Skip to main content

Abstract

As the epigraph suggests, the literature review may be considered a rite of passage (and some times a road block) in the career of the professional researcher. The literature review is the foundation of any research project and an essential component of any professional research endeavor. A comprehensive review of the literature should be performed at the earliest stage of any research project as it simultaneously grounds a project within a specific historical context, positions the researcher within a given theoretical landscape, establishes the relevance of the proposed study, and is a key determinant of the subsequent research methodology. Yet, performing an effective review and “writing it up” are difficult tasks that require the development and maintenance of specific skill sets over time. In this chapter, the process of writing the literature review will be discussed in general terms, as will the intended audience of the literature review. Finally, the chapter will differentiate the scale, scope, and purpose of the “lit review” insofar as it may be written for various audiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The LPU is a somewhat controversial approach towards scholarly research (see Owen 2004). Our reference to the concept of the LPU is only to compare and contrast it to the other strategies of scholarly publication.

References

  • Bradbury J, Keim B, Wake C (2003) The influence of regional storm tracking and teleconnections on winter precipitation in the Northeastern United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:544–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint C (2003) Political geography II: terrorism, modernity, governance and governmentality. Prog Hum Geogr 27:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl D (1988) How to prepare a research proposal: guidelines for funding & dissertations in the social & behavioral sciences. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller P (1971) Dissertation abstract: Thünian analysis at the macro-scale: a trend-surface analysis of the Spatial Organization of American Agriculture. Department of Geography, Rutgers University, A. Getis (advisor)

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen W (2004) First person: in defense of the least publishable unit. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 9 Feb. http://www.chronicle.com

  • Suvanto S, Applegate G, Permana R, Khususiyah N, Kurniawan I (2004) The role of fire in changing landuse and livelihoods in Riau-Sumatra. Ecol Soc 9:15 (11 pages)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay D. Gatrell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatrell, J.D., Bierly, G.D., Jensen, R.R. (2012). Literature Reviews. In: Research Design and Proposal Writing in Spatial Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2281-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics