Skip to main content

Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: Ethical Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reproductive Health and Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 732))

Abstract

Ethical consideration has a strong history and is of prime importance in the field medicine. Starting from the birth of Western medical ethics, the Hippocratic Oath, to the modern framework set forth by the Principalist approach [1] which involves the consideration of four principles – autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance, and justice. These four principles are not rigid mandates. Rather, these principles are meant to provide a useful framework to help health care providers make decisions when reflecting on moral issues as they arise. Although these principles are useful for many medical encounters, certain situations may present conflict between two or more principles and ethical dilemmas may arise. The burgeoning field of reproductive medical technology is ripe with ethical dilemmas and suggests a need for on-going ethical analysis as the sensitive topics of human life and reproductive rights are addressed. One of the most recent medical advances in reproductive medicine, attracting ethical consideration, is the practice of fertility preservation in cancer patients. The reproductive technologies allowing fertility preservation in cancer patients were born out of a recognized need to address the reported psychological distressed caused by infertility [2–7] in the increasing population of cancer survivors with impaired fertility [8]. The ethical endorsement of the practice of offering fertility preservation to cancer patients stems from the ethical principle of autonomy, referring to self-government and free choice, which promotes the individual right to reproduce and beneficence, to do good to patients by relieving distress associated with infertility.

It was an endless series of bad news, good news – an emotional rollercoaster. The day the doctors told me my six year old daughter had cancer was the darkest day of my life. Then they told me her chances of survival were good but she would never have children and she may have other permanent damage like hearing loss and heart problems. I thought about how much having children meant to me, how being a mother was what I had dreamed of when I was a little girl. My little girl seemed to have the same dream. She mothered her dolls, mothered the cat, she liked to dress up in my high heels and purse and say she was going to the store to buy food for her baby dolls. Now she was going to be robbed of this experience. The good news was she was likely to survive but the bad news was she was never going to have the life we wanted for her and we thought she wanted for herself. I asked her doctor if there was anything we could do to prevent the sterility. He told me there was an experimental procedure we could consider where they froze some tissue from her ovaries. He said there were no guarantees and it was expensive and not likely to be covered by our insurance. I thought about it for a long time and weighed the pros and cons. If I didn’t do this procedure for her would she be angry at me when she was older? If I allowed her to have the procedure would the extra time and money be worth it? Would my daughter feel compelled to have a child because I had stored her tissue for her? Would this experimental procedure lead to a baby for her one day? I had a lot of questions but no answers. I asked the doctors if there was another parent I could talk to who was faced with the same decisions as me. I felt very alone, and even selfish when they told me that most parents were grateful if their child had a good survival prognosis and didn’t worry about fertility. I didn’t have a lot of time to make a decision either – they wanted to start treatment right away. I did some searching on the Internet and found a national organization. I started to read about how other parents were in the same quandary as me – I was not alone but most parents didn’t express their concerns to their child’s oncology team because they were waiting for the team to bring it up. In the end I decided to have my daughter’s ovarian tissue frozen. Was it the right thing to do? I don’t know and won’t know for a long time. But I thought about how we saved for college for her, so she would have that option. This seemed like another type of savings plan. Time will tell if I made the right decision.

Emma, Mother of Pediatric Cancer Survivor

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA (1999) Having children after cancer. Cancer 86(4):697–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S (2002) Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1880–1889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter J, Rowland K, Chi D, Brown C, Abu-Rustum N, Castiel M et al (2005) Gynecologic cancer treatment and the impact of cancer-related infertility. Gynecol Oncol 97(1):90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartmann JT, Albrecht C, Schmoll HJ, Kuczyk MA, Kollmannsberger C, Bokemeyer C (1999) Long-term effects on sexual function and fertility after treatment of testicular cancer. Br J Cancer 80(5–6):801–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M et al (2004) Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(20):4174–4183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rieker P, Fitzgerald E, Kalish L (1990) Adaptive behavioral responses to potential infertility among survivors of testis cancer. J Clin Oncol 8(2):347–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. American Cancer Society (2007) Global cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tschudin S, Bitzer J (2009) Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Hum Reprod Update 15(5):587–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyne KD, Kader A, Agarwal A (2010) Creating a standard of care for fertility preservation. Curr Women’s Health Rev 6:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee S, Schover L, Partridge A, Patrizio P, Wallace W, Hagerty K et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24:2917–2931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive (2005) Medicine fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 83(6):1622–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Lee J-H, Jacobsen PB, Bepler G, Lancaster J et al (2009) Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol 27(35):5952–5957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST (2008) Fertility preservation and adolescent/young adult cancer patients: physician communication challenges. J Adolesc Health 44(4):394–400

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quinn G, Vadaparampil S, Gwede C, Miree C, King L, Clayton H et al (2007) Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists’ views. J Cancer Survivorship 1(2):146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S (2002) Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1890–1897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Bell-Ellison BA, Gwede CK, Albrecht TL (2008) Patient-physician communication barriers regarding fertility preservation among newly diagnosed cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 66(3):784–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraietta R, Spaine DM, Bertolla RP, Ortiz V, Cedenho AP Individual and seminal characteristics of patients with testicular germ cell tumors. Fertil Steril 94(6):2107–2112

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zapzalka DM, Redmon JB, Pryor JL (1999) A survey of oncologists regarding sperm cryopreservation and assisted reproductive techniques for male cancer patients. Cancer 86(9):1812–1817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, McGowan Lowrey K, Eidson S, Knapp C, Bukulmez O. State laws and regulations addressing third-party reimbursement for infertility treatment: implications for cancer survivors. Fertil Steril 95(1):72–78

    Google Scholar 

  21. Debono DJ, Kohnke JM, Helft PR (2009) Addressing fertility in patients with advanced cancer: how the quality oncology practice initiative standards and ASCO guidelines facilitate ethical communication. J Oncol Pract 5(6):298–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Devroey P et al (2006) ESHRE task force on ethics and law 11: posthumous assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 21(12):3050–3053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahadur G (2004) Ethical challenges in reproductive medicine: posthumous reproduction. Int Congr Series 1266:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson JA (2005) Cancer and fertility: ethical and legal challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 34: 104–106

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kramer A (2009) Sperm retrieval from terminally ill or recently deceased patients: a review. Can J Urol 16(3):4627–4631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aziza-Shuster E (1994) Ethics and society: a child at all costs: posthumous reproduction and the meaning of parenthood. Hum Reprod 9(11):2182–2185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schover LR (2005) Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005(34):2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ericson A, Kallen B (2001) Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 16(3):504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernqvist K (2002) Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet 359(9305):461–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA (2006) Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod 21(3):694–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S (2011) Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update 17(1):107–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2008) Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, AL

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hydén-Granskog C, Hovatta O (1999) Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod 14(9):2392–2395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lyerly AD, Steinhauser K, Voils C, Namey E, Alexander C, Bankowski B et al (2010) Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertil Steril 93(2):499–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kurinczuk JJ, Hansen Ml, Bower C (2004) The risk of birth defects in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 16(3):201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sankila R, Olsen JH, Anderson H, Garwicz S et al (2010) Risk of cancer among offspring of childhood cancer survivors. New Engl J Med 338:1339–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Casper RF, Mitwally MFM (2006) Aromatase inhibitors for ovulation induction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(3):760–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schover LR (1999) Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. Med Pediatr Oncol 33:53–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Levine J, Canada A, Stern C (2010) Fertility preservation in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cohen CB (2008) Some perils of “waiting to be born”: fertility preservation in girls facing certain treatments for cancer. Am J Bioeth 8:30–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Livestrong (2011) Fertilehope.org.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwendolyn P. Quinn PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bower, B., Quinn, G.P. (2012). Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: Ethical Considerations. In: Quinn, G., Vadaparampil, S. (eds) Reproductive Health and Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 732. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2492-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics