Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 117))

  • 1007 Accesses

Abstract

Since scholars have raised the question concerning Plato’s methods, and since understanding his methods is a necessary condition for understanding or reconstructing his thought, the scholarly concern (earlier and recent) with methods used or discussed in his dialogues is not surprising. Further, if this is an exegetical necessity, then central concepts crucial to discussions about causal explanations (as well as widely accepted accounts of these very same concepts) need to be thoroughly reexamined in light of pertinent inquiries, especially those carried out in the last decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ackrill, J.L. 1997. Essays in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1971. “Alcmeon Re-examined.” Studii Clasice XIII:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1974/1994. Sense and Perception in Greek Philosophy. New York: W. Green/Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1988a. The Concept of Causality in Presocratic Philosophy. Thessaloniki: Vanias.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1988b. “The Concept of Causality in Plato.” Studii Clasice, IIX:31–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1989. “Greek Skeptics On Causality.” Discorsi IX:7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1989/1990. “Alcmeon’s and Hippocrates’s Concept of Aitia.” Medical Ethics 9–15. Reprinted in Nicolacopoulos, P. ed., Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. 1995. Ancient Greek Theory of Knowledge. Athens: Hestia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel, R.B. 1967. “Explanation and Prediction: A Plea for Reasons.” Philosophy of Science 34:276–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. 1982. “Aristotle on Insufficient Causes.” Philosophical Quarterly 32:311–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, J.P. 1968. “The Ultimate Theme of the Phaedo.” Arethusa I:94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, J.P., ed. 1980. Science and the Sciences in Plato. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer-Hind, R.D. 1881. “On Some Difficulties in the Platonic Psychology.” Journal of Philology 10:120–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgelis, N. 1971. The Concept of Causality in Logical Positivism. Thessaloniki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelos, C. 1956. “Das Einsehen und das Voraussehen im Platonischen Höhlengleichnis.” Plato I:95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. 1955. “Why Cannot an Effect Precede Its Cause.” Analysis 16:49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. 1998. “Plato’s Discovery of Metaphysics: The New Methods of the Phaedo.” In Method in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. Gentzler, 91–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, R.B. 1953. Scientific Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C.D. 1935. “Mechanical and Teleological Causation.” Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 14 (Supplementary):83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks, A.W. 1951. “The Logic of Causal Propositions.” Mind 60:363–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., and J.C. Drabkin. 1948. A Source Book in Greek Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, F.M. 1942. “Was the Ionian Philosophy Scientific.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 62:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, I.M. 1963. Examination of Plato’s Doctrines (Vol. I). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vogel, C.J. 1963. Greek Philosophy I. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, H. 1897. Doxographi Graeci. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, J.L. 1953. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler (2nd ed). New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, C. 1957. “On the Analysis of Causality.” Journal of Philosophy 54:422–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, C. 1965. “Concerning the Uniformity of Causality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26:97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fain, H. 1963. “Some Problems of Causal Explanation.” Mind 72:519–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. 1987. “Forms as Causes: Plato and Aristotle.” In Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, edited by A. Graeser, 69–112. Bern: P. Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G., ed. 1999. Plato 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. 1954. “Can an Effect Precede its Cause?” Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 28 (Supplementary):45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede, M. 1980. “The Original Notion of Cause.” In Doubt and Dogmatism, edited by J. Barnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallop, D. 1975. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin, D. 1955. “Causation and Recipes.” Mind 54:479–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. 1956. “The Third Man Again.” Philosophical Review 65:72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzler, J. 1988. Method in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgoulis, C. 1975. History of Greek Philosophy. Athens: Papademas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin, M. 1993. “Causality: A Historical Sketch of the Major Philosophical Approaches to the Problem.” Communication and Cognition 26:131–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, G. 1888. Plato and Other Companions of Socrates (4th ed.). London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W.K.C. 1967. A History of Greek Philosophy 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W.K.C. 1981. A History of Greek Philosophy 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackforth, R. 1950. “Immortality In Plato’s Symposium.” The Classical Review 64:43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackforth, R., trans. 1955. Plato’s Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackforth, R. 1972. Plato’s Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, F.G. 2003. “Metechein, metalambanein and the Problem of Participation in Plato’s Ontology.” Philosophical Inquiry XXV(3, 4):19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. 1973. “Knowledge and Its Objects in Plato.” In Patterns in Plato’s Thought, edited by J.M.E. Moravcsik, 31–51. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houssiadas, L. 1964. An Exploratory Study of the Perception of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutten, E.H. 1962. The Origins of Science. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyt, D. 1969. “Plato’s Paradox that the Immutable is Unknowable.” Philosophical Quarterly 19:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. 1983. “Two Distinctions in Goodness.” Philosophical Review 92(2):169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., ed. 1992. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A.C. 1976. “The Principle that the Cause is Greater than Its Effect.” Phronesis 21:146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. 1965. “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2:245–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, J. 1991. Plato on Self–predication of Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, G.B., and T.A. Blackson. 1989. “Causes in the Phaedo.” Synthese 79:581–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michotte, A. 1954. La Perception de la Causalitê. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehamas, A. 1972–1973. “Predication and Forms of Opposites in the Phaedo.” Review of Metaphysics 26:461–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehamas, A. 1975. “Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World.” American Philosophical Quarterly 12:105–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. 1967. “The Last Argument of Plato’s Phaedo I.” Classical Quarterly 17:198–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G.E.L. 1968. “Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of Forms.” In his Aristotle On Dialectic, 103–25. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, N. 2006. Plato and the Republic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, T., and C.J. Rowe. 1994. “Desire for the Good.” Phronesis 39(1):1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, R. 1968. A History of Classical Scholarship I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J.E. 1965. Plato’s Thought in the Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. 1953. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, L. 1966. “The Deuterous Plous in Plato’s Phaedo.” The Monist 50:464–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1912–1913. “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 12:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1979. Socrates. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1980. “The Form of the Good in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophical Inquiry 1:374–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1985. “Two Theories of Good in Plato’s Republic.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57:223–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1986. “Plato on Goodness and Rationality.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 40:97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1988. Plato and Freud. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1993. “Does Aristotle Have a Virtue Ethics?” Philosophical Inquiry, 3–4:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 2001. Goodness and Justice: Plato, Aristotle, and the Moderns. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 2006. “Justice, Law, and Women in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophical Inquiry, XXII:91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. 1960. A History of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, K.M. 1969. Plato’s Analytic Method. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. 1999. Order in Multiplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, P. 1935. Plato: The Republic, Vol. I & II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, P. 1948. “The Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic.” University of Chicago Studies in Classical Philology, I:188–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.E. 1928. A Commentary On Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Waerden, B.L. 1961. Science Awakening. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanquickenborne, M. 1969. “An Analysis of Causality in Everyday Language.” Logique et Analyse, 12:311–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virvidakis, S. 1989. “A Metaethical Approach to Plato and Aristotle.” Philosophical Inquiry 11:38–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. 1967. “Degrees of Reality in Plato.” In New Essays in Plato and Aristotle, edited by R. Bambrough, 219–34. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. 1969. “Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo.” Philosophical Review, 78:291–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. 1981. Platonic Studies, 187–96. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. 1987. “Separation in Plato.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M.F. 1979. Concepts and Causes. The Structure of Plotinus’ Universe. PhD Dissertation. Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windelband, W. 1958. A History of Philosophy I. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G.H. von 1966. The Varieties of Goodness. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, S. 1991. “Are the Forms aitiai in the Phaedo?Hermes 119:37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. 1991. “On Plato’s Theory of the Methexis of Ideas.” Philosophical Inquiry 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, E. 1922. Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Gerasimos Santas and Georgios Anagnostopoulos for critical comments that helped me to clarify and correct some points in my discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andriopoulos, D. (2011). Comments on Plato’s Causal Explanation. In: Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds) Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian Studies: Essays in Honor of Gerasimos Santas. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 117. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics