governance, 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Parker, L.D. 2007. Internal governance in the nonprofit boardroom: A participant observer study. Corporate governance 15: 923–934.
Pearce, J. 2003. Social enterprise in anytown. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
Ruigrok, W., S. Peck, and S. Tacheva. 2007. Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance 15: 546–557.
Samra-Fredericks, D. 2000. Doing ‘Boards-In-Action’ research – an ethnographic approach for the capture and analysis of directors’ and senior managers’ interactive routines. Corporate Governance 8: 244–257.
Silverman, D. 2000. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
Sternberg, E. 2000. The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance 8: 3–10.
Turnbull, S. 2007. Analysing network governance of public assets. Corporate Governance 15: 1079–1089.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Low, C. (2011). When Good Turns to Bad: An Examination of Governance Failure in a Not-for-Profit Enterprise. In: Brink, A. (eds) Corporate Governance and Business Ethics. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1588-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1588-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1587-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1588-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)